Should AVN have released the info on the HIV positive performer ??? - GoFuckYourself.com

JFK · 04-13-2004, 03:28 PM

or NOT ?? Think about it for a minute before you answer. Some lifes could be saved by the public knowledge getting out fast enough. I feel they have done the responsible thing

Fletch XXX · 04-13-2004, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JFK
I feel they have done the responsible thing

fortunately, what you and the board FEEL doesnt matter, me included

heheh

most people here never even heard of the guy

JFK · 04-13-2004, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX

fortunately, what you and the board FEEL doesnt matter, me included

heheh

most people here never even heard of the guy

Fletch, they will have now

Fletch XXX · 04-13-2004, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JFK

Fletch, they will have now

what the talent go through means nothing to me.

i dont feel sorry for anyone who plays with snakes and cries when they get bit,.

DR_PHIL · 04-13-2004, 03:36 PM

well obviously someone released it before avn published it so why not publish it? If they didnt hear it from there, woulda been elsewhere

MetaMan · 04-13-2004, 03:37 PM

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=268823

chAos · 04-13-2004, 03:37 PM

JFK - if they did not relaease at least a quarantine list then they would not be responsible to the rest of the performers in the industry ... it so happens that i know 2 of the people and it is a ripple effect in suck a small industry ... and it really is a good thing that they let other performers know what is going on with that .. as well as the performers agree to let the information released if there is an issue when they go in and get a test ..

Fletch XXX · 04-13-2004, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DR_PHIL
well obviously someone released it before avn published it so why not publish it? If they didnt hear it from there, woulda been elsewhere

http://aim-med.org/bio.html

as pointed out already, once you sign this crap, in the event of an outbreak your name will be rleased along with who you work with or whatever...

Rictor · 04-13-2004, 03:38 PM

He's a celebrity (minor) so it's news. If Tom Hanks had aids it would be on every magazine cover and on every channel.

Doctor Dre · 04-13-2004, 03:39 PM

Definitly without any doubt ... AIM are doing a good job too

AMADude · 04-13-2004, 03:44 PM

Absolutely, yes they should have.

justsexxx · 04-13-2004, 04:03 PM

I think it's a good thing. I mean those other performers can be tested now. And maybe they fucked some others etc etc.

But it's still a lil scary

Andre

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 04-13-2004, 04:08 PM

I think its a good thing.

I made a few calls today to make sure things were kool with some friends...

JFK · 04-13-2004, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
I think its a good thing.

I made a few calls today to make sure things were kool with some friends...

Good , hope your friends were OK

stephanie m. · 04-13-2004, 04:40 PM

Kimmykim · 04-13-2004, 04:42 PM

If the performers agree to having their names released when they work with AIM, then I can't find a single thing wrong with what's going on.

Halcyon · 04-13-2004, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rictor
He' If Tom Hanks had aids it would be on every magazine cover and on every channel.

Yeah, that was a sad movie. He and Antonio made such a cute couple.

MichaelP · 04-13-2004, 05:19 PM

Yes, of course they should have...

When everyone health is at risk, this is an info that must get out ASAP

Mutt · 04-13-2004, 05:58 PM

they have to make it public and get the word out, it's not the most organized biz in the world in the first place, shoots could have been scheduled for today with any of those girls, try calling a porn girl - very hard to reach them. Going public is necessary and that's why there is the waiver at AIM about it.

this is a really shitty situation - hopefully none of these 6 girls tests positive but if they do, then you have all the people they worked with after their encounter with Darren James, then all the people who worked with those peope - not to mention non-industry sex - this could be a small contained outbreak or .....

and you know that Ashcr0ft and his war on porn is going to use this to further demonize the porn industry.

our only shoot today had to be cancelled and i hear pretty much all shoots were today - tomorrow i dunno.

emmanuelle · 04-13-2004, 06:29 PM

Essentially by working with AIM, a performer is counting on them to vouch for their negative status. No one can expect AIM not to retract that 'vouch' when the status changes.

They can't have one way & not the other, particularly when people's lives & livlihoods are at stake.

RevSand · 04-13-2004, 06:51 PM

AIM and AVN did the totally right thing... Imagine what could happen if they did not release the info.. It sucks if you are the performer singled out but that is the risk going in. Every0ne else in the industry needs to get the information as soon as they can. As stated previously this is not the most organized industry there is anyway and there are ALOT of people doing it on a large and very small scale.

JFK · 04-13-2004, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mutt
they have to make it public and get the word out, it's not the most organized biz in the world in the first place, shoots could have been scheduled for today with any of those girls, try calling a porn girl - very hard to reach them. Going public is necessary and that's why there is the waiver at AIM about it.

this is a really shitty situation - hopefully none of these 6 girls tests positive but if they do, then you have all the people they worked with after their encounter with Darren James, then all the people who worked with those peope - not to mention non-industry sex - this could be a small contained outbreak or .....

and you know that Ashcr0ft and his war on porn is going to use this to further demonize the porn industry.

our only shoot today had to be cancelled and i hear pretty much all shoots were today - tomorrow i dunno.

Better to be safe then sorry, you did the right thing

04-13-2004, 03:28 PM	#1
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,374	Should AVN have released the info on the HIV positive performer ??? or NOT ?? Think about it for a minute before you answer. Some lifes could be saved by the public knowledge getting out fast enough. I feel they have done the responsible thing __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

04-13-2004, 03:37 PM	#7
chAos Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: hell Posts: 1,348	JFK - if they did not relaease at least a quarantine list then they would not be responsible to the rest of the performers in the industry ... it so happens that i know 2 of the people and it is a ripple effect in suck a small industry ... and it really is a good thing that they let other performers know what is going on with that .. as well as the performers agree to let the information released if there is an issue when they go in and get a test .. __________________ chAos Email Solutions - Traffic - Domains email: [email protected] skype: marketingguruchaos icq: 101955210

04-13-2004, 03:44 PM	#11
AMADude Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 3,875	Absolutely, yes they should have. __________________ No sig, just here to fuck around.

04-13-2004, 04:03 PM	#12
justsexxx Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 13,723	I think it's a good thing. I mean those other performers can be tested now. And maybe they fucked some others etc etc. But it's still a lil scary Andre __________________ Questions? ICQ: 125184542

04-13-2004, 04:08 PM	#13
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	I think its a good thing. I made a few calls today to make sure things were kool with some friends... __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

04-13-2004, 03:36 PM	#5
DR_PHIL Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Never visits the same thread twice Posts: 4,099	well obviously someone released it before avn published it so why not publish it? If they didnt hear it from there, woulda been elsewhere

04-13-2004, 03:37 PM	#6
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=268823

04-13-2004, 03:38 PM	#9
Rictor Old Timer Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 12,208	He's a celebrity (minor) so it's news. If Tom Hanks had aids it would be on every magazine cover and on every channel.

04-13-2004, 04:40 PM	#15
stephanie m. Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: cancun~~~~~~~~~ ICQ 292 580 143 Posts: 2,484	yes __________________ One of Six new Reality Sites in RealityCash - Coming soon.

04-13-2004, 04:42 PM	#16
Kimmykim bitchslapping zebras!!!!! Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: In a shack by the beach Posts: 16,015	If the performers agree to having their names released when they work with AIM, then I can't find a single thing wrong with what's going on.

04-13-2004, 05:19 PM	#18
MichaelP Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: QWEBEC Corporate Office Posts: 7,124	Yes, of course they should have... When everyone health is at risk, this is an info that must get out ASAP

04-13-2004, 05:58 PM	#19
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	they have to make it public and get the word out, it's not the most organized biz in the world in the first place, shoots could have been scheduled for today with any of those girls, try calling a porn girl - very hard to reach them. Going public is necessary and that's why there is the waiver at AIM about it. this is a really shitty situation - hopefully none of these 6 girls tests positive but if they do, then you have all the people they worked with after their encounter with Darren James, then all the people who worked with those peope - not to mention non-industry sex - this could be a small contained outbreak or ..... and you know that Ashcr0ft and his war on porn is going to use this to further demonize the porn industry. our only shoot today had to be cancelled and i hear pretty much all shoots were today - tomorrow i dunno. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

04-13-2004, 06:29 PM	#20
emmanuelle Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Oh Canada! Posts: 3,662	Essentially by working with AIM, a performer is counting on them to vouch for their negative status. No one can expect AIM not to retract that 'vouch' when the status changes. They can't have one way & not the other, particularly when people's lives & livlihoods are at stake.

04-13-2004, 06:51 PM	#21
RevSand Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Porn Valley Posts: 8,151	AIM and AVN did the totally right thing... Imagine what could happen if they did not release the info.. It sucks if you are the performer singled out but that is the risk going in. Every0ne else in the industry needs to get the information as soon as they can. As stated previously this is not the most organized industry there is anyway and there are ALOT of people doing it on a large and very small scale. __________________ BadBitchesGoodWeed Hire me for all your video shooting needs!! Skype = RevSandx