Let's not get hung up on semantics. I am positive there are countless other American girls in the same boat. Say I'm speaking for them, then.

Speaking of, where are Ivy and Vanilla and all them at?

I am a Canadian and am very concerned about this new law. I have my sites hosted in the US.

I read through this thread and from what I can gather, most of you seem to think "foreign" people will be exempt from this law.

Do you think I should switch to Canadian hosting, or should it be ok to stay with US hosting as long as I don't live in the states?

Please let me know if anyone finds out for sure. Don't forget about us up here, we don't want to go to jail either :winkwink:

Really though, I don't see how they could do anything to Canadians, because they wouldn't have jurisdiction or authority to do so would they? If the RIAA can't sue me for sharing music, then I don't see how the gov't or whatever could sue me for this.

The only way I believe I would be endangered is if the US asks my gov't to "hand me over" which I doubt they would go through the trouble of even worrying about, unless I was a big time felon, which I'm not.

Keep in mind that it's not just us that this affects -- it affects surfers, too. I've asked our users to write to DOJ to protest the proposed changes.

If you've got loyal customers, this would be an excellent time to get them involved!

Cheers
-b

Thats a great thing if everyone did this , it could show them everyone isnt with the christian right.

Good show today but your 2257 lookup doesnt cover secondary processors. If the DOJ comes in and asks a secondary producer asks who is this girl. If you just tell them where it comes from and dont have a model release and ID . They are in violation.