thats so lame.. I guess they chose such a silly and base name because it is such a trite and well repudiated slur on anyone that says different things than you do. I think Ann coulter is a crazy psycho nutbag that would only squeeze america into a continent shaped turd.. but it would still be childish to say she hates america. yeah it'll probably work to get people riled up because it's such a stupid and text book reactionary assertion.
Getting thousands of lefties going "you're sooooo stupid" lol. I hope thats why they're doing it at any rate, because anyone that actually believes that should be shot in the face and stop stealing everyone else's air.

Why does that not surprise me...Danny boy. The pot has destroyed whatever brain power you ever had.

I'm pretty sure walmarts success has less to do with low cost goods than it does with human resource management. Hiring mostly part timers who get no benefits, making full timers wait 6 months for benefits, and turning them over before they are due for benefits and salary increases anyway, hehe.
I'm betting they are also classified as "at will" employees (ie: no unemployment).

But maybe it's both. Or neither. I'm just bored.

IF only iq tests were required before running .




:1orglaugh

Mike - you take sides like a sheep, think for yourself man..

BOTH sides have assholes, Moore is just one of 'em. Do you HONESTLY think that the people he's slamming are any better?

The world is fucked up man.. Sitting back and pointing fingers at each other just makes it worse - you're essentially doing the same thing by starting this thread.

I think we'd all rather have you posting pictures of your cool stuff, pretty wife or piles of money. Take a poll, betcha I win :Graucho

Dennis I am with you.

I knew there were a lot of Moore fans here, so I was hoping they would take the time to look at all sides.

pick on someone your own size and brainpower, you crippled up momma's boy. You have nothing that interests me.

What an amateurish piece of crap.. just watched the 2 trailers... and we have no clue what this documentary will be about.. is this amateur gonna try to expose Moore's lies in details...? Doesnt look like it.. Is it a documentary telling us how america is great!? This amateur is using Moore's name along with the fanatism of conservatives that will surely buy his crap... to make $$...

It now seems easy to get the media attention..

lol

Thats the furthest thing from the truth. You might want to brush up on the political parties.

Is that why there are typically more taxes during a democratic president?

I think a lot of people need to brush up on politics. People seem to think the presidents change the economy. It's not, it is the congress and people like Greenspan who control our economy.

Democrats are known for throwing more money at any problem they can. I wish more people would just brush up on politics and read stories from both political parties.

Read the books from Sean Hannity, then read Alan Colmes book, they are both good starts.

It's a shame anyone would insult the small businesses, after all that was what this country was built on.

If there was ever a major nuclear war and we lost a large part of this country, people just would not know how to survive and
start over. They would be too busy fighting over crap like this or killing each other for electrical appliances that don't work anymore..





:BangBang:

:eek7

If you are against our president.. you are not patriotic and hate america...

:1orglaugh

Clinton = balanced budget, no deficit

Bush = biggest deficit in history.

You conservatives could fuck up a wet dream.

Honeyslut, nobody has anything against small businesses, the point is that if you're a fuckup, or you're just stupid, you don't deserve to be bailed out when your business inevitably collapses.

I hate Moore and I'm a proud American :)

let me guess: you and pathfinder have an underground cabin in the woods and an arms cache.

LOL.. talk about shooting yourself in the foot.. thats like saying "I wish you guys would brush up on politics - read Michael Moore or Al Franken as a good start"

That could also be because clinton was too busy getting his dick sucked instead of standing up to terrorists like Osama Bin Laden. We are in a deficit because we are at war, however its funny how the economy has been growing for 12 straight months at least.

Don't believe me? http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/op...ists/23173.htm

Yeah democrats never fuck up anything, lets not forget Jimmy Carter. There are good and bad to both parties, and yes I lean conservative on many issues but not all.

Hell Clinton was definitely no killer president thats for sure, but I would take him anyday over John Kerry (if it was only going to be a democrat). The man is a backstabber and he cannot make up his mind on anything.

He loved the military before he hated it.

If you want a "good idea", you should read Ann Coulter and Micheal Moore, Sean Hannity and Al Franken, Bill O'Reilly and John Pilger, Rush Limbaugh and Noam Chomsky and much more importantly.. everything in between and then come to some conclusions.

All I know, if Kerry is elected and theres another fake economy like under Clinton, I'm going to take advantage of it better.


The Clinton economy mirage was so good and people wanted it to be so true, that they just didn't see the reality of what was happening.

Html guys making 70k heh.

Clinton did more about Osama than Bush did until his hand was forced and he HAD to do something.

How is that shooting myself in the foot?

Sean Hannity is a conservative, Alan Colmes is a liberal. Read about both parties views, that was my point.

Most people around here follow the herd instead of forming their own opinion. Just because we are porn slingers people think we should be democrats. Sorry I love my money too much to let the democrats deal with it. However, there are some things I am liberal about. Too many people are ALL CONSERVATIVE or ALL LIBERAL. Most dont know the difference, and most just want to bash Bush instead of reading about how people like Kennedy (the senator), Daschle, Kerry and others have trully fucked up our great nation.

thats just commonsense supply and demand. In the early days they were like specialists, the fact that they don't earn that now has nothing to do with fake economies, it's every idiot studying IT for the last 5 years and a million 20 year olds out looking for html jobs that don't exist.

*dumps big bag of grainy salt on this thread*

:winkwink:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Lobbing a few missles into Afghanistan was sufficient? If so we would have had him and 9-11 might not have happened. I don't think Clinton did more than Bush, I think Bush still would have tackled Al-Qaeda just a little differently then when he was "forced" into it.

I think Clinton was too busy trying to spin the Lewinski shit and get his name in the paper instead of dealing with foreign policy and dealing with terrorist like Al-Qaeda. Just my 2cents.

To a point that is true, but alot of it was worthless dot com companies were just burning through ipo money with no hope whatsoever of making a profit.

Colmes is a bitch liberal hired by Fox to be Hannity's willing oral receptacle, and if you read more you'd know that Clinton's team told Bush's team that Osama was the primary threat against this country, and the incoming administration didn't want to hear anything about it, they wanted to go after pornographers.

wtf? you talk about him like he's the messiah ... is he giving you BJs under the table?

Alan Colmes is a stooge. He's not even on the radar as a liberal author, the only people that think he is a liberal worth taking notice of are Hannity fans because he's bland centre left.

9-11 happened under Bush because the Bush administration was clueless about foreign relations, didn't want to take any advice, killed ongoing anti-terrorism programs and left us vulnerable. Tell me if this sounds familiar to you:

BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO ATTACK INSIDE THE UNITED STATES

Do you know where that title comes from?

And Clinton wouldn't have been busy with Lewinski if the conservatives hadn't somehow stretched the whitewater investigation to cover blowjobs in the oval office. That whole investigation was the most blatant, corrupt and partisan abuse of power in my lifetime.

And yet it's still far more than Bush did until his hand was forced. Obviously Bush wasn't very far into his presidency but you should read into how the Bush team was treating the terrorist threat.. Clinton basically left office saying that terrorism was goingt o be the greatest threat, but Bush sat on policies and recommendations and started building missile defence shields as priorities remember?

It is pretty funny to blame Clinton for spending so much of his time occupied with the Lewinski matter when it's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain he would have preffered not being impeached and getting on with things lol. You could just as easily blame the republicans for forcing the administration to focus on Lewinski for so long, but that would be just as stupid.

Are you referring to Iraq, homeland security, Halliburton, weapon production, and presidents getting blowjobs?

Or could it be the S & L bailout, the millions funneled to bin laden, and Reagans funeral?

Do tell.

hey no argument here lol, the company I worked over 3 years for must have gone through at least 50 mil before they folded. It wasn't a stupid dot com though, just mismanaged.

C'mon dig do you really believe that? First off lets look at this. Colmes always has been and always will be a liberal. The fact that he uses his head unlike some hardcore liberals is why many don't like him, but he is a liberal regardless. He uses common sense unlike those staunch liberals or republicans for that matter. Anyone who makes up their mind without hearing the facts is just stupid regardless and many people on both sides of the fence do that.

Secondly Bush was in office for 9 mos when the attack happened. The FBI got a memo from an agent in August 2001. I am sure if he knew there was going to be an attack on the US in September, something would have been done ( i dont doubt this of any president).

I really don't believe that within 9mos a president can be judged on. He has been at war since the 9th month of his presidency, thus spending has been increased due to war, etc. The economy is coming back around and it has been proven. I don't think Bush nor the economy is doing that bad given the situation.

Lets not forget that with all this we also had tax cuts, and wow the economy is in the rebound as well.

For further debate, check this poll:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...pagen umber=1

Colmes is a milquetoast ass, a straw man whose job is to be knocked down every night.

You won't see Hannity trying to take on James Carville or Joe Conason anytime soon.

So which is it, you guys say the president doesnt have anything to do with the economy then you say Clintons fake economy. Make up your fucking minds.

Democrats make no apologies for massive government spending. For the government to provide a happy, healthy, shameless, and even exciting society, for everyone, regardless of their personal means, requires a massive amount of cash from the citizens as well as all that can be borrowed. Further, to make sure that no citizen gets into trouble and is in bed each night at a reasonable hour, a huge government staff is a necessity. This, of course, requires every dime the public can spare and just a bit more.


Just for those of you are economists and are talking about when the recession started:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

:thumbsup man with the balls to speak out