Server Load Question? - GoFuckYourself.com

infecto · 04-11-2004, 03:48 PM

Any of you have much knowledge with server loads using php? Trying to figure out how bogged down a server would get if I was using a bit of php in each page. Say the server is getting 100k+ hits a day across hundreds to thousands of pages. The php involved in each page would just be passing the variable from the url then including a file with variables in it based upon the variable in the url. I am comparing it to just creating static pages but of course the amount have static pages would be 10x the amount of doing it by php. But by using static pages would it relieve alot of the server load and maybe some bw? Since I would need the pages to load quickly and smoothly I am just trying to weight the options of doing it either way. If any of you sales reps from hosting companies would like helping me out give me a yell by all means (ICQ: 146664255). I am looking for nice dedicated server options at the moment =). Thanks!

the_wizz · 04-11-2004, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by infecto
If any of you sales reps from hosting companies would like helping me out give me a yell by all means (

I wouldn't ask the sales weasles about the server loads, go to a techie.

That being said....

If you're not running any kind of big overhead like mysql, then you should be safe. A small ammount of PHP isn't going to harm the server to any great extent.

infecto · 04-11-2004, 03:59 PM

Yeah at first I was thinking mysql but it would have eaten up the server. So I figured if I just stored the few variables I needed in the users file name.php and included it depending on what was passed through the url it shouldn't be that much of a load. Since the variables would only be links and the only other php needed would be to display the links and thats it.

Pun · 04-11-2004, 04:03 PM

It's always been my opinion if you can do it static, and you're going to be pushing decent volumes, do it static. Dynamic content, no matter how insignificant it seems, always produces more cpu / memory stress than a purely static html page does. If you have the means, I'd suggest just trying it out and checking for yourself, but if I were consulting on the project I'd strongly recommend strictly static provided it wasn't a burden on development.

Volantt · 04-11-2004, 06:03 PM

Checkout some PHP cache programs... Like

Turk MMcache...

V

04-11-2004, 03:48 PM	#1
infecto Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 1,697	Server Load Question? Any of you have much knowledge with server loads using php? Trying to figure out how bogged down a server would get if I was using a bit of php in each page. Say the server is getting 100k+ hits a day across hundreds to thousands of pages. The php involved in each page would just be passing the variable from the url then including a file with variables in it based upon the variable in the url. I am comparing it to just creating static pages but of course the amount have static pages would be 10x the amount of doing it by php. But by using static pages would it relieve alot of the server load and maybe some bw? Since I would need the pages to load quickly and smoothly I am just trying to weight the options of doing it either way. If any of you sales reps from hosting companies would like helping me out give me a yell by all means (ICQ: 146664255). I am looking for nice dedicated server options at the moment =). Thanks!

04-11-2004, 04:03 PM	#4
Pun Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Seattle Posts: 379	It's always been my opinion if you can do it static, and you're going to be pushing decent volumes, do it static. Dynamic content, no matter how insignificant it seems, always produces more cpu / memory stress than a purely static html page does. If you have the means, I'd suggest just trying it out and checking for yourself, but if I were consulting on the project I'd strongly recommend strictly static provided it wasn't a burden on development. __________________ TrafficHolder.com - Buy/Sell Adult Traffic ICQ: 18771941

04-11-2004, 06:03 PM	#5
Volantt Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Penguin vs Devil Posts: 745	Checkout some PHP cache programs... Like Turk MMcache... V __________________ "Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato "In the abscence of orders, go find something and kill it." - Erwin Rommel "A man's worth is no greater then the worth of his ambitions." - Marcus Aurelius

04-11-2004, 03:59 PM	#3
infecto Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 1,697	Yeah at first I was thinking mysql but it would have eaten up the server. So I figured if I just stored the few variables I needed in the users file name.php and included it depending on what was passed through the url it shouldn't be that much of a load. Since the variables would only be links and the only other php needed would be to display the links and thats it.