|
There are a lot of pics in magazines where people just walk on a streets, laying on a bech summer times not nude. They are all legal to publish. You just shoot surroundings. If a person gets nude in public it's quite enormal, you know. He/She shows the hahahaha to other people getting adrenalin or pleasure. He understands that breaks some moral rules. Then from the point of moral view somehahahaha can take some pics of him and publish I think. But it's just my opinion.
Can somehahahaha give the facts when a photographer was punished by the law for selling public nudity content without ID's of the models? I'm talking about those who shurely look 18 or older. You all know that billings can decline site with legal aged content with releases and photo ID's if their legal department suppose that it looks too young.
Share some links if you have according to topic title!
|