Sharapova(pic)

[beergood]

[gornyhuy]

She's even covering her teeth a little so as not to scrape the shaft.

[Thechad]

I wish I was a banana.

[Jdoughs]

Isnt she like 17?

if so..I wouldnt be posting pics of her here

[Evil1]

Originally posted by Thechad
I wish I was a banana.

you really want to drop out of her ass and land in a toilet bowl?

[riosluts]

i have a feeling that someone is going to photoshop that soon

[nofx]

Originally posted by Evil1
you really want to drop out of her ass and land in a toilet bowl?

ROFL

[pimplink]

I still prefer this babe...

[VegasSEGirl]

Originally posted by Evil1
you really want to drop out of her ass and land in a toilet bowl?

Oh gross!!

[StuartD]

Originally posted by Jdoughs
Isnt she like 17?

if so..I wouldnt be posting pics of her here

You are aware that you are allowed to post pics of Tennis Champions fully clothed on a message board, regardless of age, right?

[Spunky]

Originally posted by pimplink
I still prefer this babe...

Schwing... even though it's photoshop

[beergood]

Originally posted by Evil1
you really want to drop out of her ass and land in a toilet bowl?

fucking hilarious

[Jdoughs]

Originally posted by MaskedMan
You are aware that you are allowed to post pics of Tennis Champions fully clothed on a message board, regardless of age, right?

Oh yes i realise that, i just would not post them myself, considering the business we do plus what the courts are doing, just unneeded i think.

I did put I in bold in my post, im not saying he shouldnt, just I wouldnt

[Tuga]

Originally posted by MaskedMan
You are aware that you are allowed to post pics of Tennis Champions fully clothed on a message board, regardless of age, right?

[beergood]

Originally posted by Jdoughs
Oh yes i realise that, i just would not post them myself, considering the business we do plus what the courts are doing, just unneeded i think.

I did put I in bold in my post, im not saying he shouldnt, just I wouldnt

It isn't illegal to discuss the hotness level of teenage chicks. 98% of what we talk about on this board is unneeded. I just thought it was a funny pic. I didn't even think about it that way until you said something....perv

[latinasojourn]

Originally posted by MaskedMan
You are aware that you are allowed to post pics of Tennis Champions fully clothed on a message board, regardless of age, right?

maybe it's not illegal. but it's also not cool.

not cool to post an image of a "civilian" on a porn board so some asswipe can follow up with a photoshop job on her.

and if she is under 18, it really isn't cool.

[sixxxth_sense]

Originally posted by gornyhuy
She's even covering her teeth a little so as not to scrape the shaft.

LOL i hate it when the teeth are biting down on my head!!!! it fucking HURTTSS!!!!

[aSStig]

i guess guys do sometimes enjoy when girls are biting their hard cocks . . . .

[pxxx]

Originally posted by sixxxth_sense
LOL i hate it when the teeth are biting down on my head!!!! it fucking HURTTSS!!!!

[StuartD]

Originally posted by latinasojourn
maybe it's not illegal. but it's also not cool.

not cool to post an image of a "civilian" on a porn board so some asswipe can follow up with a photoshop job on her.

and if she is under 18, it really isn't cool.

Perhaps, but this is still a message board... people constantly post pictures of ugly girls or so-so girls that are in the news and no one questions it... as soon as it's a hot girl, suddenly it's a big issue.

[AMADude]

Originally posted by Jdoughs
Isnt she like 17?

if so..I wouldnt be posting pics of her here

[latinasojourn]

Originally posted by MaskedMan
Perhaps, but this is still a message board... people constantly post pictures of ugly girls or so-so girls that are in the news and no one questions it... as soon as it's a hot girl, suddenly it's a big issue.

of course other people do it. but this is a message board relevant to the adult webmaster community.

i just don't think it's appropriate to post images of civilian girls on an adult webmaster board, so a bunch of guys can photoshop them, particularly if the subject is under 18.

i don't expect many people on this board to understand the concept.

[latinasojourn]

ok, and i'll just make an important point to some of you fucking idiots.

if the girl in question is Maria Sharapova
the girl is a minor:

Date of Birth: April 19, 1987

the GFY board is arguably the highest traffic adult webmaster board in the world.

because of that it is highly likely that the US DOJ monitors this board.

so the first fucking idiot who photoshops this girl and puts a cock in her mouth or some other visual concoction and publishes the image here, and is identifiable as a citizen of the USA could very well have a personal visit.

lots of kids here talking out of their asses.

[Manowar]

Originally posted by gornyhuy
She's even covering her teeth a little so as not to scrape the shaft.

expierenced

[pure energy]

I love Anna! Nice curves!

[RP Fade]

That's just begging for photoshop

[CDSmith]

Originally posted by latinasojourn
ok, and i'll just make an important point to some of you fucking idiots.

if the girl in question is Maria Sharapova
the girl is a minor:

Date of Birth: April 19, 1987

the GFY board is arguably the highest traffic adult webmaster board in the world.

because of that it is highly likely that the US DOJ monitors this board.

so the first fucking idiot who photoshops this girl and puts a cock in her mouth or some other visual concoction and publishes the image here, and is identifiable as a citizen of the USA could very well have a personal visit.

lots of kids here talking out of their asses.

These same pictures get posted on news sites, CNN, MSN etc. Who's to say anyone photoshopping it didn't grab it from there?


And this isn't a porn board, it's a webmaster board first and foremost. If her pic can be posted all over the net on media sites it can be posted here. Someone could maybe get peeved over hotlinking (if it's hotlinked), but other than that..... she's not nude, as far as I'm concerned these kinds of pics are fair game.

[CDSmith]

Also, if some shop-meister wants to doctor up her pic, he does so at HIS OWN risk, not GFY's. No board checks every post before it is submitted thus no message board has direct control over what is posted.

I'd let Lens & company worry about what might or might not harm their board.



Besides, doesn't this girl turn 18 in like 10 minutes?

[steve_cobra]

I'm sure the Feds are in a big meeting right now trying to get an arrest warrant for "BeerGood" for a picture of a fully clothed Tennis Star taken during a public match.

[CDSmith]

Originally posted by steve_cobra
I'm sure the Feds are in a big meeting right now trying to get an arrest warrant for "BeerGood" for a picture of a fully clothed Tennis Star taken during a public match.

Yep. We're done for.

[latinasojourn]

Originally posted by CDSmith
Also, if some shop-meister wants to doctor up her pic, he does so at HIS OWN risk, not GFY's. No board checks every post before it is submitted thus no message board has direct control over what is posted.

I'd let Lens & company worry about what might or might not harm their board.



Besides, doesn't this girl turn 18 in like 10 minutes?

sometimes i don't know why i bother trying to educate a few young people on the dangers of toying with the US DOJ.

and since it's late, and i'm about to go offline, i will make a final attempt to give the REASON why playing around with images of minors is a VERY RISKY PASTIME for US citizens.

i am not talking about merely posting a news image---i am refering to something that certain people in this thread are "begging for", namely to photoshop this image of a 17 year old in a sexually provocative way...

don't even think about it if you are in the USA.

emphasis mine:

''child pornography'' means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -

---------------------------------
(B)

such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;

(C)

such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or

(D)

such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and

(9)

''identifiable minor'' -

-----------------------------------

if you guys claim to be in the adult business you best get conversant with applicable law if you do business in USA.

[steve_cobra]

Yeah, it's almost as if everyone on many a public message board haven't been collectively jerking off to the Olsen Twins the last few years.

Serious, get a clue and get off your soapbox. I've been a messageboard veteran for a few years and have been on many. This is the sorta shit that goes on.

I'm sure you have many examples of people getting in trouble since this sorta thing has been going on since the beginning of the internet.

Or are you so desperately trying to prove your point that you can't listen to reason?

[GonePhishing]

Everyone needs a dose of potassium!

[CDSmith]

Originally posted by latinasojourn
sometimes i don't know why i bother trying to educate a few young people on the dangers of toying with the US DOJ.

and since it's late, and i'm about to go offline, i will make a final attempt to give the REASON why playing around with images of minors is a VERY RISKY PASTIME for US citizens.

i am not talking about merely posting a news image---i am refering to something that certain people in this thread are "begging for", namely to photoshop this image of a 17 year old in a sexually provocative way...

don't even think about it if you are in the USA.

emphasis mine:

''child pornography'' means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -

---------------------------------
(B)

such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;

(C)

such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or

(D)

such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and

(9)

''identifiable minor'' -

-----------------------------------

if you guys claim to be in the adult business you best get conversant with applicable law if you do business in USA.

My friend, please spare me the condescending "young people" crap, k?

I've been at this game a while, I'm older than most here.


... and you really need to just lighten up a bit with the legal shmegal advice shit sometimes. It's great on some threads and much appreciated, but there are these other times when.... well..... it's just downright annoying as shit.


Her pic is on thousands of other sites, news, media, private, public, ETC ETC ET-fucking-CETERA.

Just relax.

[StuartD]

Originally posted by latinasojourn
sometimes i don't know why i bother trying to educate a few young people on the dangers of toying with the US DOJ.

Too funny, you're so paranoid that you're now getting all hot headed and calling us "young people" without even knowing the age of anyone at all. Are you going to start calling us "tards" next?

Originally posted by latinasojourn
i am refering to something that certain people in this thread are "begging for", namely to photoshop this image of a 17 year old in a sexually provocative way...

Truth of the matter is, no one can be arrested or charged for posting a picture that is "begging for" someone to photoshop it. That's like arresting someone for parking a car on a street because it would be like "begging for" someone to steal it.

If someone does photoshop it, they deal with the consequences if there are any, much like the person who steals a car. Not the person who parked it there.

[CDSmith]

If someone photoshops any famous person's pic and displays it publicly they run the risk of reprisals. That's no secret.

If someone's going to alter that image (and they haven't.... yet), they take the risk themselves, not beergood, and certainly not GFY.


Sorry, next argument.

[CDSmith]

Christ I'm 41, I should be thankful that someone is calling me "young people"

[Serge Litehead]

these girls were under 18 for sure when pics were taken, they are russian pop stars, and yeah they sing lots about love and some sexual oriented stuff, pics taken from their offical site.

[steve_cobra]

Well. Now we are all really in some shit.

[latinasojourn]

"legal shmegal advice shit"

you can call it whatever you want, i merely copied without alteration appropriate passages of 2257.

it's obvious to me that folks on this board have never read it, or are unwilling to give it any importance.

many of those people who have ignored this law are now behind bars in federal prisons.

you guys can laugh it off all you want. if you read my post it was very specific and my point dealt the idea of risky pastimes.

was not on a soapbox, but i felt the topic was important enough for discussion, because a trivializing of the issue could have an impact on some people's lives.

no condescension intended.

have good night

[latinasojourn]

Originally posted by holograph
these girls were under 18 for sure when pics were taken, they are russian pop stars, and yeah they sing lots about love and some sexual oriented stuff, pics taken from their offical site.

sigh....

if people understood 2257 they would understand that NONE of these images are relevant---they are all legal.

are you guys really adult webmasters, or just kids living in mom's basement?

[StuartD]

Originally posted by holograph

Amazing.. apparently we're all gonna do hard time because someone posted a picture of a girl eating a banana and yet Maxim magazine can shoot even younger girls with no shirt on and publish sell thousands of copies of it.

Hmmm... yup, we're all in big trouble now.

[DarkJedi]

Originally posted by Jdoughs
Isnt she like 17?

if so..I wouldnt be posting pics of her here

[steve_cobra]

[IMG]http://img16.*******/img16/2118/39154820.jpg[/IMG]

[CDSmith]

Originally posted by latinasojourn
you can call it whatever you want, i merely copied without alteration appropriate passages of 2257.

it's obvious to me that folks on this board have never read it, or are unwilling to give it any importance.

many of those people who have ignored this law are now behind bars in federal prisons.

you guys can laugh it off all you want. if you read my post it was very specific and my point dealt the idea of risky pastimes.

was not on a soapbox, but i felt the topic was important enough for discussion, because a trivializing of the issue could have an impact on some people's lives.

no condescension intended.

have good night

Fair enough then. But one of the key problems with your little tirade as I see it is that no one has yet photoshopped the banana pic you keep harping on about.

[Serge Litehead]

Originally posted by latinasojourn
"legal shmegal advice shit"

you can call it whatever you want, i merely copied without alteration appropriate passages of 2257.

it's obvious to me that folks on this board have never read it, or are unwilling to give it any importance.

many of those people who have ignored this law are now behind bars in federal prisons.

you guys can laugh it off all you want. if you read my post it was very specific and my point dealt the idea of risky pastimes.

was not on a soapbox, but i felt the topic was important enough for discussion, because a trivializing of the issue could have an impact on some people's lives.

no condescension intended.

have good night

what's wrong with a young girl having banana?

[steve_cobra]

Originally posted by CDSmith
Fair enough then. But one of the key problems with your little tirade as I see it is that no one has yet photoshopped the banana pic you keep harping on about.

Anyone with even average intelligence knows that arguments based off of "slippery slopes" are totally worthless and worthy of ridicule.

[CDSmith]

Originally posted by DarkJedi

SCORE!

[prostock]

Originally posted by DarkJedi

[silent moan]

I just see a girl who's totally obsess with a ..........banana?