when was the last manned moon landing - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 04:43 AM

no no.. look at the helmet.. you see the light source there, (sun), but how can the shadow go towards the sun? thats.. erhm. not possible.. also remember they didnt have flashlight

More Booze · 06-23-2004, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fabuleux
Shadows look ok, but I agree with the light source. Give me a sec on that one haha.

He just got a flashlight up his ass

Fabuleux · 06-23-2004, 04:52 AM

Although this is a funny conversation, you all should check this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_...ax_accusations

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 04:57 AM

quote from the above page:
"Shadows on the Moon are complicated because there are several light sources; the Sun, Earth and the Moon itself"

yeah right.. the light source of the earth is brighter than the one from the sun..
so much blabla on that page ;)

Fabuleux · 06-23-2004, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker

and something is so wrong in this pic.. look at the light source and the shadows..

http://www.clavius.org/manmoon.html

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 05:04 AM

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 05:05 AM

same

Fabuleux · 06-23-2004, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
same

http://www.clavius.org/a11rear.html

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 05:13 AM

what about that?

Fabuleux · 06-23-2004, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
what about that?

You don't give up do you?

I don't know what that is.

tdp-Cool-content · 06-23-2004, 05:16 AM

If the moon landing is not true, ther must bee at least a 100 people that know about it.. how can they keep ther mouth shoot 4 so longe?

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fabuleux
You don't give up do you?
I don't know what that is.

no, i dont give up ;)

arcording to nasa, they made 2 videos at DIFFERENT location at a different time. but as you see, its the same location.

you should watch the "Fox TV and the Apollo Moon Hoax" "Did We Land on the Moon?" to understand better

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by tdp-Cool-content
If the moon landing is not true, ther must bee at least a 100 people that know about it.. how can they keep ther mouth shoot 4 so longe?

why 100 people? just some need to be involved.. (the "actors")..

quote: "10 astronauts died "under mysterious circumstances" during Apollo".... stronaut deaths: Ed Givens (car accident), Ted Freeman (T-38 crash), C. C. Williams (T-38 accident), Elliot See and Charlie Bassett (T-38 accident), Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee (Apollo 1 fire). .. etc.

tdp-Cool-content · 06-23-2004, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
why 100 people? just some need to be involved.. (the "actors")..

quote: "10 astronauts died "under mysterious circumstances" during Apollo".... stronaut deaths: Ed Givens (car accident), Ted Freeman (T-38 crash), C. C. Williams (T-38 accident), Elliot See and Charlie Bassett (T-38 accident), Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee (Apollo 1 fire). .. etc.

now that's some spooky shit....

MrJackMeHoff · 06-23-2004, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fabuleux
Try to jump that high with a suite that heavy.

Dude its a fake suit prolly weighs nothing you fucking retard geez.

Peacemaker · 06-23-2004, 05:35 AM

Fabuleux: i ll come back later, need to go.. nice discussion ;)

KRL · 06-23-2004, 05:36 AM

I wouldn't put it past our government to have faked the moon landings. But there were several of them if you recall, and with that many people involved it'd be tough to keep that big of a farse secret.

MrJackMeHoff · 06-23-2004, 05:42 AM

Please disregard the fucking retard comment I lost my mind there. Sorry.

MrJackMeHoff · 06-23-2004, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
I wouldn't put it past our government to have faked the moon landings. But there were several of them if you recall, and with that many people involved it'd be tough to keep that big of a farse secret.

Theres alot of people who havn't kept it secret but since the the gob'ment said its true its "true".

StuartD · 06-23-2004, 06:25 AM

All of that stuff is suspect.... highly.

Here's the one thing that's always baffled me...

I borrowed this image, now... all the obvious things aside, look under the lander. This lander uses 25000 pounds of thrust under that thing... let's say while landing that it uses only a fraction of that even. Well, on a surface that is nothing but loose and very dry dirt.... uhmm.... would it really look that nice and tidy? Wouldn't there be a bit of a crater or something????

StuartD · 06-23-2004, 06:29 AM

oh yeah, forgot to answer the question.

It's my opinion, based on my own observations, plus as everyone else has said... the fact that nasa, it seems, hasn't been able to put anyone on the moon since... that the last lunar landing has actually yet to happen.

I believe, with 99% assuradness, that there has been no lunar landing yet.

Global Dialers · 06-23-2004, 10:49 AM

so whats the consensus we were duped or not?

KRL · 06-23-2004, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Global Dialers
so whats the consensus we were duped or not?

That's like asking the question "Who really killed Kennedy?"

We're never going to know the truth.

jade_dragon · 06-23-2004, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fabuleux
Simpel question. There are no satellites? Without you couldn't have seen the war in Iraq live. There circle in a 0.000001mm precise orbit. First satillite was broadcasting data 4th october of 1957.
A launch from the moon costs far less energy then a launch from earth, there is no atmosphere and gravity is 7 times lower.

getting something into orbit is not the problem, all you have to do for there is get past the atmosphere and the gravitational pull will allow it to stay in orbit. This is why we have the moon. The problem is getting it all to line up, from here to the moon orbit, shuttle to lander, lander to moon, lander to shuttle, shuttle to earth. Sorry to many limiting reagants such as the efficiency of the fuel, the mass of the vehicles you are talking about, and the limitations of the pilots life support systems.

The space suits are said to be kinda heavy but i can not remember the exact weight, i guess if you took the weight of the suit, did some math to figure out how much force the astranauts could produce by jumping in it and took into account the lower gravity you could tell if the jump height was correct.......

jade_dragon · 06-23-2004, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fabuleux
The fastest airplaine ever build is the Lockheed Martin SR-71A Blackbird and it's first flight was in 1965. Don't think we didn't have the knowlegde back then.

By the way, I study Flight and airospace technology

actually the maiden flight was 1959 it started regular recon in 64......

GotGauge · 06-23-2004, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dodint
http://www.moontruth.com/clips/moontruth.mpg

OMG!

STiNKyMeAT · 06-23-2004, 01:39 PM

So.. Why dont we get one of our fancy telescopes, zoom in on the moon and look for that flag we supposedly left there?.... Problem solved.

MrJackMeHoff · 06-23-2004, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by STiNKyMeAT
So.. Why dont we get one of our fancy telescopes, zoom in on the moon and look for that flag we supposedly left there?.... Problem solved.

We've already tried and no on has ever found evidence we were there. Including the fact we supposedly left the botton of the lander and a fucking car!

hydro · 06-27-2004, 12:44 AM

it wouldnt suprise me if it was faked.

venturi · 06-27-2004, 01:14 AM

Form your own opinions based upon facts... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

Corleone · 06-27-2004, 01:19 AM

and what da hell is that?!

TurboTrucker · 06-27-2004, 01:25 AM

Funny how the 'wind' only 'blows' the flag when an astronaut is moving the flagpole around. Show me the flag blowing without anybody shaking the flagpole.

Quote:

Originally posted by MrJackMeHoff

Here is the wind blowing flag:

http://www.ufos-aliens.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Apollo1.rm

pornguy · 06-27-2004, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
same

While your theory of the light looks good at first glance, I hate to say, that most likely you are wrong on this.

For that path to be correct ( the one you have drawn) the light source would have to have been VERY close to your converging point. To make those shadows have the correct angle as you say.

MaDalton · 06-27-2004, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dodint
http://www.moontruth.com/clips/moontruth.mpg

that's fuckin great - i laughed tears!

06-23-2004, 04:43 AM	#51
Peacemaker Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mars Posts: 897	no no.. look at the helmet.. you see the light source there, (sun), but how can the shadow go towards the sun? thats.. erhm. not possible.. also remember they didnt have flashlight __________________ SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and tools

06-23-2004, 04:52 AM	#53
Fabuleux Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 2,543	Although this is a funny conversation, you all should check this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_...ax_accusations __________________

06-23-2004, 04:57 AM	#54
Peacemaker Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mars Posts: 897	quote from the above page: "Shadows on the Moon are complicated because there are several light sources; the Sun, Earth and the Moon itself" yeah right.. the light source of the earth is brighter than the one from the sun.. so much blabla on that page ;) __________________ SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and tools

06-23-2004, 05:04 AM	#56
Peacemaker Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mars Posts: 897	! __________________ SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and tools

06-23-2004, 05:05 AM	#57
Peacemaker Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mars Posts: 897	same __________________ SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and tools

06-23-2004, 05:13 AM	#59
Peacemaker Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mars Posts: 897	what about that? __________________ SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and tools

06-23-2004, 05:16 AM	#61
tdp-Cool-content Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Out there Posts: 321	If the moon landing is not true, ther must bee at least a 100 people that know about it.. how can they keep ther mouth shoot 4 so longe? __________________ Webmaster Content Cool-content Webmaster Resources cool-XXXresources

06-23-2004, 05:35 AM	#66
Peacemaker Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mars Posts: 897	Fabuleux: i ll come back later, need to go.. nice discussion ;) __________________ SEO since 2002 - Google Index Record: 32 minutes. - Selling SEO services and tools

06-23-2004, 05:36 AM	#67
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	I wouldn't put it past our government to have faked the moon landings. But there were several of them if you recall, and with that many people involved it'd be tough to keep that big of a farse secret. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

06-23-2004, 05:42 AM	#68
MrJackMeHoff Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: LOLLIPOP ISLAND =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Posts: 4,569	Please disregard the fucking retard comment I lost my mind there. Sorry. __________________

06-23-2004, 06:25 AM	#70
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	All of that stuff is suspect.... highly. Here's the one thing that's always baffled me... I borrowed this image, now... all the obvious things aside, look under the lander. This lander uses 25000 pounds of thrust under that thing... let's say while landing that it uses only a fraction of that even. Well, on a surface that is nothing but loose and very dry dirt.... uhmm.... would it really look that nice and tidy? Wouldn't there be a bit of a crater or something???? __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-23-2004, 06:29 AM	#71
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	oh yeah, forgot to answer the question. It's my opinion, based on my own observations, plus as everyone else has said... the fact that nasa, it seems, hasn't been able to put anyone on the moon since... that the last lunar landing has actually yet to happen. I believe, with 99% assuradness, that there has been no lunar landing yet. __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-23-2004, 10:49 AM	#72
Global Dialers Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Spain Posts: 1,349	so whats the consensus we were duped or not? __________________ the hun gets revenue from pre-paid gallery placements on the top 15 spaces and banners. the rest of thegalleries are free placements.

06-23-2004, 01:39 PM	#77
STiNKyMeAT Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Kansass Posts: 167	So.. Why dont we get one of our fancy telescopes, zoom in on the moon and look for that flag we supposedly left there?.... Problem solved. __________________ !!TNACASH.COM!!

06-27-2004, 12:44 AM	#79
hydro Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Dirty 3rd Posts: 4,216	it wouldnt suprise me if it was faked.

06-27-2004, 01:14 AM	#80
venturi Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: An Oasis atop a High Desert Mesa Posts: 386	Form your own opinions based upon facts... http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html __________________ I'm not a porn monger. I'm a porn ... STYLIST! Buildit Cheap, build it Fast, Build it Right. - Pick Two.

06-27-2004, 01:19 AM	#81
Corleone C.R.E.A.M Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 15,262	and what da hell is that?!