GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   If bush were to get re-elected.... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=275581)

AndrewKanuck 04-27-2004 05:13 AM

If bush were to get re-elected....
 
Which country would he invade next?

North Korea?
Canada?
Cuba?

Who's next on his father....ermmm....his, list?

fris 04-27-2004 05:14 AM

canada.

Goose 04-27-2004 05:15 AM

north corea? too dangerous, because of nuclear weapons...
perhaps Europe, they might become a fair antagonist...

slackologist 04-27-2004 05:17 AM

palestine / syria / iran are more likely than any of those.. and due to the terrorism that apparently exisits in and extends from those countries i'd find it hypocritical if the u.s did not atleast send in forces to assist these governments to 'clean up' the terrorist threats.

VeriSexy 04-27-2004 05:22 AM

Columbia :thumbsup

Goose 04-27-2004 05:23 AM

perhaps us government should realize, that there are things in disorder in this world, that need military attention too, or even more...just think of Congo or Sierra Leone in Africa...it's unimaginable what outrages and cruelties happen every day in these countries.

Illicit 04-27-2004 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fris
canada.

Im with you, lets get the canadians :1orglaugh



they got oil up there ?

Goose 04-27-2004 05:29 AM

no you'll find way more oil up in Alaska...that's why it was taken up as a state of america :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY

Gemini 04-27-2004 05:32 AM

I honestly try NOT to think where he might try to 'clean up' next. We need to deal with the messes we already have going first. :(

VeriSexy 04-27-2004 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Goose
perhaps us government should realize, that there are things in disorder in this world, that need military attention too, or even more...just think of Congo or Sierra Leone in Africa...it's unimaginable what outrages and cruelties happen every day in these countries.
Why would the government give a rats ass about them unless they had oil?

AndrewKanuck 04-27-2004 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ajpiii
Im with you, lets get the canadians :1orglaugh



they got oil up there ?

fris is a canuck

beergood 04-27-2004 05:35 AM

I think at the next election it should be on the ballet so he knows where to go in order to get the highest public opinion on his second term.

AndrewKanuck 04-27-2004 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by beergood
I think at the next election it should be on the ballet so he knows where to go in order to get the highest public opinion on his second term.
Public opinion? As if that ever mattered - what do you think this is? A textbook democracy?

Living For Today 04-27-2004 05:41 AM

zimbabwe needs cleaning up something chronic.

oh wait......no oil there. that nation will continue to suffer.

beergood 04-27-2004 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by egonetworks
Public opinion? As if that ever mattered - what do you think this is? A textbook democracy?
lol. Well we can all dream can't we?

Roger 04-27-2004 05:49 AM

I'd say Sudan or some other really weak country, some country weaker than Iraq that the US can handle. That'll be hard to find.

RicardoB 04-27-2004 05:50 AM

Iran because they will start messing in Iraque

hydro 04-27-2004 05:59 AM

bush will try to attack alaska, he's that hungry for oil :2 cents:

AndrewKanuck 04-27-2004 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by hydro
bush will try to attack alaska, he's that hungry for oil :2 cents:
Too cold to fight a war there...

Giorgio_Xo 04-27-2004 07:31 AM

Just for the record. Father Bush was against invading Iraq this time around.

Syria is the most likely choice.

jackson 04-27-2004 07:33 AM

being the Fuhrer that he is probably Canada... wats that all aboot

http://images.ibsys.com/2004/0107/2747004.jpg

slackologist 04-27-2004 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
Just for the record. Father Bush was against invading Iraq this time around.

Syria is the most likely choice.

well,

it was dick cheney that pushed for it last time. ( as secretary of defence )
it was dick cheney that pushed for it this time. ( as vice president )

AndrewKanuck 04-27-2004 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by slackologist
well,

it was dick cheney that pushed for it last time. ( as secretary of defence )
it was dick cheney that pushed for it this time. ( as vice president )

It still leaves Bush as a giant puppet.

jimmyf 04-27-2004 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
Just for the record. Father Bush was against invading Iraq this time around.

Syria is the most likely choice.

I would say so.

election: Bush = shoe in

slackologist 04-27-2004 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by egonetworks
It still leaves Bush as a giant puppet.
He wouldn't be there if he wasn't.

stev0 04-27-2004 07:46 AM

haha, yeah right ... you think they have the money, manpower, or public support after that bullshit war in Iraq? If they did, it will be a rich country somewhere (with oil, or other natural resources).

xenophobic 04-27-2004 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Goose
perhaps us government should realize, that there are things in disorder in this world, that need military attention too, or even more...just think of Congo or Sierra Leone in Africa...it's unimaginable what outrages and cruelties happen every day in these countries.
Call the league of Superhero's 1-800 UNITED NATIONS.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123