FBI Hikes Gambino Site Take at $750 Million - GoFuckYourself.com

DVTimes · 04-13-2004, 06:01 AM

FBI Hikes Gambino Site Take at $750 Million

OVERLAND PARK, Kansas ? Federal authorities now believe that the Gambino crime family?s online adult business generated $750 million in revenue, XBiz has learned.
XBiz reported last month on new federal indictments alleging that Lexitrans and other shell companies in Overland Park, Kansas, were used to help run adult Internet sites and 900 numbers that advertised free trials but charged customers anyway.

Thousands of adult surfers who thought they were taking a free peek at the sexually explicit material actually were charged $59.99 a month, FBI spokesman James Margolin told XBiz.

?Based on our belief, this is the largest consumer fraud in U.S. history," Margolin said. ?The FBI is working with the Federal Trade Commission on the case, and we?re confident the figure will exceed $750 million ? the numbers are growing, not shrinking.?

The scheme originally was thought to have bilked customers out of $230 million when the FBI made the indictments Feb. 10.

Lexitrans Inc. was allegedly founded by members of the Gambino family, including Richard Martino, who partnered with Norman Chanes, producer of several low-budget Hollywood movies and an alleged associate of the Gambino organization, to create an informal joint venture with Crescent Publishing Group Inc.

Lexitrans moved from New York in 1996, after up-and-coming members of the Gambino crime began looking for a new home.

The company?s Overland Park offices contained 7,000 square feet of data center space, with redundant power and huge fiber-optic pipes. One source as saying that Lexitrans paid $50,000 a month for Internet access alone.

The adult websites Lexitrans ran were flourishing.

?Ridiculous amounts of traffic, ridiculous amounts of refunds,? a former employee said in court papers.

Before federal indictments started landing, Lexitrans attracted little attention.

Crescent owned adult magazines such as Playgirl and Live Young Girls, and the ideas was to create Internet sites for the magazines, according to court papers.

A source said that at one point the company was spending $100,000 a day for placement on search engines such as AltaVista. He also said that Lexitrans paid $50,000 a month for Internet access alone.

Lexitrans programmers, the source said, hatched the idea of inundating users with pop-up ads for related pornographic sites. With a fraction of people going to those sites and signing up for free tours, the idea worked.

Each of the shell companies was controlled by the Mafia and used to defraud consumers through Internet and telephone schemes, according to the indictment.

The Federal Trade Commission and the New York State Attorney General settled a lawsuit against Crescent in 2000. Crescent, according to the indictment, has been returning one of every three dollars of revenue the sites generated in 1999 as part of the settlement.

So far more than 450,000 claim forms have been mailed to potential claimants to those who were billed for the following sites: Playgirl.com, Playgirlde.com, Playgirldeutschland.com, Playgirldeutsch.com, Playgirlmag.com. Allwetsex.com, Bi-curioustv.com, Candygirlsmag.com, Chateudesade.com, Cheri.com, Cherimag.com, Cheritv.com, Climaxmag.com, Cock-tv.com, Cun-tv.com, Hotyounghunks.com, Fastlanesex.com, Fleshfest.com, Freeskinparty.com, Fukvision.com, Hawkmag.com, Highsociety.com, Highsocietymag.com, Highsocietydeutsch.com, Highsocietydeutschland.com, Highsocietytv.com, Lusthighway.com, Planetflesh.com, Schoolgirls4u.com, Sexundersurveillance.com, Sexcityintl.com, Sexonthestrip.com, Teenplaythings.com, Xxxposure.com and Ygal.com.

http://www.xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=2820

Brad Mitchell · 04-13-2004, 06:03 AM

Holy shit that's a rediculous amount of money. So I wonder if they had their own merchant accounts for all this? I would presume as much.

Brad

Triple 6 · 04-13-2004, 06:05 AM

that sux

mind · 04-13-2004, 06:05 AM

Well thats just great - not the kinda thing that improves the rep. of this biz...

Jedimaster · 04-13-2004, 06:08 AM

There are some good tips in that article.

SR · 04-13-2004, 06:10 AM

I don't believe much of that.
$100K a day on se traffic?
I know of people spending tons of money on se traffic but not even close to 100K a day.
$750M sounds too high as well.
At $50 a sale they'll need 15M sales/rebills.

jackson · 04-13-2004, 06:12 AM

never thought crime families would take the time to even start something of that sort. Considering the risk and the amounts of money they were dealing with.

Brad Mitchell · 04-13-2004, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SR
I don't believe much of that.
$100K a day on se traffic?
I know of people spending tons of money on se traffic but not even close to 100K a day.
$750M sounds too high as well.
At $50 a sale they'll need 15M sales/rebills.

I tend to agree... I mean, that much money floating around they'd have to be well known in the business. Are we supposed to believe they did this all on their own and never sent even exit traffic out or paid any of the content providers for lease plugins? The numbers just don't add up... of course I don't know how many years they were doing this.. but look at their numbers to the amount of business someone like IBILL did in total.

Perhaps they were also using the business to "launder" money so not all of the revenue wasn't genuinely from surfers?

Brad

Shoehorn! · 04-13-2004, 06:15 AM

scoreman · 04-13-2004, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SR
I don't believe much of that.
$100K a day on se traffic?
I know of people spending tons of money on se traffic but not even close to 100K a day.
$750M sounds too high as well.
At $50 a sale they'll need 15M sales/rebills.

Your missing an important point. The perps that were spending the money were generating it through massive fraud. Your experiences are with folks trying to make a go at legitimate business. You cant apply real world analysis of retention, conversion and the economics of getting a true ROI with seach engine spending because they were not following legal boundaries. When you are propped up by illegally charging cards two, three and four times each for $50-100 a pop, spending 100k a day in search engine listings was a small marketing price to pay to get leads on more sheep to slaughter.

scoreman · 04-13-2004, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SinEmpire

I tend to agree... I mean, that much money floating around they'd have to be well known in the business. Are we supposed to believe they did this all on their own and never sent even exit traffic out or paid any of the content providers for lease plugins? The numbers just don't add up... of course I don't know how many years they were doing this.. but look at their numbers to the amount of business someone like IBILL did in total.

Perhaps they were also using the business to "launder" money so not all of the revenue wasn't genuinely from surfers?

Brad

Brad, the same goes with content. Your thinking about a real business model where you have to have content to sustain a transaction. This was fraud, Crescent didnt have to put up high quality content because they planned on charging cards multiple times under many, many different billing descriptors. They didnt care about anything but getting more names and more credit card numbers.

LauraLee · 04-13-2004, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SinEmpire
Holy shit that's a rediculous amount of money. So I wonder if they had their own merchant accounts for all this? I would presume as much.

Brad

they did, the people running the processing were here in florida.

ControlThy · 04-13-2004, 07:35 AM

And people wonder why Visa and Mastercard have so many rules and policies.

llabtaem · 04-13-2004, 07:41 AM

If only they had been running a 60/40 affiliate program

jayeff · 04-13-2004, 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ControlThy
And people wonder why Visa and Mastercard have so many rules and policies.

And you have to wonder how many people in our business knew what was going on and kept quiet about it: despite the damage it would do to the industry.

I guess it's possible this operation was totally isolated, but whenever a scam (whether of customers or webmasters) is exposed, there always seems to be a crop of people popping up and claiming to have known about it.

I get more p*ssed at people who turn a blind eye to the cr*p that goes on, than at those who dish it out. Because if legitimate webmasters can't be bothered to protect the industry and each other, we might as well hang out a sign saying "shysters welcome".

kmanrox · 04-13-2004, 07:53 AM

that's peanuts

Joesho · 04-13-2004, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LauraLee

they did, the people running the processing were here in florida.

what impossible, there are no mobsters in florida!!!!

maxjohan · 04-13-2004, 07:56 AM

Something to do with Paris Hilton Scam?

ControlThy · 04-13-2004, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff

And you have to wonder how many people in our business knew what was going on and kept quiet about it: despite the damage it would do to the industry.

Lots of webmasters sold traffic to Crescent back then so I am sure enough people had an idea of what was going on.

Oh well the power of money.

steffie · 04-13-2004, 08:03 AM

Who would have thought the MOB fell that low and do PORN online

ROTFL

Ge Ge, who would have thought.. What's the world coming too..

PF PF

Trax · 04-13-2004, 08:03 AM

there go thousands of customers who will barely ever buy a porn membership again
(in case its really true)
those numbers look a little bit big to me....but... who knows)

web4x · 04-13-2004, 08:05 AM

Look who purchased their domains

http://www.playgirldeutschland.com/

DarkJedi · 04-13-2004, 08:07 AM

B-Eazy · 04-13-2004, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by web4x
Look who purchased their domains

http://www.playgirldeutschland.com/

Whats wrong with that?

DarkJedi · 04-13-2004, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trax
there go thousands of customers who will barely ever buy a porn membership again
(in case its really true)
those numbers look a little bit big to me....but... who knows)

don't worry, every day thousands more suckers discover the wonders of internet

Jer · 04-13-2004, 08:13 AM

A few domains sounds familiar. Did they buy clicks from that Serge Clicks program?

123Jason · 04-13-2004, 08:17 AM

I actually received a letter regarding the class action lawsuit against Trans Digital saying they wrongly charged my credit card 59.99. I had to sign a paper saying I agreed with that amount and send it back...still waiting for my 59.99

Phoenix · 04-13-2004, 08:26 AM

never heard of them before

Paul Markham · 04-13-2004, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff

And you have to wonder how many people in our business knew what was going on and kept quiet about it: despite the damage it would do to the industry.

I guess it's possible this operation was totally isolated, but whenever a scam (whether of customers or webmasters) is exposed, there always seems to be a crop of people popping up and claiming to have known about it.

I get more p*ssed at people who turn a blind eye to the cr*p that goes on, than at those who dish it out. Because if legitimate webmasters can't be bothered to protect the industry and each other, we might as well hang out a sign saying "shysters welcome".

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi

don't worry, every day thousands more suckers discover the wonders of internet

What a difference in attitude. One guy who says unless we clean up our act we will always be bottom opne to scammers, the other who newcomers are suckers. Wonder which view will prevail in the long term?

But the worse side of this is Visa. At what point did they say to themselves "There is something wrong with this account" Was it when the FBI were standing in there offices?

How come they did not just cancel the account, or were they just looking at the bottom line?

DarkJedi · 04-13-2004, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly

What a difference in attitude. One guy who says unless we clean up our act we will always be bottom opne to scammers, the other who newcomers are suckers. Wonder which view will prevail in the long term?

But the worse side of this is Visa. At what point did they say to themselves "There is something wrong with this account" Was it when the FBI were standing in there offices?

How come they did not just cancel the account, or were they just looking at the bottom line?

Nigga please.

You know damn well that 90% of affiliate programs fuck surfers over in some way (be it a shitty members area or free trials/cross-sales bullshit)

Brad Mitchell · 04-13-2004, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoreman

Brad, the same goes with content. Your thinking about a real business model where you have to have content to sustain a transaction. This was fraud, Crescent didnt have to put up high quality content because they planned on charging cards multiple times under many, many different billing descriptors. They didnt care about anything but getting more names and more credit card numbers.

You're right, I wasn't thinking outside the legal box. LOL

I wonder how many merchant accounts and shell companies they went through.

Brad

jayeff · 04-13-2004, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
You know damn well that 90% of affiliate programs fuck surfers over in some way (be it a shitty members area or free trials/cross-sales bullshit)

So let me put your two posts together and see if I have the logic right. Because there are new surfers every year, we can afford to keep "fucking surfers over in some way"?

Maybe I'm missing something and for sure some surfers will get bitten a few times before they learn the lesson. But doesn't that mean that instead of enjoying an ever increasing market, the best we can hope for is to be fighting over the same number of innocents each year?

Perhaps the picture isn't quite as black as that. But is there some major downside to the programs that don't undermine the market, which makes it worthwhile supporting the programs which do?

BVF · 04-13-2004, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by llabtaem
If only they had been running a 60/40 affiliate program

and do you think you would have gotten paid? wake up.

NetRodent · 04-13-2004, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoreman

Your missing an important point. The perps that were spending the money were generating it through massive fraud. Your experiences are with folks trying to make a go at legitimate business. You cant apply real world analysis of retention, conversion and the economics of getting a true ROI with seach engine spending because they were not following legal boundaries. When you are propped up by illegally charging cards two, three and four times each for $50-100 a pop, spending 100k a day in search engine listings was a small marketing price to pay to get leads on more sheep to slaughter.

This explains how AV was able to get away charging $50 CPM for banner ads.

WiredGuy · 04-13-2004, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by allanuk
A source said that at one point the company was spending $100,000 a day for placement on search engines such as AltaVista. He also said that Lexitrans paid $50,000 a month for Internet access alone.

And I thought I was a medium player in the PPC SE game. Although I still think this 100k per day is exaggerated.

WG

goBigtime · 04-13-2004, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by WiredGuy

And I thought I was a medium player in the PPC SE game. Although I still think this 100k per day is exaggerated.

WG

They probably were getting anything they wanted out of AltaVista for that $100k/day .

Could you imagine what you might be able to get these days over at google for such a commitment? 3 mil a month...

Fletch XXX · 04-13-2004, 10:21 AM

if any of you believe that figure you are dumb.

this is exxagerated as it ALWAYS is to make the public turn an eye and pay attention.

this is another smear campaign being launched against this industry.

to see it any other way is denial.

SR · 04-13-2004, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by scoreman

Your missing an important point. The perps that were spending the money were generating it through massive fraud. Your experiences are with folks trying to make a go at legitimate business. You cant apply real world analysis of retention, conversion and the economics of getting a true ROI with seach engine spending because they were not following legal boundaries. When you are propped up by illegally charging cards two, three and four times each for $50-100 a pop, spending 100k a day in search engine listings was a small marketing price to pay to get leads on more sheep to slaughter.

Sorry still don't believe these numbers

Not saying they didn't make that amount of money but not just with online porn.

WiredGuy · 04-13-2004, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by goBigtime
They probably were getting anything they wanted out of AltaVista for that $100k/day .

Could you imagine what you might be able to get these days over at google for such a commitment? 3 mil a month...

hehe, google would love you!
WG

sexsup · 04-13-2004, 11:04 AM

Mafia is everywhere

dig420 · 04-13-2004, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff

And you have to wonder how many people in our business knew what was going on and kept quiet about it: despite the damage it would do to the industry.

I guess it's possible this operation was totally isolated, but whenever a scam (whether of customers or webmasters) is exposed, there always seems to be a crop of people popping up and claiming to have known about it.

I get more p*ssed at people who turn a blind eye to the cr*p that goes on, than at those who dish it out. Because if legitimate webmasters can't be bothered to protect the industry and each other, we might as well hang out a sign saying "shysters welcome".

There are plenty of people who knew about it and kept their mouth shut for obvious reasons. Talking too much about certain people is bad for your health.

Some of the people involved with this are still very active in this business. Some of them run webmaster boards, for example. Damned if I'm naming anyhahahaha though

Dveron · 04-13-2004, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ControlThy

Lots of webmasters sold traffic to Crescent back then so I am sure enough people had an idea of what was going on.

Yeah much of it went via Serge and cotac.com

JamesK · 04-13-2004, 11:11 AM

dig420 · 04-13-2004, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by goBigtime

They probably were getting anything they wanted out of AltaVista for that $100k/day .

Could you imagine what you might be able to get these days over at google for such a commitment? 3 mil a month...

the more money we put into Google, the more we lost. If anyone has figured out how to make a good ROI with Adwords hit me up on ICQ and sell me your knowledge.

Fletch XXX · 04-13-2004, 11:12 AM

you people act like there isnt mafia in porn.

trust me.

socal is ran by crooked porn mafia.

Nismo · 04-13-2004, 11:24 AM

I wonder if snow was involved http://www.mafiabucks.com ? LOL

Basic_man · 04-13-2004, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi

Nigga please.

You know damn well that 90% of affiliate programs fuck surfers over in some way (be it a shitty members area or free trials/cross-sales bullshit)

Yeah, I fuckin' agree!!

And I will not name some of them...

cosis · 04-13-2004, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nismo
I wonder if snow was involved http://www.mafiabucks.com ? LOL

no this isn't a wannabe mafia

scoreman · 04-13-2004, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SR

Sorry still don't believe these numbers
Not saying they didn't make that amount of money but not just with online porn.

In all honesty, neither do I. The attorney in me just loves to get on the other side of an argument, even when the other side is tenuous at best. I do think that the Crescent scam was of epic proportions but the numbers being pushed by the Feds do indeed raise eyebrows.

The main reason I distrust numbers from law enforcement is their historical preference of inflating dollar amounts to give their busts more credibility. My favorite is when they take a drug bust (for example 100 kilos of coke) and they then give a dollar amount to the bust based on what that coke would sell for cut up 4 times and sold per gram on the street. When I use to work doing criminal defense we once had a case where a defendant had 4 pot plants in his trunk and the police originally charged him based on the weight of the plants including the dirt in the pail. It was ridiculous and the state attorney on the case plead the case down dramatically with very little prodding. Meanwhile the newspaper report had the police confiscating "55 lbs of marijuana" from our clients car . High-larious it was (except for the poor sap charged).

kimzar · 04-13-2004, 11:52 AM

i agree these numbers are probably being inflated for the reason of scaring off customers and bringing more attention to porn

04-13-2004, 06:01 AM	#1
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,547	FBI Hikes Gambino Site Take at $750 Million FBI Hikes Gambino Site Take at $750 Million OVERLAND PARK, Kansas ? Federal authorities now believe that the Gambino crime family?s online adult business generated $750 million in revenue, XBiz has learned. XBiz reported last month on new federal indictments alleging that Lexitrans and other shell companies in Overland Park, Kansas, were used to help run adult Internet sites and 900 numbers that advertised free trials but charged customers anyway. Thousands of adult surfers who thought they were taking a free peek at the sexually explicit material actually were charged $59.99 a month, FBI spokesman James Margolin told XBiz. ?Based on our belief, this is the largest consumer fraud in U.S. history," Margolin said. ?The FBI is working with the Federal Trade Commission on the case, and we?re confident the figure will exceed $750 million ? the numbers are growing, not shrinking.? The scheme originally was thought to have bilked customers out of $230 million when the FBI made the indictments Feb. 10. Lexitrans Inc. was allegedly founded by members of the Gambino family, including Richard Martino, who partnered with Norman Chanes, producer of several low-budget Hollywood movies and an alleged associate of the Gambino organization, to create an informal joint venture with Crescent Publishing Group Inc. Lexitrans moved from New York in 1996, after up-and-coming members of the Gambino crime began looking for a new home. The company?s Overland Park offices contained 7,000 square feet of data center space, with redundant power and huge fiber-optic pipes. One source as saying that Lexitrans paid $50,000 a month for Internet access alone. The adult websites Lexitrans ran were flourishing. ?Ridiculous amounts of traffic, ridiculous amounts of refunds,? a former employee said in court papers. Before federal indictments started landing, Lexitrans attracted little attention. Crescent owned adult magazines such as Playgirl and Live Young Girls, and the ideas was to create Internet sites for the magazines, according to court papers. A source said that at one point the company was spending $100,000 a day for placement on search engines such as AltaVista. He also said that Lexitrans paid $50,000 a month for Internet access alone. Lexitrans programmers, the source said, hatched the idea of inundating users with pop-up ads for related pornographic sites. With a fraction of people going to those sites and signing up for free tours, the idea worked. Each of the shell companies was controlled by the Mafia and used to defraud consumers through Internet and telephone schemes, according to the indictment. The Federal Trade Commission and the New York State Attorney General settled a lawsuit against Crescent in 2000. Crescent, according to the indictment, has been returning one of every three dollars of revenue the sites generated in 1999 as part of the settlement. So far more than 450,000 claim forms have been mailed to potential claimants to those who were billed for the following sites: Playgirl.com, Playgirlde.com, Playgirldeutschland.com, Playgirldeutsch.com, Playgirlmag.com. Allwetsex.com, Bi-curioustv.com, Candygirlsmag.com, Chateudesade.com, Cheri.com, Cherimag.com, Cheritv.com, Climaxmag.com, Cock-tv.com, Cun-tv.com, Hotyounghunks.com, Fastlanesex.com, Fleshfest.com, Freeskinparty.com, Fukvision.com, Hawkmag.com, Highsociety.com, Highsocietymag.com, Highsocietydeutsch.com, Highsocietydeutschland.com, Highsocietytv.com, Lusthighway.com, Planetflesh.com, Schoolgirls4u.com, Sexundersurveillance.com, Sexcityintl.com, Sexonthestrip.com, Teenplaythings.com, Xxxposure.com and Ygal.com. http://www.xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=2820 __________________ The Affiliate Program

04-13-2004, 06:03 AM	#2
Brad Mitchell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Southfield, MI Posts: 9,812	Holy shit that's a rediculous amount of money. So I wonder if they had their own merchant accounts for all this? I would presume as much. Brad __________________ President at MojoHost \| brad at mojohost dot com \| Skype MojoHostBrad 71 industry awards for hosting and professional excellence since 1999

04-13-2004, 06:05 AM	#3
Triple 6 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: isN'T everything Posts: 5,394	that sux __________________ SIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.

04-13-2004, 06:05 AM	#4
mind Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Aarhus, Denmark Posts: 1,199	Well thats just great - not the kinda thing that improves the rep. of this biz... __________________ MiND \| ProDesignLab.com

04-13-2004, 06:12 AM	#7
jackson Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,094	never thought crime families would take the time to even start something of that sort. Considering the risk and the amounts of money they were dealing with. __________________ PromO ArS 4 ReAL TeenPicCentral.com icq#303419172

04-13-2004, 06:08 AM	#5
Jedimaster Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,120	There are some good tips in that article.

04-13-2004, 06:10 AM	#6
SR Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 2,239	I don't believe much of that. $100K a day on se traffic? I know of people spending tons of money on se traffic but not even close to 100K a day. $750M sounds too high as well. At $50 a sale they'll need 15M sales/rebills.

04-13-2004, 06:15 AM	#9
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	WOW __________________

04-13-2004, 07:35 AM	#13
ControlThy Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,909	And people wonder why Visa and Mastercard have so many rules and policies.

04-13-2004, 07:41 AM	#14
llabtaem Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Florida Posts: 969	If only they had been running a 60/40 affiliate program

04-13-2004, 07:53 AM	#16
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	that's peanuts __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

04-13-2004, 07:56 AM	#18
maxjohan Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 7,219	Something to do with Paris Hilton Scam? __________________ I went from 100 to 313,000 satoshis in 2 days! Lots of daily freerolls...

04-13-2004, 08:03 AM	#20
steffie Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Somewhere in the Mountains, far far away Posts: 2,422	Who would have thought the MOB fell that low and do PORN online ROTFL Ge Ge, who would have thought.. What's the world coming too.. PF PF __________________ Partying since '96 and not going anywhere Anna's Dorm

04-13-2004, 08:03 AM	#21
Trax [----------------------] Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 14,486	there go thousands of customers who will barely ever buy a porn membership again (in case its really true) those numbers look a little bit big to me....but... who knows)

04-13-2004, 08:05 AM	#22
web4x Will everyone please review my newest site? Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 841	Look who purchased their domains http://www.playgirldeutschland.com/

04-13-2004, 08:07 AM	#23
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300

04-13-2004, 08:13 AM	#26
Jer God is Brazilian Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Brazil Posts: 10,601	A few domains sounds familiar. Did they buy clicks from that Serge Clicks program?

04-13-2004, 08:17 AM	#27
123Jason Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: W. Hollywood Posts: 89	I actually received a letter regarding the class action lawsuit against Trans Digital saying they wrongly charged my credit card 59.99. I had to sign a paper saying I agreed with that amount and send it back...still waiting for my 59.99 __________________ Account Representative, ChiChiClicks Toll Free 1-800-997-9071 x 245 \| ICQ #267863713

04-13-2004, 08:26 AM	#28
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,462	never heard of them before __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

04-13-2004, 10:21 AM	#37
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	if any of you believe that figure you are dumb. this is exxagerated as it ALWAYS is to make the public turn an eye and pay attention. this is another smear campaign being launched against this industry. to see it any other way is denial. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

04-13-2004, 11:04 AM	#40
sexsup Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,004	Mafia is everywhere

04-13-2004, 11:11 AM	#43
JamesK hi Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 16,731	__________________ M3Server - NATS Hosting

04-13-2004, 11:12 AM	#45
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	you people act like there isnt mafia in porn. trust me. socal is ran by crooked porn mafia. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

04-13-2004, 11:24 AM	#46
Nismo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: FLORIDA Posts: 4,977	I wonder if snow was involved http://www.mafiabucks.com ? LOL __________________ i buy massive xxx dating traffic.

04-13-2004, 11:52 AM	#50
kimzar Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Your Mother's Snatch! Posts: 1,874	i agree these numbers are probably being inflated for the reason of scaring off customers and bringing more attention to porn