GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   better get your 2257 shit in order (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=312487)

tony286 06-14-2004 03:12 PM

better get your 2257 shit in order
 
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...0 Pornography

StuartD 06-14-2004 03:16 PM

Not sure how up to date this is lately, but if you have content from a provider on this list that is showing non-compliant, you had better start contacting them right away.

Compliant Content Providers

Kimmykim 06-14-2004 03:16 PM

"The proposed rule tightens the list of acceptable forms of identification, scrapping college IDs and selective service cards. It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Um, what is this shit? You have to keep the ID now? That's not going to work, models are totally transient to the business and in life for the most part. How many content providers couldn't find half the girls that have worked for them if they had to?

cherrylula 06-14-2004 03:19 PM

Big brother wants more info on pornographers.

Be sure to vote BUSH in 2004 so they can get their way!

In fact, someone should launch "pornographers for bush," make t-shirts and donate the $ to his re-election campaign.

freeadultcontent 06-14-2004 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
"The proposed rule tightens the list of acceptable forms of identification, scrapping college IDs and selective service cards. It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Um, what is this shit? You have to keep the ID now? That's not going to work, models are totally transient to the business and in life for the most part. How many content providers couldn't find half the girls that have worked for them if they had to?

Kimmykin you lost me. We have always had to keep a copy of the ID. Not sure about most shooters, but we have always insisted on two forms of Government ID, ussually a license or state issued ID card and something along the lines of a passport.
I would think that is they are scrapping certain acceptable ID's then those that collected those types of ID's when they were acceptable by the law would be fine. I would think the law would just start on the date it was changed, just like the original 18-2257 did.

tony286 06-14-2004 03:58 PM

vote vote vote I cant say it enough

llabtaem 06-14-2004 04:17 PM

Bump for the importance of this thread

notjoe 06-14-2004 04:18 PM

Shoulnt he be worrying about contempt of congress right about now? :thumbsup

BVF 06-14-2004 04:31 PM

Who cares? Who would take a college ID as legitimate ID...I want to AT LEAST see some kind of hologram on a Government Issued ID...

The Truth Hurts 06-14-2004 04:34 PM

how is that article or anything mentioned in it a bad thing?

crockett 06-14-2004 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
how is that article or anything mentioned in it a bad thing?
I don't see anything wrong in it either. From the looks of it they are planning to do audits on content produces to check to see if they are up to par. Looks like more of a hassle but far from the sky is falling. Hell probably won't change the way most legit producers work anyway.

notjoe 06-14-2004 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF
Who cares? Who would take a college ID as legitimate ID...I want to AT LEAST see some kind of hologram on a Government Issued ID...
They want to have the ability to actually examine the original document not the scanned/picture of/copied or otherwise an unoriginal document.

That is just a little extreme IMHO


*edit*

"The proposed rule tightens the list of acceptable forms of identification, scrapping college IDs and selective service cards. It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate."

Read "It also requires that forms of identification be accessible to government agencies to ensure they are legitimate.". This cannot be done with replica documents...

tony286 06-14-2004 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett
I don't see anything wrong in it either. From the looks of it they are planning to do audits on content produces to check to see if they are up to par. Looks like more of a hassle but far from the sky is falling. Hell probably won't change the way most legit producers work anyway.
Do you really think they are not going to out of their way to find something to fuck you on . lol

BlueQuartz 06-14-2004 04:55 PM

fuck I hate Bush

notjoe 06-14-2004 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim

Um, what is this shit? You have to keep the ID now? That's not going to work, models are totally transient to the business and in life for the most part. How many content providers couldn't find half the girls that have worked for them if they had to?

Looks like this is the way it will be should things get passed...This would hinder production of content for everyone for a while until they built up a fairly big collection of such things as SIN cards and Driver licenses (god forbid a studio gets robbed and this info is stolen)...

The only way this could even possibly begin to work is if the documents were held by a single entity and true copies were produce and sworn by a J.P. and sent off to the person requesting them, but even that is one stupid idea :thumbsup

Dawgy 06-14-2004 05:00 PM

of course this wont apply to hollywood.

i just saw a calvin klein commercial for some perfume that has two naked little kids frolicking in the bathtub, full front nude, with barely suds covering much.

obviously not porn, but geez...

Major (Tom) 06-14-2004 05:07 PM

Its amazing how many girls I have to turn away that have cracker jack ID's.
Duke

cherrylula 06-14-2004 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dawgy
of course this wont apply to hollywood.

i just saw a calvin klein commercial for some perfume that has two naked little kids frolicking in the bathtub, full front nude, with barely suds covering much.

obviously not porn, but geez...

They must be gearing up for their upcoming line of infant and toddler thong panties.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123