Bush, you FUCKED UP AGAIN! - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Ic3m4nZ · 03-18-2004, 02:17 PM

50 who fucked up again.

Rhino22 · 03-18-2004, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

asshat, here's a clue. If we ever need help, we'll simply divert all the help we give other countries and take care of ourselves.
Imagine a world with its held out begging hand not receiving the US handout.

If that's the case, say hello to World War III.

xxxdesign-net · 03-18-2004, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

Therefore I won't post all the articles where the UN and every other country in the world agreed that there were weapons of mass destruction right up to and including the invasion of Iraq.
All this pretending they didn't exist stuff didn't start until we had trouble finding them and then the liberal dopes pounced.

Haha thats because you cant! Find me one of those articles... just for fun.. The UN and "every other country in the world" admitted of the strong possibilities... NOT a certainty.. especially after being fed "solid proofs" by the US... LOL I would be VERY CURIOUS to see the intelligence/proofs those countries had leading up to their conclusion that IRAQ had WMDs.... lol

Give up 12clicks.. you can only fool children.... (and that includes yourself) I will say it again.. asking to explain yourself was mean... Next...

Roger · 03-18-2004, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xenophobic
I have given facts behind my belief, can you prove anything of your belief he had no weapons?

during gulf war II (sounds like a bad movie) he launched chinese silkworm missiles against kuwait, these weapons were prohibited under the U.N due to their ability to reach his neighbours, if he couldn't comply with a simple missile ban, do you believe he complied with the rest of the rules outlined to him by the U.N?

(I meant kuwait, not saudi as originally posted.)

Is this a joke? The silkworm missile was in fact part of Iraq's declarations to the Security Council in December 2002 and does not violate UN sanctions.

You offer no facts and no proof whatsoever. You can lie all you want but the fact is that they do not have WMD's or else they'd have used them.

Lykos · 03-18-2004, 02:35 PM

Yeah,like he always do...

TweetyBird · 03-18-2004, 02:37 PM

WarChild · 03-18-2004, 02:38 PM

I think George Bush should go stand outside. If he sees his shadow, 6 years of Nuclear winter for Middle East.

ColBigBalls · 03-18-2004, 02:39 PM

The only WOMD used in Iraq in the last 10 years was CNN....

xenophobic · 03-18-2004, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lev

Sodium Chloride is not a gas, it is salt

well caught, my mistake I was referring to Chlorine Gas,
which can be produced from sodium chloride.

Rich · 03-18-2004, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

It's good that you weren't tempted to ask because I promised myself not to embarrass any children today.
Therefore I won't post all the articles where the UN and every other country in the world agreed that there were weapons of mass destruction right up to and including the invasion of Iraq.
All this pretending they didn't exist stuff didn't start until we had trouble finding them and then the liberal dopes pounced.

Some people (children mostly) are never happy.
They make dopey posts about how we should be in north korea instead of iraq right up until we ARE in north korea, then the liberal children explain how we shouldn't be there either.
Thats why, during the war on terror, you children and your opinions are ignored.
I know you don't like it, so run out and vote for kerry.

Do you hear yourself? I'd eat a gun if in my 30's my brain still worked like that of a small child. Good luck with that.

rett11 · 03-18-2004, 03:22 PM

I've never seen 12clicks back anything up w/ facts...don't expect him to start now.

12clicks · 03-18-2004, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich

Do you hear yourself? I'd eat a gun if in my 30's my brain still worked like that of a small child. Good luck with that.

don't worry son, when you're in your 30s you'll have multiple reasons to eat a gun.

12clicks · 03-18-2004, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

Haha thats because you cant! Find me one of those articles... just for fun.. The UN and "every other country in the world" admitted of the strong possibilities... NOT a certainty.. especially after being fed "solid proofs" by the US... LOL I would be VERY CURIOUS to see the intelligence/proofs those countries had leading up to their conclusion that IRAQ had WMDs.... lol

Give up 12clicks.. you can only fool children.... (and that includes yourself) I will say it again.. asking to explain yourself was mean... Next...

here child:
http://www.nationalreview.com/levin/levin072103.asp
read what your hero had to say and do on the subject with the full backing of liberal dopes like yourself.

12clicks · 03-18-2004, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

Haha thats because you cant! Find me one of those articles... just for fun.. The UN and "every other country in the world" admitted of the strong possibilities... NOT a certainty.. especially after being fed "solid proofs" by the US... LOL I would be VERY CURIOUS to see the intelligence/proofs those countries had leading up to their conclusion that IRAQ had WMDs.... lol

Give up 12clicks.. you can only fool children.... (and that includes yourself) I will say it again.. asking to explain yourself was mean... Next...

look child, from the UN:
http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Achie...ievements.html

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...irq.centrifuge

http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/19...so98hamza.html

"""Until 1995, Iraq denied having had any serious intention of building nuclear weapons, despite abundant evidence to the contrary uncovered by Action Team investigations. Then, after Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law and head of the Ministry of Industry and Military Industrialization, defected in August 1995, his revelations about the scope and intensity of the nuclear weapons program threatened the credibility of the government's denial.

In response to Kamel's defection, the Iraqi government produced the so-called "chicken farm documents." Several days after Kamel fled to Jordan, senior UNSCOM and Action Team officials were taken to Kamel's farm, where a half-million-page cache of documents was stashed in a shed. The documents shed light on extensive programs to develop and build weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear weapons."""
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank god your betters look out for you children.
now go run and play.

Roger · 03-18-2004, 09:37 PM

12clicks enough with the lies already. You really need to follow the stories. That insignificant thing that they dug up has been buried since the first gulf war and can serve no purpose now.
If you wanna give facts, come up with something new, not old fishy stories that even the white house doesn't look at them as proof.
As Powell said, Saddam hasn't produced any wmd capability since then.

How much longer are you gonna keep living in your dream world? If you're so concerned about the UN rules maybe you should start telling your own country to follow them. Once again, North Korea does have wmd, I'm still waiting for that invasion.

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
12clicks enough with the lies already. You really need to follow the stories. That insignificant thing that they dug up has been buried since the first gulf war and can serve no purpose now.
If you wanna give facts, come up with something new, not old fishy stories that even the white house doesn't look at them as proof.
As Powell said, Saddam hasn't produced any wmd capability since then.

How much longer are you gonna keep living in your dream world? If you're so concerned about the UN rules maybe you should start telling your own country to follow them.

poor child, reduced to prattling on about things he doesn't understand.
I wonder how you ever got it in your head that anyone believes your dopey statements?
post links to *your* facts

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
Once again, North Korea does have wmd, I'm still waiting for that invasion.

yeah, you're waiting to complain about us harrassing the poor peaceful people of NK

how embarrassing for you.

Corleone · 03-19-2004, 07:25 AM

Vote4Kerry

slackologist · 03-19-2004, 08:07 AM

Bush doesn't fuck up. He doesn't care. Learn from history you 'poor little sheep'.

To boil it down to 'With us or Against us' is childlike. Though it's been said before by the likes of people that have created true terror on the face of the earth, Ghengis Kahn, Adolf Hitler etc. Simple ideas sway simple minds.

Ahh Bush.

" The members of the International War Crimes Tribunal, meeting in New York, have carefully considered the Initial Complaint of the Commission of Inquiry dated May 6, 1991 against President George H. W. Bush, Vice President J. Danforth Quayle, Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney, Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf Commander of the Allied Forces in the Persian Gulf, and others named in the Complaint charging them with nineteen separate crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in violation of the Charter of the United Nations, the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the First Protocol thereto, and other international agreements and customary international law:

The members of the International War Crimes Tribunal finds each of the named accused Guilty on the basis of the evidence against them and that each of the nineteen crimes alleged in the Initial Complaint, attached hereto, has been established to have been committed beyond a reasonable doubt.

The members believe that it is imperative if there is ever to be peace that power be accountable for its criminal acts and we condemn in the strongest possible terms those found guilty of the charges herein. We urge the Commission of Inquiry and all people to act on recommendations developed by the Commission to hold power accountable and to secure social justice on which lasting peace must be based. "

slackologist · 03-19-2004, 08:08 AM

your daddy must be so proud. he's probably forgotten all about the coke and drunk driving already.

Roger · 03-19-2004, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
poor child, reduced to prattling on about things he doesn't understand.
I wonder how you ever got it in your head that anyone believes your dopey statements?
post links to *your* facts

My facts? The guy wasn't an imminent threat and no wmd's where found, even the US administration admits it. If that doesn't satisfy you then I'm afraid nothing will.

Quote:

yeah, you're waiting to complain about us harrassing the poor peaceful people of NK

how embarrassing for you.

Embarassing? Yes it is embarassing that Bush is a pathetic insecure guy who tries to take on small-time dictators and avoids picking up a fight with anyone who might end up actually being a threat.

beergood · 03-19-2004, 08:17 AM

May the sun never set on the US Empire!

jayeff · 03-19-2004, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by slackologist
Simple ideas sway simple minds.

Which I guess explains 12clicks position...

slackologist · 03-19-2004, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by beergood
May the sun never set on the US Empire!

Don't worry, Bush is leading america 'further into the universe' you're safe with Bushy Boy at the helm.

slackologist · 03-19-2004, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by slackologist

Don't worry, Bush is leading america 'further into the universe' you're safe with Bushy Boy at the helm.

Beam me up Bushy! (you fucktard)

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
My facts? The guy wasn't an imminent threat and no wmd's where found, even the US administration admits it. If that doesn't satisfy you then I'm afraid nothing will.

oh, what the simple minded take as facts.
after 9/11, Bush said we will go after terror and not wait for it to strike us again. The people of the US said,"go get them" We declared war on terrorism. Only liberal dopes are blind to the fact that saddam supported terror.
Oh, and believing there are no WMDs because "there never were" when proof exists to the contrary, is the hieght of stupidity. Clinton and the UN gave him 10 years to hide them.

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger

Embarassing? Yes it is embarassing that Bush is a pathetic insecure guy who tries to take on small-time dictators and avoids picking up a fight with anyone who might end up actually being a threat.

ahahahaha, is this your argument for today child?
which country would you like to see pick a fight with, England?

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff

Which I guess explains 12clicks position...

posting before the school bus comes?

Paul Markham · 03-19-2004, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rett11
try to come up with some real arguments 12clicks.

More chance of finding WMDs.

woodman · 03-19-2004, 08:44 AM

"I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then question the manner in which I provide it. I prefer you said thank you, and went on your way" JN

all you berkley grad wannabes need to get a fucking clue and realize that this is a war. i hope we learned our lesson in Vietnam about fighting a defensive war

xxxdesign-net · 03-19-2004, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

look child, from the UN:
http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Achie...ievements.html

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...irq.centrifuge

http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/19...so98hamza.html

"""Until 1995, Iraq denied having had any serious intention of building nuclear weapons, despite abundant evidence to the contrary uncovered by Action Team investigations. Then, after Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law and head of the Ministry of Industry and Military Industrialization, defected in August 1995, his revelations about the scope and intensity of the nuclear weapons program threatened the credibility of the government's denial.

In response to Kamel's defection, the Iraqi government produced the so-called "chicken farm documents." Several days after Kamel fled to Jordan, senior UNSCOM and Action Team officials were taken to Kamel's farm, where a half-million-page cache of documents was stashed in a shed. The documents shed light on extensive programs to develop and build weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear weapons."""
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank god your betters look out for you children.
now go run and play.

oh poor 12clicks... slapping Liberals around again !?! lol Looks like you are getting bitch slapped and humiliated here...

WTF!? http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...irq.centrifuge ??

"The gas centrifuge equipment dates to Iraq's pre-1991 efforts to build nuclear weapons. "
So Saddam hide some costly equipement (centrifuges dating pre-1991) Whats wrong with that..? Was he told to destroy them!? Saddam is not a saint... and nobody would expect a good guy to destroy such things if he wasnt force to.... ANd what about DAvid Kay!? Seems real excited here!! To bad he stepped down couple of months later with the strong convinction that they were no WMVs balaming severely US intelligence!!

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Achie...ievements.html ??? LOL

What the inspectors have discorvered SINCE 1991 and everything was at least prior to 1998 !! Looks to me like the UNSCOM and inperctors were doing a pretty good job... who said it wasnt working!!?!?!?!?!

So, I repeat.. where does it say that in 2003... all the major countries and UN agreed that its a certainty that Iraq is having WMDs NOW !?!?!?!?

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
More chance of finding WMDs.

oh look, another half whit wants me to notice him.

Roger · 03-19-2004, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
oh, what the simple minded take as facts.
after 9/11, Bush said we will go after terror and not wait for it to strike us again. The people of the US said,"go get them" We declared war on terrorism. Only liberal dopes are blind to the fact that saddam supported terror.
Oh, and believing there are no WMDs because "there never were" when proof exists to the contrary, is the hieght of stupidity. Clinton and the UN gave him 10 years to hide them.

Show me the wmd's. You know, the US justice system uses something called proof. You should be familiar with that.

Obviously he hid them so well he couldn't even find them when it came time to protect his country and himself from invasion

Quote:

ahahahaha, is this your argument for today child?
which country would you like to see pick a fight with, England?

How about a guy who has more in common with Hitler than anyone else? A guy who terrorizes his population, enslaves 400k of them and uses terrorism. Someone like Kim Jong perhaps? Oh right, that's one terrorist we're prepared to negotiate with.

Paul Markham · 03-19-2004, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

asshat, here's a clue. If we ever need help, we'll simply divert all the help we give other countries and take care of ourselves.
Imagine a world with its held out begging hand not receiving the US handout.

You really are clueless about how it works. You and Bush are on par.

How big is the US deficit?

Quote:

oh, what the simple minded take as facts.
after 9/11, Bush said we will go after terror and not wait for it to strike us again. The people of the US said,"go get them" We declared war on terrorism. Only liberal dopes are blind to the fact that saddam supported terror.
Oh, and believing there are no WMDs because "there never were" when proof exists to the contrary, is the hieght of stupidity. Clinton and the UN gave him 10 years to hide them.

You will believe what ever comes out of Bush's mouth, very sad that there are other Americans like you.

If they thought there were WMDs, why did the troops move so fast through Iraq that the front line could not be supplied in normal events, let alone an attack from WMDs. The simple answer is THEY LIED TO US but you don't seem able to grasp that.

Paul Markham · 03-19-2004, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

oh look, another half whit wants me to notice him.

Even a half whit can see the truth, so what are you?

Ever thought of quitting when you're losing?

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

oh poor 12clicks... slapping Liberals around again !?! lol Looks like you are getting bitch slapped and humiliated here...

really?
last I looked, the government was doing exactly what I want them to do while you and the other liberal dopes are being spoon fed some shut the fuck up.

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
WTF!? http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...irq.centrifuge ??

"The gas centrifuge equipment dates to Iraq's pre-1991 efforts to build nuclear weapons. "
So Saddam hide some costly equipement (centrifuges dating pre-1991) Whats wrong with that..? Was he told to destroy them!? Saddam is not a saint... and nobody would expect a good guy to destroy such things if he wasnt force to....

ahahaha, again with the moronic liberal logic that if Saddam doesn't have a nuke in his back pocket, he's the good guy and Bush is evil.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Achie...ievements.html ??? LOL

What the inspectors have discorvered SINCE 1991 and everything was at least prior to 1998 !! Looks to me like the UNSCOM and inperctors were doing a pretty good job... who said it wasnt working!!?!?!?!?!
[/B][/QUOTE]
only a liberal moron would call NOT finding hundreds of tons of banned weapons that were documented by the UN as possessed by the iraqis a "pretty good job"

slackologist · 03-19-2004, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

oh look, another half whit wants me to notice him.

a half wit is a quater less than less than half a quater of the people here seem to have. but who cares. there is no argument here, just shit fighting.

Paul Markham · 03-19-2004, 08:57 AM

The whole "Hiding them" theory really falls down when you look at his neighbors. If they thought he did not have them or could not get them fast enough to use them they might of invaded.

The US had no real reason to invade, the financial one will soon fall away, however Iran did and if they had known the truth they might of invaded.

Saddam played a dangerous game and lost, he tried to bluff to his neighbors that he was still a force to be reckoned with, to get respect or fear. In truth his army was useless, most of the tanks and big guns were useless.

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
You will believe what ever comes out of Bush's mouth, very sad that there are other Americans like you.

sad for terrorist sympathizers like yourself, yes.

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
If they thought there were WMDs, why did the troops move so fast through Iraq that the front line could not be supplied in normal events, let alone an attack from WMDs. The simple answer is THEY LIED TO US but you don't seem able to grasp that.

Yes, the simple answer for the simple photographer is that they lied to us.
The actual answer is that they were equipped with chemical suits and didn't need to worry about wmds.
but please, continue to trot out your half assed, unsupported therories.

slackologist · 03-19-2004, 08:59 AM

to highlight:

i like this quote "I'm the brick wall morons bang their head against "- but one day some fucking idiot will drive his head right through this wall, wont feel a thing but the damage will be done.

slackologist · 03-19-2004, 09:02 AM

g'night all!
have fun kids!

xxxdesign-net · 03-19-2004, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks

only a liberal moron would call NOT finding hundreds of tons of banned weapons that were documented by the UN as possessed by the iraqis a "pretty good job"

LOL mmmh ... nice way to avoid my question... I know.. that was mean to ask...

As for your quote..hundreds of tons of banned weapons!?? LOL Then it should be easy to find them now right!?! HAHAHAHA

p.s. the UN documented hundreds of tons of banned weapons possessed by IRAQ... but never actually saw them.. mmh sounds like an estimation/theory rather than reality... and where the link of that again...!?

And btw, where do you find all those links? ARe you a Google buff or maybe you are a member of Rush Limbaugh's newsletter.."How the answer back to Liberals!" THey provide their sheeps alot of links like that...

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
The whole "Hiding them" theory really falls down when you look at his neighbors. If they thought he did not have them or could not get them fast enough to use them they might of invaded.

The US had no real reason to invade, the financial one will soon fall away, however Iran did and if they had known the truth they might of invaded.

Saddam played a dangerous game and lost, he tried to bluff to his neighbors that he was still a force to be reckoned with, to get respect or fear. In truth his army was useless, most of the tanks and big guns were useless.

The whole "fear of an Iranian invasion" theory really falls down when you consider that the US was in the north and the south of iraq and Iran would never give the US a reason to crush them (by invading iraq)

any more dopey therories you want to trot out?

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

LOL mmmh ... nice way to avoid my question... I know.. that was mean to ask...

As for your quote..hundreds of tons of banned weapons!?? LOL Then it should be easy to find them now right!?! HAHAHAHA

p.s. the UN documented hundreds of tons of banned weapons possessed by IRAQ... but never actually saw them.. mmh sounds like an estimation/theory rather than reality... and where the link of that again...!?

And btw, where do you find all those links? ARe you a Google buff or maybe you are a member of Rush Limbaugh's newsletter.."How the answer back to Liberals!" THey provide their sheeps alot of links like that...

ahahahaha, so now my ability to come up with links backing up my position while you trot out, um, NOTHING means that I'm in league with Limbaugh.
typical of a liberal without a clue.
Almost as dopey as roger boy calling me a nazi because of my comments against that persecuted race.................the french!

Roger · 03-19-2004, 09:12 AM

The only reason Iraq was invaded is because it's a weak country who wouldn't even be able to take on Qatar.

12clicks · 03-19-2004, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
The only reason Iraq was invaded is because it's a weak country who wouldn't even be able to take on Qatar.

you win.

03-18-2004, 02:35 PM	#55
Lykos Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: World Posts: 31,027	Yeah,like he always do... __________________

03-18-2004, 02:37 PM	#56
TweetyBird Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Canadian this !!! Posts: 8,532	yup __________________ sig for sale. ICQ :338213644

03-18-2004, 03:22 PM	#61
rett11 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 397	I've never seen 12clicks back anything up w/ facts...don't expect him to start now. __________________ PussyCash pays $100 for every ImLive signup

03-19-2004, 08:57 AM	#86
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	The whole "Hiding them" theory really falls down when you look at his neighbors. If they thought he did not have them or could not get them fast enough to use them they might of invaded. The US had no real reason to invade, the financial one will soon fall away, however Iran did and if they had known the truth they might of invaded. Saddam played a dangerous game and lost, he tried to bluff to his neighbors that he was still a force to be reckoned with, to get respect or fear. In truth his army was useless, most of the tanks and big guns were useless. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

03-18-2004, 02:17 PM	#51
Ic3m4nZ Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Montreal! Posts: 6,285	50 who fucked up again.

03-18-2004, 02:38 PM	#57
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	I think George Bush should go stand outside. If he sees his shadow, 6 years of Nuclear winter for Middle East.

03-18-2004, 02:39 PM	#58
ColBigBalls Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 1,733	The only WOMD used in Iraq in the last 10 years was CNN....

03-18-2004, 09:37 PM	#65
Roger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: MetroCity Posts: 3,181	12clicks enough with the lies already. You really need to follow the stories. That insignificant thing that they dug up has been buried since the first gulf war and can serve no purpose now. If you wanna give facts, come up with something new, not old fishy stories that even the white house doesn't look at them as proof. As Powell said, Saddam hasn't produced any wmd capability since then. How much longer are you gonna keep living in your dream world? If you're so concerned about the UN rules maybe you should start telling your own country to follow them. Once again, North Korea does have wmd, I'm still waiting for that invasion.

03-19-2004, 07:25 AM	#67
Corleone C.R.E.A.M Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 15,262	Vote4Kerry

03-19-2004, 08:07 AM	#68
slackologist Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 2,379	Bush doesn't fuck up. He doesn't care. Learn from history you 'poor little sheep'. To boil it down to 'With us or Against us' is childlike. Though it's been said before by the likes of people that have created true terror on the face of the earth, Ghengis Kahn, Adolf Hitler etc. Simple ideas sway simple minds. Ahh Bush. " The members of the International War Crimes Tribunal, meeting in New York, have carefully considered the Initial Complaint of the Commission of Inquiry dated May 6, 1991 against President George H. W. Bush, Vice President J. Danforth Quayle, Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney, Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf Commander of the Allied Forces in the Persian Gulf, and others named in the Complaint charging them with nineteen separate crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in violation of the Charter of the United Nations, the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the First Protocol thereto, and other international agreements and customary international law: The members of the International War Crimes Tribunal finds each of the named accused Guilty on the basis of the evidence against them and that each of the nineteen crimes alleged in the Initial Complaint, attached hereto, has been established to have been committed beyond a reasonable doubt. The members believe that it is imperative if there is ever to be peace that power be accountable for its criminal acts and we condemn in the strongest possible terms those found guilty of the charges herein. We urge the Commission of Inquiry and all people to act on recommendations developed by the Commission to hold power accountable and to secure social justice on which lasting peace must be based. "

03-19-2004, 08:08 AM	#69
slackologist Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 2,379	your daddy must be so proud. he's probably forgotten all about the coke and drunk driving already.

03-19-2004, 08:17 AM	#71
beergood Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: United States Posts: 2,918	May the sun never set on the US Empire!

03-19-2004, 08:44 AM	#78
woodman Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 433	"I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then question the manner in which I provide it. I prefer you said thank you, and went on your way" JN all you berkley grad wannabes need to get a fucking clue and realize that this is a war. i hope we learned our lesson in Vietnam about fighting a defensive war

03-19-2004, 08:59 AM	#88
slackologist Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 2,379	to highlight: i like this quote "I'm the brick wall morons bang their head against "- but one day some fucking idiot will drive his head right through this wall, wont feel a thing but the damage will be done.

03-19-2004, 09:02 AM	#89
slackologist Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 2,379	g'night all! have fun kids!

03-19-2004, 09:12 AM	#93
Roger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: MetroCity Posts: 3,181	The only reason Iraq was invaded is because it's a weak country who wouldn't even be able to take on Qatar.