GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bush, you FUCKED UP AGAIN! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=254524)

Roger 03-19-2004 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
oh, what the simple minded take as facts.
after 9/11, Bush said we will go after terror and not wait for it to strike us again. The people of the US said,"go get them" We declared war on terrorism. Only liberal dopes are blind to the fact that saddam supported terror.
Oh, and believing there are no WMDs because "there never were" when proof exists to the contrary, is the hieght of stupidity. Clinton and the UN gave him 10 years to hide them.

Show me the wmd's. You know, the US justice system uses something called proof. You should be familiar with that.

Obviously he hid them so well he couldn't even find them when it came time to protect his country and himself from invasion :)

Quote:

ahahahaha, is this your argument for today child?
which country would you like to see pick a fight with, England?:1orglaugh

How about a guy who has more in common with Hitler than anyone else? A guy who terrorizes his population, enslaves 400k of them and uses terrorism. Someone like Kim Jong perhaps? Oh right, that's one terrorist we're prepared to negotiate with.

Paul Markham 03-19-2004 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks


asshat, here's a clue. If we ever need help, we'll simply divert all the help we give other countries and take care of ourselves.
Imagine a world with its held out begging hand not receiving the US handout.:1orglaugh

You really are clueless about how it works. You and Bush are on par.

How big is the US deficit?

Quote:

oh, what the simple minded take as facts.
after 9/11, Bush said we will go after terror and not wait for it to strike us again. The people of the US said,"go get them" We declared war on terrorism. Only liberal dopes are blind to the fact that saddam supported terror.
Oh, and believing there are no WMDs because "there never were" when proof exists to the contrary, is the hieght of stupidity. Clinton and the UN gave him 10 years to hide them.
You will believe what ever comes out of Bush's mouth, very sad that there are other Americans like you.

If they thought there were WMDs, why did the troops move so fast through Iraq that the front line could not be supplied in normal events, let alone an attack from WMDs. The simple answer is THEY LIED TO US but you don't seem able to grasp that.

Paul Markham 03-19-2004 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks


oh look, another half whit wants me to notice him.:1orglaugh

Even a half whit can see the truth, so what are you? :1orglaugh

Ever thought of quitting when you're losing?

12clicks 03-19-2004 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net



oh poor 12clicks... slapping Liberals around again !?! lol Looks like you are getting bitch slapped and humiliated here...

really?
last I looked, the government was doing exactly what I want them to do while you and the other liberal dopes are being spoon fed some shut the fuck up.:1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
WTF!? http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...irq.centrifuge ??

"The gas centrifuge equipment dates to Iraq's pre-1991 efforts to build nuclear weapons. "
So Saddam hide some costly equipement (centrifuges dating pre-1991) Whats wrong with that..? Was he told to destroy them!? Saddam is not a saint... and nobody would expect a good guy to destroy such things if he wasnt force to....

ahahaha, again with the moronic liberal logic that if Saddam doesn't have a nuke in his back pocket, he's the good guy and Bush is evil.


http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Achie...ievements.html ??? LOL

What the inspectors have discorvered SINCE 1991 and everything was at least prior to 1998 !! Looks to me like the UNSCOM and inperctors were doing a pretty good job... who said it wasnt working!!?!?!?!?!
[/B][/QUOTE]
only a liberal moron would call NOT finding hundreds of tons of banned weapons that were documented by the UN as possessed by the iraqis a "pretty good job":1orglaugh

slackologist 03-19-2004 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks


oh look, another half whit wants me to notice him.:1orglaugh

a half wit is a quater less than less than half a quater of the people here seem to have. but who cares. there is no argument here, just shit fighting.

Paul Markham 03-19-2004 08:57 AM

The whole "Hiding them" theory really falls down when you look at his neighbors. If they thought he did not have them or could not get them fast enough to use them they might of invaded.

The US had no real reason to invade, the financial one will soon fall away, however Iran did and if they had known the truth they might of invaded.

Saddam played a dangerous game and lost, he tried to bluff to his neighbors that he was still a force to be reckoned with, to get respect or fear. In truth his army was useless, most of the tanks and big guns were useless.

12clicks 03-19-2004 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
You will believe what ever comes out of Bush's mouth, very sad that there are other Americans like you.
sad for terrorist sympathizers like yourself, yes.

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
If they thought there were WMDs, why did the troops move so fast through Iraq that the front line could not be supplied in normal events, let alone an attack from WMDs. The simple answer is THEY LIED TO US but you don't seem able to grasp that.
Yes, the simple answer for the simple photographer is that they lied to us.
The actual answer is that they were equipped with chemical suits and didn't need to worry about wmds.
but please, continue to trot out your half assed, unsupported therories.:1orglaugh

slackologist 03-19-2004 08:59 AM

to highlight:

i like this quote "I'm the brick wall morons bang their head against "- but one day some fucking idiot will drive his head right through this wall, wont feel a thing but the damage will be done.

slackologist 03-19-2004 09:02 AM

g'night all!
have fun kids!
:winkwink: :sleep

xxxdesign-net 03-19-2004 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

only a liberal moron would call NOT finding hundreds of tons of banned weapons that were documented by the UN as possessed by the iraqis a "pretty good job":1orglaugh

LOL mmmh ... nice way to avoid my question... I know.. that was mean to ask...

As for your quote..hundreds of tons of banned weapons!?? LOL Then it should be easy to find them now right!?! HAHAHAHA

p.s. the UN documented hundreds of tons of banned weapons possessed by IRAQ... but never actually saw them.. mmh sounds like an estimation/theory rather than reality... and where the link of that again...!?

And btw, where do you find all those links? ARe you a Google buff or maybe you are a member of Rush Limbaugh's newsletter.."How the answer back to Liberals!" THey provide their sheeps alot of links like that... :thumbsup

12clicks 03-19-2004 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
The whole "Hiding them" theory really falls down when you look at his neighbors. If they thought he did not have them or could not get them fast enough to use them they might of invaded.

The US had no real reason to invade, the financial one will soon fall away, however Iran did and if they had known the truth they might of invaded.

Saddam played a dangerous game and lost, he tried to bluff to his neighbors that he was still a force to be reckoned with, to get respect or fear. In truth his army was useless, most of the tanks and big guns were useless.

The whole "fear of an Iranian invasion" theory really falls down when you consider that the US was in the north and the south of iraq and Iran would never give the US a reason to crush them (by invading iraq)

any more dopey therories you want to trot out?

12clicks 03-19-2004 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net


LOL mmmh ... nice way to avoid my question... I know.. that was mean to ask...

As for your quote..hundreds of tons of banned weapons!?? LOL Then it should be easy to find them now right!?! HAHAHAHA

p.s. the UN documented hundreds of tons of banned weapons possessed by IRAQ... but never actually saw them.. mmh sounds like an estimation/theory rather than reality... and where the link of that again...!?

And btw, where do you find all those links? ARe you a Google buff or maybe you are a member of Rush Limbaugh's newsletter.."How the answer back to Liberals!" THey provide their sheeps alot of links like that... :thumbsup

ahahahaha, so now my ability to come up with links backing up my position while you trot out, um, NOTHING means that I'm in league with Limbaugh.
typical of a liberal without a clue.
Almost as dopey as roger boy calling me a nazi because of my comments against that persecuted race.................the french!:1orglaugh

Roger 03-19-2004 09:12 AM

The only reason Iraq was invaded is because it's a weak country who wouldn't even be able to take on Qatar.

12clicks 03-19-2004 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
The only reason Iraq was invaded is because it's a weak country who wouldn't even be able to take on Qatar.
you win.:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123