![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,167
|
Congress and "Video Voyeurism"
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ress_camphones
The bill before Congress would make it illegal to videotape, photograph, film, broadcast or record a naked person or someone in underwear anyplace where a "reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy." The legislation also would make it illegal to sneak photos of a person's "private parts" when "their private parts would not be visible to the public, regardless of whether that person is in a public or private area." There goes porn taped in private places :-) |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,167
|
It gets better:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c108CDi7D8:: `(2) the term `female breast' means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; (So, any taping of the bottom of the breasts when they have an expectation of privacy is illegal. Including those short tank tops that expose the bottom part.) Idiots :-) |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |