Miss GFY - Should she be disqualified or not? - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

CDSmith · 06-24-2004, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
The rules do not say you have to see the logo.

Right there is what decides this issue for me. The first time I saw her entry pic I did notice right away that the GFY logo wasn't visible, and come to think of it that is partly why I didn't include her in my five votes.

But if it ain't in the rules, then her pic should stand.

It's a non-issue from where I sit.

Ice · 06-24-2004, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by angeleyes
oh, just let her resubmit..

and btw iceboy, I am "wearing them" on my finger.

Yeah you were for the two seconds to take the pic and then you pulled them back on that finger like a rubber band and flung them at me

chemicaleyes · 06-24-2004, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MandyBlake
I think we should just keep her in.
What is she going to submit another pic for? Would we be voting all over again? Just let her move on. She didn't break any rules.

NBDesign · 06-24-2004, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chemicaleyes
and she's shown another pic in this thread showing the logo, you can go ahead and shut up now.

So i guess that pic was submitted after the fact that there was debate started so that is not the one she submitted for the contest or there would not be a discussion on this... right?

Digipimp · 06-24-2004, 04:30 PM

resubmitting is the worst idea of all. maybe all the girls can resubmit, maybe we can just cancel the whole thing.

PrivateIvy · 06-24-2004, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by VegasSEGirl
Don't like the competition?

Anyways, while it was implied in the rules that you see the logo, it wasn't stated. I don't think you can disqualify her for not being as astute as some of the other contestants

LOL...Bo is very sexy, and we must think alike because I shot in a shop with a 73 Bronco and grease smeared on me as well

No...no competition.... I was stating my opinion on this issue and it has nothing to do with her. Even if she were disqualified I have nothing to gain by that, I was way down on votes...so no competition issue here LOL

I just think that in the spirit of GFY , the logo should be shown.

Carry on... And Bo, I agree it was a very sexy pic! You look smokin hot in it !! I had some pics that I didn't show the logo in as well, that I thought were sexier than my entry on.

Ivy

Basic_man · 06-24-2004, 04:31 PM

She is hot, Didn't break the rules!

WebDork · 06-24-2004, 04:33 PM

Didnt break any rule - unless can be proven she wasnt in GFY top and panties. Perhaps another couple of photos from same set would prove this.

Perhaps the competition organisers need to be more specific in what they want moving forward :D

chemicaleyes · 06-24-2004, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NBDesign
So i guess that pic was submitted after the fact that there was debate started so that is not the one she submitted for the contest or there would not be a discussion on this... right?

Why is this being brought up now? why not when the pics were first seen by adult.com? as before you can shut up now.

Ice · 06-24-2004, 04:33 PM

I feel sorry for Lens. What started out as a fun idea is turning into a complete clusterfuck. Im sure Lens is sitting there scratching his head wondering how we come up with the nit picky things we type as a response. There has not been one round of this competition that hasn't had some drama around it.

When it's done we should all chip in and pay for the holes in Len's office created from him beating his head against the walls

Jill_J · 06-24-2004, 04:33 PM

she has to stay `cause the rules didn`t specify the logo has to be visible

VegasSEGirl · 06-24-2004, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
LOL...Bo is very sexy, and we must think alike because I shot in a shop with a 73 Bronco and grease smeared on me as well

No...no competition.... I was stating my opinion on this issue and it has nothing to do with her. Even if she were disqualified I have nothing to gain by that, I was way down on votes...so no competition issue here LOL

I just think that in the spirit of GFY , the logo should be shown.

Carry on... And Bo, I agree it was a very sexy pic! You look smokin hot in it !! I had some pics that I didn't show the logo in as well, that I thought were sexier than my entry on.

Ivy

Now that answer sounds alot more diplomatic lol.

Theo · 06-24-2004, 04:34 PM

i didnt know the pic belongs to NakedBo

ban(g) her!

Digipimp · 06-24-2004, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chemicaleyes
Why is this being brought up now? why not when the pics were first seen by adult.com? as before you can shut up now.

take a wild guess, ummm maybe complaints from other girls. if it was a problem the adult.com people would have handled it before the voting began and when she submitted the pic. it's sad that it's even being brought to the board for a poll or discussion, it's sad that they think she should resubmit, unfair to her and the others and so on.

Joesho · 06-24-2004, 04:36 PM

Keep her in, this is very petty, and is not a valid reason.

we have not been dealing with specifics thus far, why now?

I VOTE STAY!

Giorgio_Xo · 06-24-2004, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NakedBo
I posted one in this thread, and if I have to resubmit the girls who didn't wear it should do that too. I swear that if I knew that this was an issue I would have submitted an other one. Why is this brought up after the voting. I submitted mine on time, and if you would have said that it had to show the logo I would have send you guys another one.

xox

Relax. He is cutting you a fair deal. The simple fact Lensman questioned your submissions mean he thinks there are grounds for bumping you. He gave you a second chance. Accept it.

Trixie · 06-24-2004, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NakedBo
I posted one in this thread, and if I have to resubmit the girls who didn't wear it should do that too. I swear that if I knew that this was an issue I would have submitted an other one. Why is this brought up after the voting. I submitted mine on time, and if you would have said that it had to show the logo I would have send you guys another one.

xox

I agree. If this was an issue it should have been brought up BEFORE the voting at the same time as the controversy about Alysha's fisting pic (which I think should have stayed in too).

Let's just move onto the next round without disqualifying anyone else on an unwritten technicality. Although I think the logo should be showing, it should have been addressed sooner if it was going to be grounds for disqualification.

Vanilla DeVille · 06-24-2004, 04:37 PM

I agree that the logo should have been the focus of every girls entry. However, Bo did not break any LISTED rules, and nothing was mentioned at the time of entry allowing her to make a change (like the chance given to the fisting picture entry). So, I think she should be allowed to stay. If she is disqualified, they have to be that strict with every entry in every round (no double-standards, treat every entry the same).

Orgasmics · 06-24-2004, 04:38 PM

Everything I'll say has been in one post or another, but I'm adding my input anyways.

She followed the written rules... she's in her GFY tank and panties. Nothing was specified about the logo having to be visible. Granted, if I were in the contest I would have been sure to show the logo. Regardless, she broke no written rules. If it was so important that the logo be shown, it should have been stated clearly in the rules.

To sum it all up, she shouldn't be disqualified because of vague rules.

Holly · 06-24-2004, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NBDesign
But then again... these girls are not the brightest bulbs on the billboard.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you one of the board harddicks who spends and inordinate amount of time with his tongue up the ass of some of these "dim bulbs"?

I apologize if it's not you, but I'm thinking you are the valiant Knight who rides in to save bulbs like Heather Hampton and the like, all in the hopes of some free imaginary fuck or personalized jackoff material.

If I'm thinking of someone else, I apologize. Let me know if you're not the hero I was referring to, and I'll even make a thread saying I'm sorry.

SureFire · 06-24-2004, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MandyBlake
I think we should just keep her in.
What is she going to submit another pic for? Would we be voting all over again? Just let her move on. She didn't break any rules.

I agree with you.

xxxdesign-net · 06-24-2004, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy

I just think that in the spirit of GFY , the logo should be shown.

Ivy

its funny to see how much (some)girls congratulate each others all the time... saying things like..."you look smokin' hot" .. "you are so adorable" . "where's my sexy girlies at?" ... and yet... when one is in trouble.... their solidarity seems to evaporate pretty quickly... lol

NakedBo · 06-24-2004, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
Relax. He is cutting you a fair deal. The simple fact Lensman questioned your submissions mean he thinks there are grounds for bumping you. He gave you a second chance. Accept it.

I know, and I will if they want me too. It sounded a bit harder then it was ment to be. I just think this is unfair.

emthree · 06-24-2004, 04:44 PM

Funny how most of the other contestants want her out. I think she should stay, but keep this incident in mind for the future.

BTW: you guys got owned when she posted the front view

CyberTraffic · 06-24-2004, 04:44 PM

No, she should not be disqualified.

Don't we all have something better to do with our time?

Oh, wait, no we don't.

CrazyNakedChick · 06-24-2004, 04:45 PM

the rules for this round were a bit vague, keep her in.

if it were up to me i would probably be a bit more specific in future rounds though, hehe.

SureFire · 06-24-2004, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Holly
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you one of the board harddicks who spends and inordinate amount of time with his tongue up the ass of some of these "dim bulbs"?

I apologize if it's not you, but I'm thinking you are the valiant Knight who rides in to save bulbs like Heather Hampton and the like, all in the hopes of some free imaginary fuck or personalized jackoff material.

If I'm thinking of someone else, I apologize. Let me know if you're not the hero I was referring to, and I'll even make a thread saying I'm sorry.

I am thinking the same thing. Thanks for saving me the words.

Tam · 06-24-2004, 04:46 PM

I say let her stay..... the rules didn't specifically say that it had to be visible and that is a loophole that was not forseen, making it not her fault..... If it was specific that it had to be visible, rather than just implied that it would be, I'd say disqualify her, but it didn't say that.

ArikaAmes · 06-24-2004, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emthree
Funny how most of the other contestants want her out. I think she should stay, but keep this incident in mind for the future.

BTW: you guys got owned when she posted the front view

that's great

TheWildcard · 06-24-2004, 04:49 PM

Let her stay

NakedBo · 06-24-2004, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emthree
Funny how most of the other contestants want her out. I think she should stay, but keep this incident in mind for the future.

BTW: you guys got owned when she posted the front view

Thank you

Biggy2 · 06-24-2004, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
if you wanted the logo's showcased you should have said so, no need to throw someone out because people are crying about it now.

if it didn't say "YOU MUST SHOW THE LOGO, etc" - you cannot throw her out.

you can only disqualify the person if they broke the rule. Nothing can be assumed or implied, it must be spelled out clearly.

Stewie · 06-24-2004, 04:54 PM

I voted for her to stay - everyone else has already stated the obvious reasons why...

Suggestion for future rounds: All disqualifications should be made before the voting is started (whether they are instantly disqualified, or all bad entries are given 24 hours to resubmit). No sense voting on disappearing entries.

ModelBuffet · 06-24-2004, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by webair
stay

everyone deserves a second chance make her resubmit a pic with logo shown

Yeah I vote for this !!

kush · 06-24-2004, 04:59 PM

bah.

No sense me insulting the intelligence of 1/3 of the people who voted in this thread

kush · 06-24-2004, 05:02 PM

edit.

Sly_RJ · 06-24-2004, 05:04 PM

Sweet! I was waiting for something like this to happen! Women are too damn competitive for an issue like this not to come up!

I want to see fighting!

tony286 · 06-24-2004, 05:07 PM

I am sorry for posting so late but I actually had to work all doay shooting, I like sitting at the computer fucking off much better lol. If it was a problem it should of been a problem when she sent the picture in. Why wait til after the contest is over makes no sense. Wait I forgot this is the online adult industry whats wrong with me lol.

chemicaleyes · 06-24-2004, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
take a wild guess, ummm maybe complaints from other girls. if it was a problem the adult.com people would have handled it before the voting began and when she submitted the pic. it's sad that it's even being brought to the board for a poll or discussion, it's sad that they think she should resubmit, unfair to her and the others and so on.

Thx for that but I didn't need answers to those questions, they were to shut up NBDesign and they seemed to work.

NaughtyJenn · 06-24-2004, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Sweet! I was waiting for something like this to happen! Women are too damn competitive for an issue like this not to come up!

I want to see fighting!

im not giving back your purse!

CAT FIGHT!!!

chri$tian · 06-24-2004, 05:12 PM

Let her stay... IF she was ugly, then kick here out...

Ice · 06-24-2004, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NaughtyJenn
im not giving back your purse!

CAT FIGHT!!!

Tom_PMs · 06-24-2004, 05:14 PM

This thread is a poll that is apparently deciding the issue, and so far 80% + agree that it wasnt a techincal breaking of the stated rules.
Too many beautiful women for me to vote anyway, but I voted for the letter of the rules, rather than the implied, in the poll.

NBDesign · 06-24-2004, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Holly
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you one of the board harddicks who spends and inordinate amount of time with his tongue up the ass of some of these "dim bulbs"?

I apologize if it's not you, but I'm thinking you are the valiant Knight who rides in to save bulbs like Heather Hampton and the like, all in the hopes of some free imaginary fuck or personalized jackoff material.

If I'm thinking of someone else, I apologize. Let me know if you're not the hero I was referring to, and I'll even make a thread saying I'm sorry.

so i stuck up for heather... so what? I got nothing from it... nothing. your point? so one dim buld... not many... and no I did not have my tongue up her ass... would not put my tongue in anyones ass,,, that is just gross.

Sly_RJ · 06-24-2004, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NaughtyJenn
im not giving back your purse!

CAT FIGHT!!!

Listen up BITCH! I'm very proud of my pink purse and I went through hell to get the damn thing. I'm getting it back!

Psst... we'll post the fight video on NaughtySly.com

Cassie · 06-24-2004, 05:15 PM

Argument against:
The rules do not say you have to see the logo.

there's your answer

Spunky · 06-24-2004, 05:17 PM

No Logo=No Luck...

TurboAngel · 06-24-2004, 05:17 PM

I say keep her in.

SomeCreep · 06-24-2004, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Big debate in our office.

Argument for disqualification:
Some think she should be disqualified because the GFY logo is not in the pic and "it's a given" that it should be.

Argument against:
The rules do not say you have to see the logo.

Let the masses decide!

Make no mistake, she is hot as hell! But do no vote on that.

Here are the Round 3 instructions:
ROUND THREE CHALLENGE: This rounds challenge is to produce the best pic of yourself in the GFY tank top and panties. The best pic wins the $500 round 3 prize. 10 Girls will be knocked out this round. Since we are mailing the clothes, the round will end on June 11.

Disqualified for something the rules do not state? Of course she should NOT be disqualified.

emmanuelle · 06-24-2004, 05:21 PM

If you dont specify it, it isnt a rule

View Poll Results: Is not showing the GFY logo breaking the rules?
Broke the rules	87	27.36%
Didn't break the rules	231	72.64%
Voters: 318. You may not vote on this poll

06-24-2004, 04:30 PM	#105
Digipimp BP4L OT DL Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: BP4L Swap Meet Posts: 13,481	resubmitting is the worst idea of all. maybe all the girls can resubmit, maybe we can just cancel the whole thing. __________________ Still Hosting at Webair and You Should Be Too

06-24-2004, 04:31 PM	#107
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	She is hot, Didn't break the rules! __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

06-24-2004, 04:33 PM	#108
WebDork Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 402	Didnt break any rule - unless can be proven she wasnt in GFY top and panties. Perhaps another couple of photos from same set would prove this. Perhaps the competition organisers need to be more specific in what they want moving forward :D __________________ Video Ipod Porn Site with Affiliate Program. http://www.podies.com Free 1:1 Adult Webmaster Banner Exchange.

06-24-2004, 04:33 PM	#110
Ice Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sunny California Posts: 26,053	I feel sorry for Lens. What started out as a fun idea is turning into a complete clusterfuck. Im sure Lens is sitting there scratching his head wondering how we come up with the nit picky things we type as a response. There has not been one round of this competition that hasn't had some drama around it. When it's done we should all chip in and pay for the holes in Len's office created from him beating his head against the walls __________________ icq 1904905 Last edited by iceicebaby; 06-24-2004 at 04:34 PM..

06-24-2004, 04:33 PM	#111
Jill_J Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 3,599	she has to stay `cause the rules didn`t specify the logo has to be visible __________________ Cash Maniacs - around 50 sites, all niches!

06-24-2004, 04:34 PM	#113
Theo HAL 9000 Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 34,515	i didnt know the pic belongs to NakedBo ban(g) her!

06-24-2004, 04:36 PM	#115
Joesho want to get in shape Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: on the lake Posts: 12,329	Keep her in, this is very petty, and is not a valid reason. we have not been dealing with specifics thus far, why now? I VOTE STAY! __________________ Got any domains to sell? I proudly host all my stuff at www.rackco.com

06-24-2004, 04:37 PM	#118
Vanilla DeVille Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Scottsdale, Arizona! Posts: 8,097	I agree that the logo should have been the focus of every girls entry. However, Bo did not break any LISTED rules, and nothing was mentioned at the time of entry allowing her to make a change (like the chance given to the fisting picture entry). So, I think she should be allowed to stay. If she is disqualified, they have to be that strict with every entry in every round (no double-standards, treat every entry the same). __________________ Kisses, Vanilla DeVille SKYPE: vanilladeville DeVilleDigital Twitter

06-24-2004, 04:38 PM	#119
Orgasmics Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 1,205	Everything I'll say has been in one post or another, but I'm adding my input anyways. She followed the written rules... she's in her GFY tank and panties. Nothing was specified about the logo having to be visible. Granted, if I were in the contest I would have been sure to show the logo. Regardless, she broke no written rules. If it was so important that the logo be shown, it should have been stated clearly in the rules. To sum it all up, she shouldn't be disqualified because of vague rules.

06-24-2004, 04:44 PM	#124
emthree Dialer Kingpin Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: New York Posts: 10,816	Funny how most of the other contestants want her out. I think she should stay, but keep this incident in mind for the future. BTW: you guys got owned when she posted the front view __________________ • Sell Patches & Pills •

06-24-2004, 04:44 PM	#125
CyberTraffic Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Traffic Land ~ ICQ:213666533 Posts: 2,187	No, she should not be disqualified. Don't we all have something better to do with our time? Oh, wait, no we don't.

06-24-2004, 04:45 PM	#126
CrazyNakedChick Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Infidelville Posts: 1,902	the rules for this round were a bit vague, keep her in. if it were up to me i would probably be a bit more specific in future rounds though, hehe. __________________ Addicted to Lingerie? Got Broadband? Click Here!

06-24-2004, 04:46 PM	#128
Tam Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: In your face Posts: 8,488	I say let her stay..... the rules didn't specifically say that it had to be visible and that is a loophole that was not forseen, making it not her fault..... If it was specific that it had to be visible, rather than just implied that it would be, I'd say disqualify her, but it didn't say that.

06-24-2004, 04:49 PM	#130
TheWildcard So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 4,759	Let her stay

06-24-2004, 04:54 PM	#133
Stewie Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: In bed with Vanilla Posts: 3,670	I voted for her to stay - everyone else has already stated the obvious reasons why... Suggestion for future rounds: All disqualifications should be made before the voting is started (whether they are instantly disqualified, or all bad entries are given 24 hours to resubmit). No sense voting on disappearing entries.

06-24-2004, 04:59 PM	#135
kush Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,382	bah. No sense me insulting the intelligence of 1/3 of the people who voted in this thread Last edited by kush; 06-24-2004 at 05:01 PM..

06-24-2004, 05:02 PM	#136
kush Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,382	edit.

06-24-2004, 05:04 PM	#137
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	Sweet! I was waiting for something like this to happen! Women are too damn competitive for an issue like this not to come up! I want to see fighting! __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

06-24-2004, 05:07 PM	#138
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	I am sorry for posting so late but I actually had to work all doay shooting, I like sitting at the computer fucking off much better lol. If it was a problem it should of been a problem when she sent the picture in. Why wait til after the contest is over makes no sense. Wait I forgot this is the online adult industry whats wrong with me lol.

06-24-2004, 05:12 PM	#141
chri$tian Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Charleston, SC Posts: 2,468	Let her stay... IF she was ugly, then kick here out... __________________ http://www.3dsex.com

06-24-2004, 05:14 PM	#143
Tom_PMs Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,049	This thread is a poll that is apparently deciding the issue, and so far 80% + agree that it wasnt a techincal breaking of the stated rules. Too many beautiful women for me to vote anyway, but I voted for the letter of the rules, rather than the implied, in the poll.

06-24-2004, 05:15 PM	#146
Cassie Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 3,139	Argument against: The rules do not say you have to see the logo. there's your answer __________________ ICQ: 309756847 ]

06-24-2004, 05:17 PM	#147
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,944	No Logo=No Luck... __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE* Last edited by Spunky; 06-24-2004 at 05:18 PM..

06-24-2004, 05:17 PM	#148
TurboAngel H.B.I.C. Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: NC Posts: 30,122	I say keep her in.

06-24-2004, 05:21 PM	#150
emmanuelle Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Oh Canada! Posts: 3,662	If you dont specify it, it isnt a rule