I dont think France would take sides. I dont think most of the arab nations would be quick to jump into that now. Those arab countries need to be worried about Israel. They dont fuck around!

North Korea is got to be thinking WTF is the US going to do after iraq.


I dont think there will ever be a war like this. US has now proven that we will go somewhere and kick some dictators ass if we need to. The bottom line is that the strength of the US military is known by intelligent entities. Hell, even sadam knew he couldn't win.


The us certainly doesn't want a full scale war against china or japan or any large industrialized country, but neither do they.

What are you going to do? Throw rocks at the tanks and helicopters.

The most likely scenario for a World War is USA + Israel vs China + North Korea + eventually the rest of the world... EU, South Korea, etc. No matter who wins it would be devastating to everyone.

VOTE OUT THE CHICKENHAWKS!!!

People around the world are not getting the whole story on the election.

It's really not as close as most of the media would have you believe. John Kerry doesn't have a chance to be elected president. I would guess a true scientific poll would have it more like 70%-30% with Kerry dropping every week.


It's all about money

Right now the party that is not in power is doing and saying everything they can to make people believe it is close and no one likes G. Bush. They are using Kerry as a throw away candidate and using this time to attact the reblican party for benefit of future elections.

(Before you jump on this post, the rebuplicans would be doing the same thing if it was the other way around)

Thanks for proving my case!

Do you really think you're qualified to make such assumptions?

I do not see Russia in the list... :)

ahahahaha, this has got to be the biggest joke post I've seen in years. Yeah, George Bush more popular in real life than he is on CNN. :1orglaugh

The democrats are faking polls and using the "liberal media" to make it look like Bush is going a terrible job and people hate him. In reality, it's the other way around. lol, how could anyone be ignorant enough to believe that?

Thanks for making my weekend. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I think most of you just don't realize that the European military tech level is at the same level as the US.

If either attack the other they wouldn't stand a chance of invading.

As I stated earlier Europe has alot more combat trained troops then the US due to mandatory military service. And we are not talking some 3 month training, rather minimum 9 months up to 2 years. The US army has some problems keeping the numbers up on their force in Iraq, how do you think it would fair if it faced 2 million combat trained men with the same level of tech.

If nukes were involved there would be total annihilation, cause France and UK got alot of nukes, not as much as the US, but enough to blow up the world.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/edu_sch_lif_exp_tot

I think this is what would would win the war.. good luck fucking with north america, our resolve to destroy you would be second to none.

It's very important to look at the war experience of the nation. Though nowadays wars become shorter what has to do with tech progress.
Anyways it's strange that one finds it very hard to break Iraq or Serbia. There was no war in the military aspect. Thus...who knows...

Chinese fleet sarrived in Hong Kong

http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/uploads/hk.jpg
http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/uploads/314a.jpg
http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/uploads/324b.jpg

Not as bad as I though

CNN link

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/as...na.hk.navy.ap/

The US probably has enough firepower pointed at those ships right now to destroy them 50 times over.

Hmm no way US can't beat US trust me on that :winkwink:

?

Those are huge dim sum heater/containers. Talk about Door to Door service.


US Navy will DESTROY the chinese navy. No comparison.

Yes they do, but they don't have the technology we have! :Graucho

jDoG

FUCK THE WAR!

the US has to many military bases spread out over the entire world not to win

Obviously you didn`t watch the news. How many US soldiers have died because of bomb or other similar attacks?

If you ask me, and nobody has. The united states has made the world a much UN-SAFER place to live in.

Pain in the ass

I`m sure if you think hard enough you might be able to.

As for the country I come from.

The one that comes in after the USA has blown the crap out of a nation and feeds the people.

I wave the flag that many Americans proudly sew on their backpacks when they travel.

Pain in the ass

Back at ya man. Actually, the democrats right now are seriously considering backing another candidate. If they want to make a change, they better do it quick.

Polls can be scientific with various margins of error. We could take the same poll and get the opposite results. The less the margin of error, which means in most cases, the more people polled), the more acurate.

However, to make the news, it has to be news. When is the last time you turned on the 6 o'clock news and they said everyone is safe, no car wrecks no burgluries.

There could be 1 million safe car trips that day in that town, but the one that makes the news is the one that has the wreck...

See what I"m trying to say.

lets not consider the media slant right now....

Bush is the President, if a poll says that he is going to be relected, that is not news. (Thats the safe car trip)

But, if a poll says that Kerry is going to win, now thats news!

It was the same way when the democrats were in office. Works both ways.


I obviously cant argue with you cause you are laughing so hard, but do me a favor and save this post. I promise you the election will not be as close as they would have you believe.

sarcasm

\Sar"casm\, n. [F. sarcasme, L. sarcasmus, Gr. sarkasmo`s, from sarka`zein to tear flesh like dogs, to bite the lips in rage, to speak bitterly, to sneer, fr. sa`rx, sa`rkos, flesh.] A keen, reproachful expression; a satirical remark uttered with some degree of scorn or contempt; a taunt; a gibe; a cutting jest.

The sarcasms of those critics who imagine our art to be a matter of inspiration. --Sir J. Reynolds.

Syn: Satire; irony; ridicule; taunt; gibe.


Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, ? 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.


sarcasm

n : witty language used to convey insults or scorn; "he used sarcasm to upset his opponent"; "irony is wasted on the stupid" [syn: irony, satire, caustic remark]



And yes, extremely qualified.

That is fucking hilarious!

Sure, if you think you have that much insight.

I'll give you this. If Europe invaded the U.S they would be defeated. If the U.S invaded Europe they would be defeated. If the U.S used nukes.. China and Russia and the rest of Europe would use nukes and there would be no winner.

Yet another adolescent question from the idiot tribe...

Even the idea of this is too stupid - much like the stupidity of invading Iraq and thinking that "our version" of democracy can be imposed at gunpoint.

It does not matter one fuck how many battleships/tanks and all that scrap metal the US taxpayer kindly donated "to the nation's defences". Ya forget one thing in the adolescent behavior - you can't change people's opinions or beliefs and any action that is taken will rebound for decades to come at a cost you ain't seen yet.

Don't even think of the stupid prospect of engaging with any other nations armies - ya can't even manage one in Iraq alone - and there is no doubt we have not seen even the start of any "problems" there yet. There is a cost for that "blunder" - another legacy from the sponsor of violence in the Whitehouse who are little better than Al Queda - the US people will sadly, in the end, pay the price for infantile idiocy.

Behave like an adolescent nation and ya get treated like one.

Don't HATE.... CONGRATULATE

papichulo:

Hate??? Hell.. don't hate, but observe a lot! :winkwink:

When the little boys reach a state of puberty, I might even CONGRATULATE!!! :glugglug