better get your 2257 shit in order - GoFuckYourself.com

tony286 · 06-14-2004, 03:12 PM

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...0 Pornography

StuartD · 06-14-2004, 03:16 PM

Not sure how up to date this is lately, but if you have content from a provider on this list that is showing non-compliant, you had better start contacting them right away.

Compliant Content Providers

Kimmykim · 06-14-2004, 03:16 PM

"The proposed rule tightens the list of acceptable forms of identification, scrapping college IDs and selective service cards. It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Um, what is this shit? You have to keep the ID now? That's not going to work, models are totally transient to the business and in life for the most part. How many content providers couldn't find half the girls that have worked for them if they had to?

cherrylula · 06-14-2004, 03:19 PM

Big brother wants more info on pornographers.

Be sure to vote BUSH in 2004 so they can get their way!

In fact, someone should launch "pornographers for bush," make t-shirts and donate the $ to his re-election campaign.

freeadultcontent · 06-14-2004, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
"The proposed rule tightens the list of acceptable forms of identification, scrapping college IDs and selective service cards. It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Um, what is this shit? You have to keep the ID now? That's not going to work, models are totally transient to the business and in life for the most part. How many content providers couldn't find half the girls that have worked for them if they had to?

Kimmykin you lost me. We have always had to keep a copy of the ID. Not sure about most shooters, but we have always insisted on two forms of Government ID, ussually a license or state issued ID card and something along the lines of a passport.
I would think that is they are scrapping certain acceptable ID's then those that collected those types of ID's when they were acceptable by the law would be fine. I would think the law would just start on the date it was changed, just like the original 18-2257 did.

tony286 · 06-14-2004, 03:58 PM

vote vote vote I cant say it enough

llabtaem · 06-14-2004, 04:17 PM

Bump for the importance of this thread

notjoe · 06-14-2004, 04:18 PM

Shoulnt he be worrying about contempt of congress right about now?

BVF · 06-14-2004, 04:31 PM

Who cares? Who would take a college ID as legitimate ID...I want to AT LEAST see some kind of hologram on a Government Issued ID...

The Truth Hurts · 06-14-2004, 04:34 PM

how is that article or anything mentioned in it a bad thing?

crockett · 06-14-2004, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
how is that article or anything mentioned in it a bad thing?

I don't see anything wrong in it either. From the looks of it they are planning to do audits on content produces to check to see if they are up to par. Looks like more of a hassle but far from the sky is falling. Hell probably won't change the way most legit producers work anyway.

notjoe · 06-14-2004, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF
Who cares? Who would take a college ID as legitimate ID...I want to AT LEAST see some kind of hologram on a Government Issued ID...

They want to have the ability to actually examine the original document not the scanned/picture of/copied or otherwise an unoriginal document.

That is just a little extreme IMHO

*edit*

"The proposed rule tightens the list of acceptable forms of identification, scrapping college IDs and selective service cards. It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate."

Read "It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate.". This cannot be done with replica documents...

tony286 · 06-14-2004, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett
I don't see anything wrong in it either. From the looks of it they are planning to do audits on content produces to check to see if they are up to par. Looks like more of a hassle but far from the sky is falling. Hell probably won't change the way most legit producers work anyway.

Do you really think they are not going to out of their way to find something to fuck you on . lol

BlueQuartz · 06-14-2004, 04:55 PM

fuck I hate Bush

notjoe · 06-14-2004, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim

Um, what is this shit? You have to keep the ID now? That's not going to work, models are totally transient to the business and in life for the most part. How many content providers couldn't find half the girls that have worked for them if they had to?

Looks like this is the way it will be should things get passed...This would hinder production of content for everyone for a while until they built up a fairly big collection of such things as SIN cards and Driver licenses (god forbid a studio gets robbed and this info is stolen)...

The only way this could even possibly begin to work is if the documents were held by a single entity and true copies were produce and sworn by a J.P. and sent off to the person requesting them, but even that is one stupid idea

Dawgy · 06-14-2004, 05:00 PM

of course this wont apply to hollywood.

i just saw a calvin klein commercial for some perfume that has two naked little kids frolicking in the bathtub, full front nude, with barely suds covering much.

obviously not porn, but geez...

Major (Tom) · 06-14-2004, 05:07 PM

Its amazing how many girls I have to turn away that have cracker jack ID's.
Duke

cherrylula · 06-14-2004, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dawgy
of course this wont apply to hollywood.

i just saw a calvin klein commercial for some perfume that has two naked little kids frolicking in the bathtub, full front nude, with barely suds covering much.

obviously not porn, but geez...

They must be gearing up for their upcoming line of infant and toddler thong panties.

06-14-2004, 03:12 PM	#1
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	better get your 2257 shit in order http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...0 Pornography

06-14-2004, 03:16 PM	#2
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	Not sure how up to date this is lately, but if you have content from a provider on this list that is showing non-compliant, you had better start contacting them right away. Compliant Content Providers __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-14-2004, 03:19 PM	#4
cherrylula lol Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 15,969	Big brother wants more info on pornographers. Be sure to vote BUSH in 2004 so they can get their way! In fact, someone should launch "pornographers for bush," make t-shirts and donate the $ to his re-election campaign. Last edited by cherrylula; 06-14-2004 at 03:21 PM..

06-14-2004, 04:31 PM	#9
BVF Black Vagina Finder Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Midwest Posts: 13,975	Who cares? Who would take a college ID as legitimate ID...I want to AT LEAST see some kind of hologram on a Government Issued ID... __________________ Black Pussy Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!

06-14-2004, 05:00 PM	#16
Dawgy Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 5,856	of course this wont apply to hollywood. i just saw a calvin klein commercial for some perfume that has two naked little kids frolicking in the bathtub, full front nude, with barely suds covering much. obviously not porn, but geez... __________________ the revolution is coming. Last edited by Dawgy; 06-14-2004 at 05:02 PM..

06-14-2004, 03:16 PM	#3
Kimmykim bitchslapping zebras!!!!! Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: In a shack by the beach Posts: 16,015	"The proposed rule tightens the list of acceptable forms of identification, scrapping college IDs and selective service cards. It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Um, what is this shit? You have to keep the ID now? That's not going to work, models are totally transient to the business and in life for the most part. How many content providers couldn't find half the girls that have worked for them if they had to?

06-14-2004, 03:58 PM	#6
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	vote vote vote I cant say it enough

06-14-2004, 04:17 PM	#7
llabtaem Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Florida Posts: 969	Bump for the importance of this thread

06-14-2004, 04:18 PM	#8
notjoe Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 5,599	Shoulnt he be worrying about contempt of congress right about now?

06-14-2004, 04:34 PM	#10
The Truth Hurts Zph7YXfjMhg Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: In Your Skull Posts: 15,350	how is that article or anything mentioned in it a bad thing?

06-14-2004, 04:55 PM	#14
BlueQuartz Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 1,971	fuck I hate Bush

06-14-2004, 05:07 PM	#17
Major (Tom) White Pride Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 30,977	Its amazing how many girls I have to turn away that have cracker jack ID's. Duke __________________ WHITE LIVES MATTER