GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is this shit really necessary? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=262376)

DR_PHIL 04-01-2004 01:51 PM
fake ass shit

s9ann0 04-01-2004 01:53 PM
people who get off on that shit are fucked in the head

Cassie 04-01-2004 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by emmanuelle
The 1973 landmark case, Miller v. California, supra (as modified by two subsequent cases) established a three-pronged test for determining whether a "work" (i.e., material or performance) is obscene and, therefore, unprotected by the First Amendment. To be obscene, a judge and/or a jury must determine:
1. That the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; AND
2. That the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way, as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable law; AND
3. That a reasonable person would find that the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political and scientific value.


Therefore- most of you people using popular movie examples are comparing apples to oranges. A gory movie is not judged obscene, because the offensive scene is only one part of a collective work.

This photoset however, is entirely comprised of images that lack serious literary, artistic, political and scientific value.
so christian bale, the directors and producers of american psycho (or any other movie of equal shock and gore) can all claim artistic, political and scientific value with the murder scenes? interesting.

i guess there is artistic, political and scientific value in a freddy vs jason movie or even a movie such as 21 grams?

i dont agree with that pic and i think those who get off to that type of stuff should be shot BUT who are you, me, any of us here or the govt to judge and make a decision on what we should view? what happen to freedom of speech, freedom of expression?

the hypocritial comments i see in this post amazes me. you can shoot girls shoving 14 inch dildos in their asses or getting a facial from 45 guys; even better yet, you can promote those sites who buy the content from producers who shoot said content YET it is wrong to photograph a woman in the position she was photographed in. are you kidding me with this?

what you, I or the person in another state may not like or agree with may very well not be the opinion of the person that is in that position being photographed and it is very well not the opinion of the person viewing said content. who the hell are we to impose our opinions on others and deem it the law. christ, being in the adult business one would think eyes would be more wide open and things would be more understood.

i have found quite the opposite. i see more people on their soapboxes when the soapbox should be kicked out from underneath. YOU ARE PORN PRODUCER OR PROMOTER AND THIS IS WHAT IS PAYING YOUR DAY TO DAY LIVING...dont preach and expect someone to respect that preaching cause you cannot have it both ways.

who are you, i or anyone to decide if that photo lacks value in any venue? we arent anyone therefore all we are doing is imposing our opinion (of which we have a right to) and opinions mean nothing in the grand scheme of things.

Fletch XXX 04-01-2004 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by emmanuelle


Balloon fetish in absolutely no way has anything to do with children. If you question this for one moment, then perhaps you'd better find a new program to push. I understand though that you are just using the idea as a misguided example ;-)

The reason that I am horrified by those pictures is because people are profiting from the idea of abuse against women.
This is something that happens far too often, and the last thing that porn needs is to be associated with it.

Yes, these pictures are porn to someone. Somebody out there is spanking to them. But would you really feel good about yourself for helping that guy get his kicks? Do you really want to run the risk of giving him ideas? Yup- it's fantasy, some really sick fucker's fantasy. And he doesn't know that it's staged.

You guys all jumped all over meatholes, who I notice is back in business. Does this industry really want to support this and be associated with it? Just what sort of message is this content sending out about all of us?
Have you ever seen

http://www.totalcatfights.com ? they advertise here regularly

why, because its fantasy and implied is it not?

I have never protected meatholes

I simply voice my opinion in regards to threads like this.

I have DVD after DVD of girls being raped, beaten and killed in movies, yet a PICTURE of INSINUATED hanging is so wrong?

You must just not see where I am coming from.

There is violence against women in so many movies to argue over a gallery of some insinuated pictures is somewhat silly to me, considering the vast library of both books and movies I have both read, watched on this subject.

I have read books on gore and the history of all of this.

Just because you dont like it does not necessarily give you the capability to deny it.

here is some reading I can suggest.

Killing for Culture:
An Illustrated History of Death Film

Eaten Alive!:
Italian Cannibal and Zombie Movies

Immoral Tales:
European Sex & Horror Movies 1956-1984


:thumbsup

latinasojourn 04-01-2004 02:36 PM
each of us is blessed with a few nanoseconds of life.

and it is what we do with that small time in this world that differentiates us.

did we make the world a better place while we were here, or did we not?

cayne 04-01-2004 03:20 PM
superugly shit. :(

yuvalus 04-01-2004 03:22 PM
Man that shit is whack!

reynold 04-01-2004 07:15 PM
Damn! that is just so sick! poor girl!:BangBang:

webmaster x 04-01-2004 11:24 PM
That isn't necessary at all.:mad:

pimplink 04-02-2004 04:10 AM
no, shit!

jayeff 04-02-2004 04:59 AM
The scenes are clearly faked and thus only disgust me because of what they say about some of the males of our species. Otherwise I can't even get energized because they show the degradation of the girl involved: the vast majority of porn does that. Our customers may kid themselves they only want to look at pictures of naked women, but their choice of material makes it clear that servility and degradation are vital ingredients for many, even for the majority.

I recognize that within the arenas of all kinds of extreme tastes lurk people who one day will step outside fantasy. If I could be convinced that they would be stopped if the material which appeals to them were banned, I would say to hell with some of our freedoms. No-one should ever lose their lives or suffer horribly just so the rest of us can see stuff like this.

But most of the monsters in our society are born damaged or triggered by events in everyday life. Pictures like these are just an uncomfortable reminder that they are out there somewhere.

Living For Today 04-02-2004 05:03 AM
that girl is disgustingly skinny. eeeeeewwwwww the hip bones.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:10 AM.
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123