GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   To Those That Oppose The War Effort (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=270482)

MikeHawk 04-17-2004 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by milhouse_dick
I agree with you 100%, but you have to also look at what the war in Iraq has really done. It has undermined the war on terror. Instead of eliminating Al-Qaeda, we let them get bigger, stronger, and more able. So will we see another terrorist attack? More than likely. And we have no one to blame but ourselves. Had Bush attacked Iraq say in another year or two and given all those resources to the war on terror, I think it would be a different story (in terms of the American public's support for our leadership and military roles). :2 cents:

Maybe maybe not...look at the entire picture...and it will all make sense...un stable Middle East...and the fall of Israel would be devastating.:helpme


Its a much bigger picture than it seems... I am sure of that...it always is...

Rich 04-17-2004 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks


ok asshat. I don't watch fox or listen to talk radio.

there, I proved you're a liar in the first two seconds of thinking about it.
:1orglaugh

riiiiight

piker 04-17-2004 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
US media crucifies Saddam for killing the same people we're killing now.
Either it's justifiable to kill them or it's not. That debate is complex.
But can we at least kill this hypocritical doublestandard?


LOL are you kidding, you really are a cam chick huh. The same amount of people we are killing now. Do some research the numbers are not even close to the same.

and for the other person who thought al queda is stronger then before we went to iraq? Are you crazy? Is that why they are offering truces or maybe its because they are so nice and just want to fight the Americans.

piker 04-17-2004 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
The US didn't object in when they let Saddam kill vast numbers of poor rebels after the US backed out of Iraq the first time. Now all of sudden he's primary objective number one, ten years and more later. I would support a war effort if I agreed with the REAL reasons behind it. But I haven't even been told the real reasons, so how can I support an administration that doesn't trust its own citizens enough to be honest with them?

blah.

nb: I have nothing but gratitude and respect for individuals who have chosen to lay their life on the line for their own country. This isn't about them.

No you just choose to believe there is more to the story. Iraq was a threat it had the capacity to make WMD if it didnt have them already plus it had the desire to use them against your family. You need more REAL reasons? I don't.

piker 04-17-2004 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webby
AbulletAwayGoneBad:



Why is anyone talking about John Kerry??? He is not the President of the US.

The "President of the US" has far more proven problems than some, as the propaganda goes, "Senator from Massachusetts".

It was Bush who has been allegedly "leading" the US - *anyone* or any animal can conduct themselves with more responsibility and honor than this thing. Shall I send my parrot along for the next presidental challenge, - he talks good and has "some" sense.

If you think any of this has to do with "politics" or political leanings - it hasn't. The time for any consideration to politics has passed - this current situation supercedes any of that.

It's more like a time for criminal prosecutions...

Like usual webby, just propaganda and unsupport biases you keep spitting out. Why don't you put down the Tom Clancy novel since it obviously has gone too far to your head.

Centurion 04-17-2004 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker


No you just choose to believe there is more to the story. Iraq was a threat it had the capacity to make WMD if it didnt have them already plus it had the desire to use them against your family. You need more REAL reasons? I don't.

Blah blah blah...I also believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and John A-s-h-c-r-o-f-t is our friend!


Good imagination there dude!

piker 04-17-2004 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger


Read about the new american century.

It's funny how you know so much. You must have a lot better intelligence then the rest of the world on who is a real threat and who isn't. You must double as a super spy huh? Why else would you go against what the people with the intelligence are telling you? Ohh right because they need to fight in iraq so bad they are willing to make things up. What is even more laughable is people believe that instead of looking at the argument without biases. Such as...

The U.N. thought Iraq was a threat. If it didn't why would there be 20 or so U.N. sanctions against Iraq. They just liked fucking with him? They had nothing better to do? What rational do you guys use to ignore that? I don't understand. Or how about this the only reason the U.N. didn't do anything sooner is France, Germany, and Russia were all on the take from Iraq. The Food for Oil program made alot more people rich then just Saddam. But, yes it's much easier to think our president the guy sworn to protect you is the liar and really the other guys want to protect you and our president wants to exploit you right?

Again, what rational?

madthumbs 04-17-2004 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan


Perhaps it's just that the rest of the world has a different view, a less brainwashed view, a more unbaised view.... a more accurate view.


I think that .. hmm .. maybe it's the "we're not american, we're not the strongest country on the face of this planet, we don't have a big X on our backs with hordes of terrorists etc waiting to whack us, we have nothing to gain from this because its not our buildings, people, etc in danger" view.

12clicks 04-19-2004 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bich


riiiiight

typical mindless comeback.

That's how you back up your so called "facts" as usual.
It's gotta suck being so unhappy and impotent.:1orglaugh

SS396chevelleSS 04-19-2004 06:36 AM

Bush felt it our worldly duty, not the public, as you can see by the prez bashing, he wanted it not us

jimmyf 04-19-2004 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MikeHawk



Maybe maybe not...look at the entire picture...and it will all make sense...un stable Middle East...and the fall of Israel would be devastating.:helpme


Its a much bigger picture than it seems... I am sure of that...it always is...

yep......:Graucho

theking 04-20-2004 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


You used to be " readable" ... Now you are a complete idiot....

Show me a " UN resolution" that prohibits me from kicking your ass to the nearest bar....

Brilliant.

theking 04-20-2004 03:13 AM

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by theking


Conversley...please show me the UN resolution instructing the United States not to invade Iraq...the proposal of same...or the proposal of a censure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


You used to be " readable" ... Now you are a complete idiot....

Show me a " UN resolution" that prohibits me from kicking your ass to the nearest bar....

Does not alter the facts in my post...now does it?

theking 04-20-2004 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


You used to be " readable" ... Now you are a complete idiot....

Show me a " UN resolution" that prohibits me from kicking your ass to the nearest bar....

By the way...though I have had my ass kicked...it takes a skilled...extraordinary man to do it and unfortunately for you...I am satisified that you do not meet either criteria.

Rich 04-20-2004 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks


typical mindless comeback.

That's how you back up your so called "facts" as usual.
It's gotta suck being so unhappy and impotent.:1orglaugh

lol, I've posted more facts in this thread and this one then your head has stored in it, it's not my fault you can't read more than 15 words at a time. Now you're saying I'm mindless because I don't believe you don't listed to talk radio? hahaha, 12dicks, every post by you is a "typical mindless comeback". :1orglaugh

Oh, and "bich" isn't a word.

Rich 04-20-2004 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Ok, you say you want intellectual rebuttals. I assume you're not serious, but here it goes. Please, read what I'm about to wr<!f>ite and think about what I'm saying instead of thinking about how you're going to come back to it to continue convincing yourself that you're right and I'm wrong. I promise to give your response the same.

On September 11th, Saudi Citizens trained and paid for by Osama Bin Laden killed 3000 people. After the first plane hit, Bush went into a children's classroom to read a book. After they told him the 2nd plane hit, he sat their with a smile on his face, and read the story. He could have been scrambling planes, or at least been somewhere where he could have done that if need, seeing as he's the ONLY MAN IN AMERICA who is authorized to give the command to shoot down American civilians. Anyone who has worked in an air traffic control tower or been in the air force knows the other 3 planes should have been shot down. When everyone was banned from flying after 9/11, he rounded up all the Bin Laden relatives and Saudi Royals and flew them out of the country, even though the FBI wanted to question them. Turns out Bush has been doing business with them for years. Now, I understand that most republicans are not capable of admitting anything negative about Bush, but these are all facts that the administration does not deny. These are facts everyone should know, and any one of them should be an impeachable offense, but the media would rather talk about gay marriage and other distraction issues. Certainly Republicans will retort with mindless rambling about the Saudi's being good, Osama being the only bad apple in the family, etc. The truth is as recently as last year BOTH were found funding terrorism though a Washington based charity. The terrorist training camps continue to flourish, yet Bush has never mentioned them, and actually pulled troops out of the country.

Now, assuming you haven't yet switched into right wing defense mode and started writing something about a tin foil hat or my post being to long, you'll be asking yourself, why the fuck would they let 9/11 happen and then not catch the killers? Well, for the answer to this I'll refer you to the neo conservative report entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses". If you don't know, the Neo Conservatives are a group of people who believe that America should control the entire world, and to do whatever it takes to ensure that no other nation becomes a competing super power. In the Reagan and Bush administrations, they were considered hardliners, they were there with their views but no one planned on following them, people had the common sense to realize that their goals were unattainable and pointless. Then comes Bush and his Vice President, king of the neo cons mr. Dick Cheney. Once they get in power, they fill other key positions with prominent neo cons, including Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Richard Perle. They have policies about nearly every foreign policy issue, which always follow the same line of America controlling every nation's economy and natural resources.

You can read all about them on their own website http://www.newamericancentury.org,,,/ (remove 3 commas from url). I suggest starting in "Publications and Reports" - "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century". I'm sorry, but if you're going to vote for Bush, or push your views on the war, you really don't have enough information without having read at least this one report.

Among many other things they talk all about Iraq, how whatever nation gets their oil could become a super power. It also talks about fighting multiple simultaneous "theater wars" to prove American dominance. Notice George Bush referred to Iraq as a "theater in the war on terror" during his speech. The report also talks about creating the ballistic missile defense program, creating new and more powerful nukes, both things Bush has started. They're trying to start another cold war, which is why they don't want to get Bin Laden or any real threats to America.

In this report, they realize that it will take decades to convince the American people to buy this imperialism, unless of corse, they had September 11th to exploit.

"Further, the process of transformation even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor".

This administration did nothing to stop the WTC attacks, and have since exploited the sympathy and fear of the American people so they don't question their hardline agenda. They didn't tell you before they went into Iraq that it was to help the Iraqi people or provide stability in the middle east or whatever shit they're saying now, no, they say Iraq was responsible for 9/11, and that Iraq has WMD. If you think Bush and Cheney care about middle east democracy, tell me what dictator is ruling Iraq 5 years from now.

Their plan is to have never ending war and poverty. Their plan is to start the draft in June 2005. Their plan is to use fear and religion as tools to exploit the goodness of the American people, so they can fulfill their insane plot and give huge no bid war contracts to themselves and their friends.

Please stop allowing Fox and other news stations to summarize the news for you. Do a little reading a research for yourself. When TV tells you about something that you find interesting, something that will be affecting your opinions, go online and read the full story. You're comparing this war to WWII, which is laughable to most rational thinking people. The comparisons end at the # of people killed on US soil. Unfortunately because of Bush's lack of doing anything to fight the real terrorists, more likely than not there will be another tragic event in the US, which Cheney will then use to go into Iran, Syria, or one of the other countries on his hit list. Everything I've said in this post comes directly from the mouths of Dick Cheney and the neo cons, or from the Sept 11 hearings. The full hearings, not the 8 minute clips they show on TV.

Now, logically, looking at all this should raise an eyebrow. The truth is, we're going to have people like 12clicks and netrodent in this thread with half ass responses that Fox and talk radio have trained them to say when they here something that proves them wrong. "You're lying", "You're a moron", and "it was all Clinton's fault" are three that I'm predicting. They argue because they don't believe anything besides the official whitehouse story... to look at reality would be to admit they were wrong. I understand not wanting to admit mistakes, I understand years if not decades of believing one thing, I understand pressure to not disappoint parents, I understand all the reasons people make up excuses not to even try to look for the truth. It's a lot nicer to live in a world where you're always right, always doing the right thing, and always safe. Too bad that isn't reality.

You're being told that to be a conservative is to support Bush and the war machine, but that's simply not true. You're being told that to question it is to be unpatriotic and means you don't support the troops, that couldn't be further from the truth. Anyone who looks at the situation without bias can easily see what's going on. Why continue to believe and support an administration that has been proven to have lied to you over and over again?

12clicks, if you could read with any kind of understanding you'd have a hard time arguing anything I've said above. I know you think one liners about it being to long and a couple smilie faces will make you look smart, but it won't. Time to disappoint mommy and daddy and admit you've been supporting someone who's doing more harm than good.

ColBigBalls 04-20-2004 01:35 PM

OK #1 media is a huge influance now to the public but 2
Dont compaire the"Occupation" of Iraq to "WorldWar2"


These are 2 totally diffrent conflicts in ever sence of the word.
Bush never had to start a war in iraq.

"he is a threat to fredom as long as he holds WOMD'

WHEN IN THE FLYING FUCK DID EVERYONE FORGET THAT HE LIED ABOUT WHY HE WENT TO IRAQ.

Im not saying husain shouldent have been taken out of power. He was a madman.. fine. Id just like to hear.. JUST ONCE.. bush tell the ruth to his people and the rest of the world.

when did the war on terror loose its focus of going after terrorist organizations to going after a countrie that has so many sanctions its hardly a threat to itself in a world scheme.:2 cents:

rickholio 04-20-2004 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Oh, and "bich" isn't a word.
Sure it is. It's latin for 'generosity'. :thumbsup

Mmmmkay?

slackologist 04-20-2004 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ColBigBalls


WHEN IN THE FLYING FUCK DID EVERYONE FORGET THAT HE LIED ABOUT WHY HE WENT TO IRAQ.

Cheney was the one that pushed it along so quickly, cheney was the first to come out and say " Iraq has WMD". Bush a week before that had said "Iraq desires WMD" then a few days later bush says " a lot of people understand Iraq has WMD".

Now you're either with them or against them in TWOT / TWAT / whatever and Iraq is going to be batter place once America has killed off the rest of the terrorists.. er.. freedom fighters.

Joe Citizen 04-21-2004 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
Simple statements from simple fucks like yourself are only worthy of half ass responses.

After all, you are the master of half-assed responses. :1orglaugh

Rich 04-21-2004 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rickholio


Sure it is. It's latin for 'generosity'. :thumbsup

good call

Thanks 12clicks :glugglug

Centurion 04-21-2004 12:49 PM

100 reasons to oppose the war!

AMADude 04-21-2004 12:49 PM

100 War discussions.

AMADude 04-21-2004 12:50 PM

100 late posts

iwantchixx 04-21-2004 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
US media crucifies Saddam for killing the same people we're killing now.
Either it's justifiable to kill them or it's not. That debate is complex.
But can we at least kill this hypocritical doublestandard?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123