I'd hit it.

I abolsutely have no clue, of what these freaks are about!!! :mad:

I'm not normally fazed by anything in porn, and this is no different.

However, my only reservation would be that this may promote others to go out and carry out a real act that these pictures dipict. :2 cents:

Balloon fetish in absolutely no way has anything to do with children. If you question this for one moment, then perhaps you'd better find a new program to push. I understand though that you are just using the idea as a misguided example ;-)

The reason that I am horrified by those pictures is because people are profiting from the idea of abuse against women.
This is something that happens far too often, and the last thing that porn needs is to be associated with it.

Yes, these pictures are porn to someone. Somebody out there is spanking to them. But would you really feel good about yourself for helping that guy get his kicks? Do you really want to run the risk of giving him ideas? Yup- it's fantasy, some really sick fucker's fantasy. And he doesn't know that it's staged.

You guys all jumped all over meatholes, who I notice is back in business. Does this industry really want to support this and be associated with it? Just what sort of message is this content sending out about all of us?

Fuck yeah! That make me sick! :( :feels-hot

Its these fuckheads that makes it hard for the pornindustry.
I would not mind if some clever people stood up and hacked or dns'ed sites like that...
:2 cents:

Sick and twisted.. don't ever post this here again

Crazy shit !! :ugone2far

FUCKED UP:ak47:

Fuck it, I'd hit it. Besides if it was a malnourished man lying there you wouldn't have said shit huh. Fuck you all, kill all the bitches!

50

Hey Attention Whore- How's that broken sig working out for you?

Isn't that child porn? I thought that was illegal.

What sick fuck would get off on that shit anyway?

Sick shit...

Your fuckin 100% sick for posting that crap - people responsible for shooting shit like that that want locking up

it's implied, whooptie fuckin doo, the REAL crime here is that bitch being so skinny, she really should seek some type of help for that. aside from that there's absolutely nothing wrong with those pictures.

hows implied torture any different from playing doctor? or cops and robbers? you're not really a cop or a robber, nor is she really being hung, kicked or beaten with a bat

not sayin i agree with, or like that type of porn, but to each their own, who the fuck are YOU to push YOUR morals on anyone else? You idiots sit here and bitch about the crackdown on porn and ash<k>hahahahaha yet you're doing the exact same thing he's doing, pushing YOUR morals and beliefs on everyone else.

don't like it? simple solution don't look.

This type of content will attract the scrutiny of the DOJ. Believe it, they are looking at sites every day and are taking down the worst of the "legal but seriously offensive" offenders like scat, beasty, rape etc.

This type of content may sell but its very dangerous in the current climate.

That is fucking gross.

She sure is skinny. That's what strikes me at first glance. Then the violence against her is awful, but you CAN tell it is simulated. I hate to call it porn, because I really don't like to think about someone getting off on watching a women get abused.

BUT it is fantasy material. In Canada it is illegal, but elsewhere, until legal lines are drawn, you really can't start discriminating unless you are sure where your own lines are. There's always someone who will take the censorship farther than you intended.

She needs medical help, but then so do lots of the drug addicts in other photos. I hope she gets the help she needs.

Now go back to watching the Texas Chainsaw Massacre and be glad you can.

Damn, not saying there is anything wrong with 'fantasizing' but if you dream of shit like this, then you should be put away.



Its only a matter of time before someone builds enough courage to live out their fantasies


:BangBang:

People do. There is an argument that says if there is another outlet for these fantasies, ie: simulated pictures, then these people will have less desire to go out and commit the acts themselves in a less safe manner than that in which the pictures were created. Better to have them satisfied at home than to have them wandering the streets, trying to create their own 'porn'.

i would't make money on this, it is fucking disgusting!:mad:

I'd hit it.

http://www.sexy-celebs.net/hotlink/yeah.gif

:helpme

I agree. And that is what probably incites the disgust or repellence that so many seem to feel when seeing images like this.

It is human sympathy (that sometimes lies on a subconcious level) that makes us feel indignant towards the exploitation of certain matters.

Some people have the fantasies of brutally killing and then raping the lifeless body of another. If you 'recreate' this scenario for someone to experience, does that make it acceptable since it is only fake?

If someone with the sincere desire to hurt, maim, or torture another being is reinforced with the attitude that is is accessable and normal, then you can see why some serial rapists/killers may not see that they need help or guidance.

I'm not saying ban all of it as a matter of principal, because individual principals remain to be defined/developed. And of course it does make money, and isn't that what all of you are working for?


Is is okay for you to make bombs that you know are killing innocent people when your government is paying you top dollar to do so? Take your paycheck, go home and fuggada 'bout it, as long as you can feed your family it's okay. But what if someone in your family gets blasted by one of those bombs? Then it affects YOU. Then you have something to say. But no one else cares 'cause it's not them.

I don't think it's as black and white as you would feel better believing it to be.

Oh no, I can´t believe it, are there only ill people on this planet ?! Poor girl ! Brutality has nothing to do with erotic or sex. Sometimes I feel so damn helpless when I see such pictures. :(

This is the type of content that puts a stink on this business.

Sadly enough, there are sick fucks who buy this but that doesn't make it ok. There's a huge market for CP too, does it's profitability make it acceptable?

If we don't start keeping each other in check, buy refusing to promote or link to this kind of content, the government will come in and do it for us. And no one wants that.....

ARE YOU ALL NEW TO PORN???

this shit isent anything new its been around forever. Yes alot of people may not like it but stop acting shocked when you see it.

Try being shoked on how many people out there get off on shit like that. There wouldnt be a supply without the demand:disgust

fuck man what some limits will people go to make some $$$

that's just sick :(

I don't know what's more troubling. Those pictures of the fact that ******* is more "socially" accepted than this. :1orglaugh

Anyway..

http://porn-sex-list.com/hitit.jpg

So sick....

thats just wrong

No, it's not new and, sadly enough, it's not even really shocking. Yes, sick people do get off on it and buy it, but that doesn't make it right.

'Supply and demand' is completely correct, but that doesn't mean that we should be facilitating it's supply by promoting or linking to it.

nasty

Man, that's just wrong. I don't know what the fuck is wrong with people sometimes...

Well that comes down to the morality of each webmaster. But until there is an inforcable law against thet type of content theres not alot one can do. And even then look at cp.. Thats illegal and people do it. One can only run there own company legit and stay away from shit like that to the best of there ablility.:2 cents:

american psycho both one and (surprisingly) two were quite funny.

I agree 100%. I think it's sad how many people posted in this thread that it was ok because it was profitable.

The 1973 landmark case, Miller v. California, supra (as modified by two subsequent cases) established a three-pronged test for determining whether a "work" (i.e., material or performance) is obscene and, therefore, unprotected by the First Amendment. To be obscene, a judge and/or a jury must determine:
1. That the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; AND
2. That the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way, as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable law; AND
3. That a reasonable person would find that the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political and scientific value.


Therefore- most of you people using popular movie examples are comparing apples to oranges. A gory movie is not judged obscene, because the offensive scene is only one part of a collective work.

This photoset however, is entirely comprised of images that lack serious literary, artistic, political and scientific value.

grrrrrr....
At least their website has no aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on their homepage - like many adult sites still do. Also they do have a decent warning page on the directly accessed domain name.

I did not test search engine "link" access to sub-pages.

They should rate their site with <a href="http://www.icra.org" target="_blank" >ICRA.org</A> at least!