Public Nudity content licensed or not? - GoFuckYourself.com

Garywell · 04-09-2004, 02:42 PM

Should a contentmaker selling public nudity content provide a model realise and scaned hahahahahahahahas of a models? For example open air nudists parties, beach nudists and topless girls.

modelgigtalent · 04-09-2004, 02:51 PM

There have been recent laws regarding this thanks to Joe from girlsgonewild.

Andre · 04-09-2004, 04:13 PM

Depends on the content. My stuff is fully up to code since we pay models to be nekkid in public.

Paul Markham · 04-09-2004, 09:51 PM

Speak to a lawyer.

But the general rule of thumb is that if the model is over 18 and in a public place she is fair game.

Whether this will keep you out of trouble is vague and how you make sure she is over 18 without viewing her IDs is a hard one.

04-10-2004, 12:25 AM

If model have legal age, why not?

Garywell · 04-10-2004, 05:08 AM

There are a lot of pics in magazines where people just walk on a streets, laying on a bech summer times not nude. They are all legal to publish. You just shoot surroundings. If a person gets nude in public it's quite enormal, you know. He/She shows the hahahaha to other people getting adrenalin or pleasure. He understands that breaks some moral rules. Then from the point of moral view somehahahaha can take some pics of him and publish I think. But it's just my opinion.

Can somehahahaha give the facts when a photographer was punished by the law for selling public nudity content without ID's of the models? I'm talking about those who shurely look 18 or older. You all know that billings can decline site with legal aged content with releases and photo ID's if their legal department suppose that it looks too young.

Share some links if you have according to topic title!

Paul Waters · 04-10-2004, 05:19 AM

You can't use someone's photograph in a commercial way unless you have a model release.

The exception is *news*.

I accept that public nudity could be considered *news* if presented in a *news* forum.

The people doing public stuff are just hoping they get away with it.

My

Shoehorn! · 04-10-2004, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Garywell

Can somehahahaha give the facts when a photographer was punished by the law for selling public nudity content without ID's of the models? I'm talking about those who shurely look 18 or older. You all know that billings can decline site with legal aged content with releases and photo ID's if their legal department suppose that it looks too young.

Share some links if you have according to topic title!

Unless she's got saggy tits and grey hair you can never be sure that she's over 18. Young girls are dressing differently nowadays and wearing makeup at a younger age and all that shit. Better to be safe than sorry and somehow get proof of their legality.

Garywell · 04-12-2004, 03:31 AM

Thanks all for your comments!

04-09-2004, 02:42 PM	#1
Garywell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Czech Posts: 240	Public Nudity content licensed or not? Should a contentmaker selling public nudity content provide a model realise and scaned hahahahahahahahas of a models? For example open air nudists parties, beach nudists and topless girls.

04-09-2004, 02:51 PM	#2
modelgigtalent Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Sin Sity - Hit me here! ICQ: 165829688 Posts: 2,208	There have been recent laws regarding this thanks to Joe from girlsgonewild. __________________ Web marketing - video editing - color correcting and more. ICQ -165829688

04-09-2004, 09:51 PM	#4
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Speak to a lawyer. But the general rule of thumb is that if the model is over 18 and in a public place she is fair game. Whether this will keep you out of trouble is vague and how you make sure she is over 18 without viewing her IDs is a hard one. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

04-10-2004, 05:19 AM	#7
Paul Waters Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Toronto, Ontario Posts: 4,402	You can't use someone's photograph in a commercial way unless you have a model release. The exception is news. I accept that public nudity could be considered news if presented in a news forum. The people doing public stuff are just hoping they get away with it. My __________________ Paul

04-09-2004, 04:13 PM	#3
Andre Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Inside Your Head Posts: 1,156	Depends on the content. My stuff is fully up to code since we pay models to be nekkid in public.

04-10-2004, 12:25 AM	#5
Alex Xe Guest Posts: n/a	If model have legal age, why not?

04-10-2004, 05:08 AM	#6
Garywell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Czech Posts: 240	There are a lot of pics in magazines where people just walk on a streets, laying on a bech summer times not nude. They are all legal to publish. You just shoot surroundings. If a person gets nude in public it's quite enormal, you know. He/She shows the hahahaha to other people getting adrenalin or pleasure. He understands that breaks some moral rules. Then from the point of moral view somehahahaha can take some pics of him and publish I think. But it's just my opinion. Can somehahahaha give the facts when a photographer was punished by the law for selling public nudity content without ID's of the models? I'm talking about those who shurely look 18 or older. You all know that billings can decline site with legal aged content with releases and photo ID's if their legal department suppose that it looks too young. Share some links if you have according to topic title!

04-12-2004, 03:31 AM	#9
Garywell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Czech Posts: 240	Thanks all for your comments!