Breaking News: Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Roger · 07-09-2004, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by genomega
What do you suppose was in all those convoys running from Iraq to Syria for three weeks before the war started?

Again, even if we assume that you're right, the fact that Saddam is a coward who'd rather ship his WMD away while his country is under invasion doesn't make him a threat.

theking · 07-09-2004, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
No it didn't. I watched a documentary long ago that said just that. Maybe previous French intel taken years ago concurred with the US one but certainly not the recent one.

It was the president who wanted to invade Iraq from the get go. They wanted what they wanted and the CIA provided them with the intel to help them invade Iraq even though the CIA already knew the truth.

George Tenant testified in open hearings...just a few weeks ago that French intel (among others) concurred...and I personally viewed the hearings. This broadcast was available world wide as well as reported in print media world wide and the French did not deny his testimony. I would say the proof is in the pudding.

Roger · 07-09-2004, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
George Tenant testified in open hearings...just a few weeks ago that French intel (among others) concurred...and I personally viewed the hearings. This broadcast was available world wide as well as reported in print media world wide and the French did not deny his testimony. I would say the proof is in the pudding.

Same guy who failed to prevent 9/11, gave false info about WMD's and got fired?

Tom_PMs · 07-09-2004, 10:59 AM

Quote:

What do you suppose was in all those convoys running from Iraq to Syria for three weeks before the war started?

*If* thats the case, then perhaps thats the proof that weapons inspectors may have found if a competent leader was in place.

Further, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

We sent 11k troops where Bin Laden was. We got him cornered in the mountains. Then inexplicably, the troops told the Afghan fighters to go in and get Bin Laden for us. Pleased to be explaining it?

BTW: Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

So then all of a sudden we're talking about Iraq. Why? Only the white house knows, to this day.

Connection to 9/11? No.
WMD? No.
Nukes? No.

Why? And where the fuck is bin laden, the man responsible for murdering 3000+ civilian lives in the largest attack ever on american soil? Is he in IRAQ???

God I cant wait until January 1st.

theking · 07-09-2004, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
Same guy who failed to prevent 9/11, gave false info about WMD's and got fired?

The same guy that provided "wrong" information...yes...but does not alter that fact that France nor Germany denied his statement that they concurred with US intel.

directfiesta · 07-09-2004, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by genomega
Those nasty facts get in the way again? Just do a search on the un and oil for food and fraud and by the way France ignored all of the un sanctions on iraq.

I don't have to prove or search... You bring up stories, well back them up. I searched and found nothing .. lol.

directfiesta · 07-09-2004, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
George Tenant testified in open hearings...just a few weeks ago that French intel (among others) concurred...and I personally viewed the hearings. This broadcast was available world wide as well as reported in print media world wide and the French did not deny his testimony. I would say the proof is in the pudding.

Who the fuck cares what Tenant sayed... All along it was all false, so so is this.

Roger · 07-09-2004, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
The same guy that provided "wrong" information...yes...but does not alter that fact that France nor Germany denied his statement that they concurred with US intel.

Deny what? They already said that based on info from intelligence they choose not to invade.

If France came out and denied Tenet's testimony, the republicans will be all up in arms about how France is an enemy. So why exactly would they say anything?

I don't really trust any government though. If France was a part of the coalition they to would've given false info. It's all about politics.

theking · 07-09-2004, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
Who the fuck cares what Tenant sayed... All along it was all false, so so is this.

You clearly care what is said by George Tenant and everyone else in US Government as you bash those in the US Government daily.

theking · 07-09-2004, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
Deny what? They already said that based on info from intelligence they choose not to invade.

That is not a correct description of the position France took pior to the US invasion.

loverboy · 07-09-2004, 12:32 PM

now the Iraqi people has the very right to be mad and hope they not retaliate on this revelation.

07-09-2004, 12:32 PM	#61
loverboy When it rains, it pours Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 20,609	now the Iraqi people has the very right to be mad and hope they not retaliate on this revelation.