If bush were to get re-elected.... - GoFuckYourself.com

AndrewKanuck · 04-27-2004, 05:13 AM

Which country would he invade next?

North Korea?
Canada?
Cuba?

Who's next on his father....ermmm....his, list?

fris · 04-27-2004, 05:14 AM

canada.

Goose · 04-27-2004, 05:15 AM

north corea? too dangerous, because of nuclear weapons...
perhaps Europe, they might become a fair antagonist...

slackologist · 04-27-2004, 05:17 AM

palestine / syria / iran are more likely than any of those.. and due to the terrorism that apparently exisits in and extends from those countries i'd find it hypocritical if the u.s did not atleast send in forces to assist these governments to 'clean up' the terrorist threats.

VeriSexy · 04-27-2004, 05:22 AM

Columbia

Goose · 04-27-2004, 05:23 AM

perhaps us government should realize, that there are things in disorder in this world, that need military attention too, or even more...just think of Congo or Sierra Leone in Africa...it's unimaginable what outrages and cruelties happen every day in these countries.

Illicit · 04-27-2004, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fris
canada.

Im with you, lets get the canadians

they got oil up there ?

Goose · 04-27-2004, 05:29 AM

no you'll find way more oil up in Alaska...that's why it was taken up as a state of america

Gemini · 04-27-2004, 05:32 AM

I honestly try NOT to think where he might try to 'clean up' next. We need to deal with the messes we already have going first.

VeriSexy · 04-27-2004, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Goose
perhaps us government should realize, that there are things in disorder in this world, that need military attention too, or even more...just think of Congo or Sierra Leone in Africa...it's unimaginable what outrages and cruelties happen every day in these countries.

Why would the government give a rats ass about them unless they had oil?

AndrewKanuck · 04-27-2004, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ajpiii
Im with you, lets get the canadians

they got oil up there ?

fris is a canuck

beergood · 04-27-2004, 05:35 AM

I think at the next election it should be on the ballet so he knows where to go in order to get the highest public opinion on his second term.

AndrewKanuck · 04-27-2004, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by beergood
I think at the next election it should be on the ballet so he knows where to go in order to get the highest public opinion on his second term.

Public opinion? As if that ever mattered - what do you think this is? A textbook democracy?

Living For Today · 04-27-2004, 05:41 AM

zimbabwe needs cleaning up something chronic.

oh wait......no oil there. that nation will continue to suffer.

beergood · 04-27-2004, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by egonetworks
Public opinion? As if that ever mattered - what do you think this is? A textbook democracy?

lol. Well we can all dream can't we?

Roger · 04-27-2004, 05:49 AM

I'd say Sudan or some other really weak country, some country weaker than Iraq that the US can handle. That'll be hard to find.

RicardoB · 04-27-2004, 05:50 AM

Iran because they will start messing in Iraque

hydro · 04-27-2004, 05:59 AM

bush will try to attack alaska, he's that hungry for oil

AndrewKanuck · 04-27-2004, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by hydro
bush will try to attack alaska, he's that hungry for oil

Too cold to fight a war there...

Giorgio_Xo · 04-27-2004, 07:31 AM

Just for the record. Father Bush was against invading Iraq this time around.

Syria is the most likely choice.

jackson · 04-27-2004, 07:33 AM

being the Fuhrer that he is probably Canada... wats that all aboot

slackologist · 04-27-2004, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
Just for the record. Father Bush was against invading Iraq this time around.

Syria is the most likely choice.

well,

it was dick cheney that pushed for it last time. ( as secretary of defence )
it was dick cheney that pushed for it this time. ( as vice president )

AndrewKanuck · 04-27-2004, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by slackologist
well,

it was dick cheney that pushed for it last time. ( as secretary of defence )
it was dick cheney that pushed for it this time. ( as vice president )

It still leaves Bush as a giant puppet.

jimmyf · 04-27-2004, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
Just for the record. Father Bush was against invading Iraq this time around.

Syria is the most likely choice.

I would say so.

election: Bush = shoe in

slackologist · 04-27-2004, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by egonetworks
It still leaves Bush as a giant puppet.

He wouldn't be there if he wasn't.

stev0 · 04-27-2004, 07:46 AM

haha, yeah right ... you think they have the money, manpower, or public support after that bullshit war in Iraq? If they did, it will be a rich country somewhere (with oil, or other natural resources).

xenophobic · 04-27-2004, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Goose
perhaps us government should realize, that there are things in disorder in this world, that need military attention too, or even more...just think of Congo or Sierra Leone in Africa...it's unimaginable what outrages and cruelties happen every day in these countries.

Call the league of Superhero's 1-800 UNITED NATIONS.

04-27-2004, 05:13 AM	#1
AndrewKanuck Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Cleveland & Atlanta Posts: 6,706	If bush were to get re-elected.... Which country would he invade next? North Korea? Canada? Cuba? Who's next on his father....ermmm....his, list? __________________

04-27-2004, 05:14 AM	#2
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,372	canada. __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

04-27-2004, 05:15 AM	#3
Goose Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: --------Europe------- Posts: 5,725	north corea? too dangerous, because of nuclear weapons... perhaps Europe, they might become a fair antagonist... __________________ ICQ: 52410619

04-27-2004, 05:17 AM	#4
slackologist Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 2,379	palestine / syria / iran are more likely than any of those.. and due to the terrorism that apparently exisits in and extends from those countries i'd find it hypocritical if the u.s did not atleast send in forces to assist these governments to 'clean up' the terrorist threats. Last edited by slackologist; 04-27-2004 at 05:18 AM..

04-27-2004, 05:22 AM	#5
VeriSexy Join The Royal Family Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 25,463	Columbia __________________ Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN! Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos. With TOP RATIO Sites like TeenStarsOnly.com - Earn $$ with our New Site & Bonus Payouts!! ATMovs.com \| iTeenVideo.com \| TeenSexMovs.com \| TeenSexMania.com

04-27-2004, 05:23 AM	#6
Goose Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: --------Europe------- Posts: 5,725	perhaps us government should realize, that there are things in disorder in this world, that need military attention too, or even more...just think of Congo or Sierra Leone in Africa...it's unimaginable what outrages and cruelties happen every day in these countries. __________________ ICQ: 52410619

04-27-2004, 05:29 AM	#8
Goose Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: --------Europe------- Posts: 5,725	no you'll find way more oil up in Alaska...that's why it was taken up as a state of america __________________ ICQ: 52410619

04-27-2004, 05:32 AM	#9
Gemini Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: o-HI-o Posts: 7,183	I honestly try NOT to think where he might try to 'clean up' next. We need to deal with the messes we already have going first. __________________ <center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center>

04-27-2004, 05:35 AM	#12
beergood Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: United States Posts: 2,918	I think at the next election it should be on the ballet so he knows where to go in order to get the highest public opinion on his second term.

04-27-2004, 05:41 AM	#14
Living For Today Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 3,970	zimbabwe needs cleaning up something chronic. oh wait......no oil there. that nation will continue to suffer.

04-27-2004, 05:49 AM	#16
Roger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: MetroCity Posts: 3,181	I'd say Sudan or some other really weak country, some country weaker than Iraq that the US can handle. That'll be hard to find.

04-27-2004, 05:50 AM	#17
RicardoB Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 2,576	Iran because they will start messing in Iraque __________________ Let Me Show Ya How I Really Feel Ricardo's Rants

04-27-2004, 05:59 AM	#18
hydro Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Dirty 3rd Posts: 4,216	bush will try to attack alaska, he's that hungry for oil

04-27-2004, 07:31 AM	#20
Giorgio_Xo Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 4,263	Just for the record. Father Bush was against invading Iraq this time around. Syria is the most likely choice. __________________ Make Levees, Not War

04-27-2004, 07:33 AM	#21
jackson Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,094	being the Fuhrer that he is probably Canada... wats that all aboot __________________ PromO ArS 4 ReAL TeenPicCentral.com icq#303419172

04-27-2004, 07:46 AM	#26
stev0 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Calgary, Alberta Posts: 6,801	haha, yeah right ... you think they have the money, manpower, or public support after that bullshit war in Iraq? If they did, it will be a rich country somewhere (with oil, or other natural resources).