President Bush to Blame?

[BlingDaddy]

I don't think soooooo.... My personal favorite is the last one.
Read em and weep liberal fucks......


Where Bush Got His Marching Orders



"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998



"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998



"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998



"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998



"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998



"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998



"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999



"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. BobGraham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001



"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002



"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002



"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002



"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002



"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002



"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002



"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002



"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002



"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapon stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002



"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002



"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation .. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003



SO NOW THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, AND THAT HE TOOK US TO WAR UNECESSARILY !



TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PRESIDENT LEADING US TO WAR!

[Aly-Python]

Bring it to AlyTV tomorrow!

I can't take callers, but will be taking AIMs... Hey, it's a start!

[genomega]

SO NOW THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, AND THAT HE TOOK US TO WAR UNECESSARILY !

Yep the left wingers lie and press swears to it.

[NBDesign]

1st Iraq Next Iran... Fuck that shit... I still want Bin Laden God Damn It!!!!!

You fucking idiots keep forgetting the one responsible for 9/11... Give me Bin Laden if you want my fuicking vote.

[CamChicks]

None of those quotes seems to be demanding an occupation.

"One way or the other"... "If Saddam rejects peace" ... " if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites" ... "-- if necessary--" etc etc etc

Invading Iraq was a strategic blunder. (both times)

[CamChicks]

btw - this really isn't a democrat vs republican issue.

You should revoke the decision making ability of people who make bad moves. The consequences of these moves were/are so obvious that to enact them is, for lack of a better word, treasonous.

America should be embarrased that they've been out-played by someone plotting in a cave.

[bopha]

I agree with ya Camchicks. Your post was most excellent.

[rambler]

Originally posted by CamChicks
btw - this really isn't a democrat vs republican issue.

You should revoke the decision making ability of people who make bad moves. The consequences of these moves were/are so obvious that to enact them is, for lack of a better word, treasonous.

America should be embarrased that they've been out-played by someone plotting in a cave.

[fr33s3x]

Hurlekhin

[sacX]

Clinton wasn't committing 130 billion dollars (and counting) and risking thousands of lives. When you do this it's not unreasonable to expect you to back up your rhetoric, and update your evidence.

[BlingDaddy]

Originally posted by CamChicks
btw - this really isn't a democrat vs republican issue.

You should revoke the decision making ability of people who make bad moves. The consequences of these moves were/are so obvious that to enact them is, for lack of a better word, treasonous.

America should be embarrased that they've been out-played by someone plotting in a cave.

VERY Well said. The bottom line is this isn't a problem that just showed up in the last 4 years.... It's been going on for over 20, and needs to be stopped.

[adulion]

for those who follow uk politics- blair is pretty red faced at the moment.. it is stated that inteliegence was inacurate meaning no on should have ver tepped foot into iraq. im waiting on blairs resignation which wont happen..

</2 cents>

[sacX]

Originally posted by adulion
for those who follow uk politics- blair is pretty red faced at the moment.. it is stated that inteliegence was inacurate meaning no on should have ver tepped foot into iraq. im waiting on blairs resignation which wont happen..

</2 cents>

yeah that report pretty much vindicated the BBC who said the Government had sexed up the report..

[EZRhino]

Originally posted by sacX
Clinton wasn't committing 130 billion dollars (and counting) and risking thousands of lives. When you do this it's not unreasonable to expect you to back up your rhetoric, and update your evidence.

With Clintons lack of action he did. Without question, service men are dying because of his budget cuts and lack of balls to do the right thing