TripleXCash - You might wanna look at this - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

Oracle Porn · 05-15-2004, 08:30 AM

100 little aprils

Reak · 05-15-2004, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
fix your brain

go to your gay homey and suck his cock

demented · 05-15-2004, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
Are you sure? I had a teen TGP a few years ago, and I got into a ton of shit on GFY, AWI and a few other boards where everyone were screaming I was a pedo. Well, everyone is a bit of an overstatement.. a few guys got on my ass.
I was having 100% legal galleries, and I even got the proof from the sponsor whose content I was using, as I wanted to be sure so I emailed them. I even posted the email conversation between myself and the sponsor, it didn't mean jackshit to the people flaming me. I could have impacted my rep, but I was all legal so I had no worries.. Still I was flamed for a week or so.

Nasty Jack was one stupid motherfucker...

Oracle Porn · 05-15-2004, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reak
go to your gay homey and suck his cock

he told me that you did it 5 min ago...so hes cool now...maybe later tonight.

Reak · 05-15-2004, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
he told me that you did it 5 min ago...so hes cool now...maybe later tonight.

he confused me with your daddy

Jakke PNG · 05-15-2004, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by demented
Nasty Jack was one stupid motherfucker...

I wonder how he's doing. He was so full of himself then, and said he'd be doing this long after I was gone.

chemicaleyes · 05-15-2004, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by va2k
Daymn with your attitude I don't see why anyone in their right freaking mind would use you! How freaking hard would it be to put a simple link up for webmasters to show proof of age!! God damn im glad I don't talk like this to my webmasters... un real

jimmyf · 05-15-2004, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
Are you sure? I had a teen TGP a few years ago, and I got into a ton of shit on GFY, AWI and a few other boards where everyone were screaming I was a pedo. Well, everyone is a bit of an overstatement.. a few guys got on my ass.
I was having 100% legal galleries, and I even got the proof from the sponsor whose content I was using, as I wanted to be sure so I emailed them. I even posted the email conversation between myself and the sponsor, it didn't mean jackshit to the people flaming me. I could have impacted my rep, but I was all legal so I had no worries.. Still I was flamed for a week or so.

I remember that, you got flamed big time.

Jaden · 05-15-2004, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Oh my god.. are you trying to say that you're making a decision about this based on a few guys? Completely ignoring the fact that it's TOTALLY NORMAL AND NATURAL for MALES of the human species to be attracted to young, healthy females? 16 may be a taboo in our society, but there are still many countries in europe where 16 year olds are already married and mothers and it's not abnormal in the least. And it's an even FURTHER reach to try to compare that to a site with an 18 year old girl who just happens to look youngish? You are COMPLETELY clueless. I have two daughters. I don't want them out screwing 40 year olds when their 16. But I sure as hell am not going to think some guy is sick if he looks at them, maybe even fantasizes about them. I guess reality though is something that people in our day and age are bound and determined to ignore.

We're still human, aren't we?

Ok anyways I'm done ranting tonight. Nitenite GFY :P

Ya...but as someone who has a teenage daughter myself I have to say that I used to be able to see the "its only natural point of view". But let me tell you how icky and creepy it actually feels to be out with your daughter and see some over the hill fuck seriously checking her out. I am 100% positive that once that happens you will change your mind about how natural it is.

stev0 · 05-15-2004, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kronic
Excellent post!!

Glad to see someone has a clue instead of screaming pedo. I crack up everytime I see someone post that.

I interviewed Joan Irvine from ASACP a couple of weeks ago and she said pretty much exactly that.

Being attracted to a 16 year old "Fully Developed" young lady does NOT make one a pedo. Being attracted to that same young lady BECAUSE she's 16, is questionable and creepy. Being attracted to an undeveloped 16 year old who looks like she's 12 IS a pedo.

Yeah, being a pedophile means you're attracted to pre-pubescent children. Although there's not many pre-pubsescent 16 year olds... Hell, these days it seems there isn't even many pre-pubescent 12 year olds! Maybe they're stuffing, or maybe it's growth hormones... But just walking past a Jr.High at lunch, it doesnt look like the same place I went.

69pornlinks · 05-15-2004, 09:12 AM

that chick look fucking 12 or younger, i see alot of people trying to convince themselves otherwise......

Alex From San Diego · 05-15-2004, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
I think you fail to realize how many middle aged 35-45 year old guys that ARE NOT pedophiles but have strong fantasies of young 15-16 year old girls are out there. They are catering to that fantasy with the braces, lollipops and teddy bears and bullshit. Forget the word pedo for 1 fucking second already, jesus christ people. It's real easy to see. Theres no way *** is promoting an underage girl. We all know that, but they are promoting sick thoughts of dads fantasy about his daughters best friend who looks like a freshman in high school and plays the part perfectly with all the props to go with. And yes FreeHugeMovie guy, your an asshat for talking to current and potential affiliates like you someone fucking special. Fuck Off prick

Any 35-45 y/o man having fantasies of a 15-16 y/o is a degenerate in my book....

kronic · 05-15-2004, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Alex From San Diego
Any 35-45 y/o man having fantasies of a 15-16 y/o is a degenerate in my book....

KNOWING she's 15 or 16, regardless of what she looks like, I agree.

Not knowing she's 15 or 16 and she looks like a woman, I disagree.

Christ, you can't tell the difference in half these kids today.

Rawz · 05-15-2004, 10:10 AM

Anyone making galleries should have a link or url to the 2257 from the sponsor site , that simple . If the sponsor site doesnt have a 2257 link then you shouldnt be promoting it .
http://www.littleapril.com/18usc.html
This isnt fucking brain surgery ......

Asthma · 05-15-2004, 10:15 AM

smart idea

lazzlo · 05-15-2004, 10:17 AM

She does look super young. Maybe its the braces. I believe of course she is legal, but shes just to damn young looking and the domian name don't help, for me at least.

Reak · 05-15-2004, 10:17 AM

so oraclepig when are you finally leaving GFY?

Webasic · 05-15-2004, 10:19 AM

hard to believe they don't keep up with stuff

Reak · 05-15-2004, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reak
so oraclepig when are you finally leaving GFY?

i cant wait !

demented · 05-15-2004, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
I wonder how he's doing. He was so full of himself then, and said he'd be doing this long after I was gone.

I asked in a thread a while back.. noone seems to know where his crazy ass is. Prolly in some AOL chatroom somewhere.

pornstar2pac · 05-15-2004, 10:24 AM

120

people are slowwww today

Reak · 05-15-2004, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reak
so oraclepig when are you finally leaving GFY?

I cant wait dawg, I cant wait

Veterans Day · 05-15-2004, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jaden
Ya...but as someone who has a teenage daughter myself I have to say that I used to be able to see the "its only natural point of view". But let me tell you how icky and creepy it actually feels to be out with your daughter and see some over the hill fuck seriously checking her out. I am 100% positive that once that happens you will change your mind about how natural it is.

Thank you

Veterans Day · 05-15-2004, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Alex From San Diego
Any 35-45 y/o man having fantasies of a 15-16 y/o is a degenerate in my book....

Thank you, LadyMischief feels its "natural"

Strife · 05-15-2004, 10:59 AM

doubt triplexcash would have an underage site...just because she looks young doesn't mean she is under 18

Veterans Day · 05-15-2004, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Strife
doubt triplexcash would have an underage site...just because she looks young doesn't mean she is under 18

NOONE EVER SAID SHE WAS, READ THE THREAD

ChrisExtreme · 05-15-2004, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RRACY
These guys produced a LEGAL site that looks exactly like child pornography. This girl looks 13 at the very most and looks young in every image I've seen. From the child like music to the pictures of young children on the wall, these idiots produced a site that looks illegal. They likely stumbled upon this girl and thought she'd be the next tawnee stone. They produce Rectal
Rooter and Milk My Cock. How do you go from that to producing sites of girls who like like little kids?

They should take this site down immediately, apologize to webmasters around the world for this cheeseball disaster and update their existing sites.

Dude, your the biggest hypocrite in this fucking thread! click through your own fucking sig and look at what your promoting a chick that's 19 (and really ugly), on a tour that's pink with flowers, she's dressed like she young, and read the stories they suggest she is still young and has the mentality of a kid. So the one that needs to be apologizing now is you, for opening your dumb ass mouth when you should have kept it shut. Your nothing but a hypocrite looking for some attention, your pathetic!

LadyMischief · 05-15-2004, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AMADude
Everyone on here KNOWS that they would have sex with 16 year old girls if it was legal AND they would make sites with them IF it was legal. Your rants are correct.

It's legal in Canada to have sex with a 16 year old. 14 year olds are legal if you aren't in a position of authority, or she's not a virgin.

LadyMischief · 05-15-2004, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RRACY
These guys produced a LEGAL site that looks exactly like child pornography. This girl looks 13 at the very most and looks young in every image I've seen. From the child like music to the pictures of young children on the wall, these idiots produced a site that looks illegal. They likely stumbled upon this girl and thought she'd be the next tawnee stone. They produce Rectal
Rooter and Milk My Cock. How do you go from that to producing sites of girls who like like little kids?

They should take this site down immediately, apologize to webmasters around the world for this cheeseball disaster and update their existing sites.

Do your self a favor and go look up PEDOPHILE in the dictionary, ok? PEDOS DO NOT LIKE DEVELOPED GIRLS. If they like kids, they want them LITTLE, UNDEVELOPED. Cripes, I think the girl looks 16.. I've seen 25 year olds that look 16.. should nobody take pictures of them because it might look like child pornography? Fuck, this isn't even a HARDCORE site. There are a TON of sites out there with not only young looking girls, but those same girls with cocks in their mouths and cum dripping down their chins, and you idiots are splitting hairs and throwing around bullshit that isn't even applicable. Unebelievable.

EddiePulp · 05-15-2004, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Do your self a favor and go look up PEDOPHILE in the dictionary, ok? PEDOS DO NOT LIKE DEVELOPED GIRLS. If they like kids, they want them LITTLE, UNDEVELOPED. Cripes, I think the girl looks 16.. I've seen 25 year olds that look 16.. should nobody take pictures of them because it might look like child pornography? Fuck, this isn't even a HARDCORE site. There are a TON of sites out there with not only young looking girls, but those same girls with cocks in their mouths and cum dripping down their chins, and you idiots are splitting hairs and throwing around bullshit that isn't even applicable. Unebelievable.

i 100% agree.. well said

69pornlinks · 05-15-2004, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Do your self a favor and go look up PEDOPHILE in the dictionary, ok? PEDOS DO NOT LIKE DEVELOPED GIRLS. If they like kids, they want them LITTLE, UNDEVELOPED. Cripes, I think the girl looks 16..

, are you serious? that chick look fucking 12. also who you qouted didn't say anything bout pedo......

Roald · 05-15-2004, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reak
I cant wait dawg, I cant wait

Are you a negro?

you seem to be obsessed with oracle, maybe the 2 of you should both leave

LadyMischief · 05-15-2004, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DrinkingHard
The owner of Easypic has the right to decide what he wants to list at his own site. It's as simple as that...

If he doesn't feel comfortable listing the gallery, then it's really his business. I am sure there are tons of other TGPs that will list this gallery.

DH

Isn't that just the truth though

Roald · 05-15-2004, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
It's legal in Canada to have sex with a 16 year old. 14 year olds are legal if you aren't in a position of authority, or she's not a virgin.

haha this one cracked me up, so when you can find a slutty 14 year old it is ok?

LadyMischief · 05-15-2004, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jaden
Ya...but as someone who has a teenage daughter myself I have to say that I used to be able to see the "its only natural point of view". But let me tell you how icky and creepy it actually feels to be out with your daughter and see some over the hill fuck seriously checking her out. I am 100% positive that once that happens you will change your mind about how natural it is.

I have two daughters. I get it :P

LadyMischief · 05-15-2004, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by QuaShe
haha this one cracked me up, so when you can find a slutty 14 year old it is ok?

AYeah I never understood it myself, but that's the law. :P

Ron2k1 · 05-15-2004, 11:46 AM

I wonder how many CP complainments triplexcash allready got because of their little april site, even though she's legal.

LadyMischief · 05-15-2004, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
Thank you, LadyMischief feels its "natural"

You are a dumb motherfucker. Apperently you have NO idea what part human instinct plays in sexual arousal. Do some research before you attempt to call me down. I stated nothing more than fact. Or does the word "anthropology" have no meaning to you?

psyko514 · 05-15-2004, 11:57 AM

did all the *** reps disappear from this thread?

FreeHugeMovies · 05-15-2004, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514
did all the *** reps disappear from this thread?

Yea, I just left and haven't posted anything in this thread worthy of a reply.

AbulletAway · 05-15-2004, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
31 with a daughter, thanks

Amazing.

Rictor · 05-15-2004, 12:06 PM

That chick doesn't look underage.

Reak · 05-15-2004, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by QuaShe
Are you a negro?

you seem to be obsessed with oracle, maybe the 2 of you should both leave

No i'm not

lol i hate that dude

Ross · 05-15-2004, 12:21 PM

Seems little April might be a bit too much bother. I reckon I'll stay clear of it for now.

RRACY · 05-15-2004, 02:58 PM

The only unbelievable thing is the lack of regular gfy posters that didn't condemn this site when it was launched two weeks ago on this board. There are certainly hundreds of people who feel the same way, but didn't post because they were afraid. That original thread"Is She Even Legal?" had very few negative comments?

Someone said something about splitting hairs? Defining pedo may be splitting hairs but my post was not. I believe she is legal, so if they were investigated they would be right with the law. But she looks 13 and they produced the site to make that reality come across. This site looks, sounds, and feels like child porn. She looks like a child and not old enough to pose nude.

There is not a grey area with anything said above. A question for adult webmasters: Is it okay for legitamate pornographers to produce legal websites of models who look underage and promote that reality indirectly to surfers? I think more than half of folks would say stay away from sites like little april.

How does a program that has (CFF) one of the most popular websites in the history of universe get to little april?

They clearly made a mistake and should focus on coming up with the next great reality site.

05-15-2004, 08:30 AM	#101
Oracle Porn Affiliate Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Icq: 94-399-723 Posts: 24,433	100 little aprils __________________

05-15-2004, 09:12 AM	#111
69pornlinks Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Heranus Posts: 5,560	that chick look fucking 12 or younger, i see alot of people trying to convince themselves otherwise...... __________________ It IS what it IS

05-15-2004, 10:10 AM	#114
Rawz Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: New Hampshire Posts: 288	Anyone making galleries should have a link or url to the 2257 from the sponsor site , that simple . If the sponsor site doesnt have a 2257 link then you shouldnt be promoting it . http://www.littleapril.com/18usc.html This isnt fucking brain surgery ...... __________________ Need a thumb mgp built ? Hit me up for pricing 110628430

05-15-2004, 10:15 AM	#115
Asthma Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 682	smart idea __________________ AdultMovieClub.com 4000+ Galleries \| RSS Feeds \| White Label \| Search Boxes \| Weekly Payouts You can have your own white labeled DVD download site with matching gallery templates and banners in just a few hours.

05-15-2004, 10:17 AM	#116
lazzlo Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Toronto Posts: 3,709	She does look super young. Maybe its the braces. I believe of course she is legal, but shes just to damn young looking and the domian name don't help, for me at least. __________________ Buy my ads \| Sign up now

05-15-2004, 10:17 AM	#117
Reak So Fucking Banned Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: 420Calendar.com Posts: 17,920	so oraclepig when are you finally leaving GFY?

05-15-2004, 10:19 AM	#118
Webasic Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 1,889	hard to believe they don't keep up with stuff

05-15-2004, 10:24 AM	#121
pornstar2pac Omaha Hi/Lo Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 17,380	120 people are slowwww today __________________ Trump haters gonna hate. that's all they can do

05-15-2004, 10:59 AM	#125
Strife Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Canada Posts: 4,534	doubt triplexcash would have an underage site...just because she looks young doesn't mean she is under 18 __________________ Buy & Sell Ads on The Most Sexy Advertising Network on the Planet

05-15-2004, 11:46 AM	#137
Ron2k1 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,573	I wonder how many CP complainments triplexcash allready got because of their little april site, even though she's legal.

05-15-2004, 11:57 AM	#139
psyko514 See sig. Join Epic Cash. Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec. ICQ: 214702014 Posts: 22,366	did all the *** reps disappear from this thread? __________________ Bad Girl Bucks - 50% Revshare through CCBill. Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more! Phoenix Forum Pics \| Webmaster Access Montreal pics email: psyko514(a)gmail.com \| icq: 214-702-014

05-15-2004, 12:06 PM	#142
Rictor Old Timer Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 12,208	That chick doesn't look underage.

05-15-2004, 12:21 PM	#144
Ross Ik ben een aap Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Traffic Force Towers, Canada! Posts: 18,874	Seems little April might be a bit too much bother. I reckon I'll stay clear of it for now.

05-15-2004, 02:58 PM	#145
RRACY Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 1,393	The only unbelievable thing is the lack of regular gfy posters that didn't condemn this site when it was launched two weeks ago on this board. There are certainly hundreds of people who feel the same way, but didn't post because they were afraid. That original thread"Is She Even Legal?" had very few negative comments? Someone said something about splitting hairs? Defining pedo may be splitting hairs but my post was not. I believe she is legal, so if they were investigated they would be right with the law. But she looks 13 and they produced the site to make that reality come across. This site looks, sounds, and feels like child porn. She looks like a child and not old enough to pose nude. There is not a grey area with anything said above. A question for adult webmasters: Is it okay for legitamate pornographers to produce legal websites of models who look underage and promote that reality indirectly to surfers? I think more than half of folks would say stay away from sites like little april. How does a program that has (CFF) one of the most popular websites in the history of universe get to little april? They clearly made a mistake and should focus on coming up with the next great reality site. __________________ Sig Free