Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-22-2004, 03:20 PM   #1
NaughtyJenn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 7,355
photographers...

looking to get a wider angle lens for my digital rebel (300d) but also dont want to drop but loads of $$. right now the lens i have on it is 28-90mm and im in need of wider. any suggestions?
NaughtyJenn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 03:22 PM   #2
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
wait til you can spend some money dont go cheap in the long run its not worth it.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 03:25 PM   #3
NaughtyJenn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 7,355
Quote:
Originally posted by tony404
wait til you can spend some money dont go cheap in the long run its not worth it.
yeah i have been told that and i can appreciate it. but right now i just need a temporary fix.. i have seen some on ebay for wider angle and not sure if its a solid solution in the mean time
NaughtyJenn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 03:42 PM   #4
Dax
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,161
Wide angles for digital cameras WILL be expensive.. there are no ways to go around that..
Dax is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 03:49 PM   #5
NaughtyJenn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 7,355
i have seen some cool things when i went to the photography store but they get up their in price.. just more intrested in what im reading right now on ebay for wide angle stuff
NaughtyJenn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 05:08 PM   #6
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
Give up now, by buying a 300D you surrendered yourself to the fact that you can't have wide angle. Sorry, it's sad but true.

The lesser known fact about the 300d (and 10d, etc etc) is that the light sensor isn't 35mm but a ratio of 35mm so there's a multiplication factor on there.

So when you spend the $1400 (thats AU for me) on a nice 15mm fish eye or 1600 on a 17-40 (now THATS a nice lens) you'll end up with a 24 mm and a 27.2- 64 mm lens.

Damn, hey? That's the exact reason I went back to film.
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 05:11 PM   #7
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Originally posted by NaughtyJenn
i have seen some cool things when i went to the photography store but they get up their in price.. just more intrested in what im reading right now on ebay for wide angle stuff
Don't be tempted to buy a cheap wide-angle (i'm talking fisheye here) - the ones you see on ebay are very cheaply made, and you'll get a terrible amount of optical distortion around the image, it's just not worth it.

If you ARE looking for a cheaper wide angle solution for the 300D, the best bets are probably

http://bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/fisheye.html

and

http://www.seittipaja.fi/data/Pontif...T-X_17_mm.html

The last link specifically talks about the multiplication factor, but because it's mounted on a 10D it's only 1.4x.
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 05:48 PM   #8
NaughtyJenn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 7,355
Quote:
Originally posted by quantum-x


Don't be tempted to buy a cheap wide-angle (i'm talking fisheye here) - the ones you see on ebay are very cheaply made, and you'll get a terrible amount of optical distortion around the image, it's just not worth it.

If you ARE looking for a cheaper wide angle solution for the 300D, the best bets are probably

http://bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/fisheye.html

great site thanks just need to find where he purchased that lens for 110
NaughtyJenn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 05:49 PM   #9
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
probably ebay or some other sites like it.
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 05:56 PM   #10
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
actually jenn just bear in mind that that '28-90' you have on your 300d isn't a 28-90, but a 17-57 with the 1.6 multiplier

you are NOT going to get wide angle on a 300d.

just thought i'd let you know :D
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 06:02 PM   #11
NaughtyJenn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 7,355
Quote:
Originally posted by quantum-x
actually jenn just bear in mind that that '28-90' you have on your 300d isn't a 28-90, but a 17-57 with the 1.6 multiplier

you are NOT going to get wide angle on a 300d.

just thought i'd let you know :D
im just wanting to do more pov shots so want a wider angle it will happen just dont know how or when lol
NaughtyJenn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 06:28 PM   #12
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally posted by NaughtyJenn


im just wanting to do more pov shots so want a wider angle it will happen just dont know how or when lol
when shooting for the web it best to fill the frame up with person. Its a waste of bandwidth to see lots of room or background. So you probably can get away without the wideangle.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 08:45 PM   #13
quantum-x
Confirmed User
 
quantum-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Originally posted by NaughtyJenn


im just wanting to do more pov shots so want a wider angle it will happen just dont know how or when lol
it's not gonig to happen on a 300D.

sorry, that's jsut the reality of it.
quantum-x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 08:48 PM   #14
cold_ice
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 3,027
Quote:
Originally posted by tony404


when shooting for the web it best to fill the frame up with person. Its a waste of bandwidth to see lots of room or background. So you probably can get away without the wideangle.
tru that
cold_ice is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.