Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-18-2004, 09:42 PM   #1
404
Confirmed abUser
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
Posts: 1,154
high mp3 bit-rates

while cleaning and resaving a few 192k bit-rate mp3s with nero, i noticed the file size drops considerably, as it saves (by default?) in 80k bit-rate. i can't tell the difference in quality so why do some mp3s have such high bit-rates (and presumably unnecessarily big file sizes) to start with?
__________________
(b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b)
404 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 10:56 PM   #2
KobyBoy
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 201
The higher the bit-rate the more clearer sounding file you have. The more bitrates mean you can pack more data into the file. CD's are encoded with 128k which is suitable for most equipment. I prefer to encode my files at 192k because disk space is cheap and I like to get high-end stero equipment. I think anything above 192k requires you to be an audiophile. You're right, there is only a subtle difference between 128k and 192k but it is still hearable on my equipment. I'm sure all the audiophiles on the board could give you a better explanation. Mind you this only applies to files that are compressed at a constant bitrate. If you are worried about disk space and still want to maintain a descent quality I would suggest you encode your files at a variable bit rate (VBR). The encoding algorithm will look at your audio file and determine how much information to get rid of and how much information to keep to still maintain a good sounding audio file. The downside of VBR is that older MP3 players can't play them. 80k is a little bit too low for my taste but it it works for you, it works for you. If in doubt use a VBR encoding scheme and you'll get the best of both worlds.
Don't know which version of Nero you are using but with Nero 6 you have the option to save an audio file as an MP4. It produces significantly smaller file sizes but you can't play it back on your MP3 player only on a software player. Check to make sure how you are saving the file. Maybe you are getting significantly smaller file sizes because you are saving them as MP4s.
KobyBoy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 10:59 PM   #3
hyper
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mass Ass
Posts: 5,294
just encode them at 128
__________________
hyper is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 12:06 AM   #4
404
Confirmed abUser
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
Posts: 1,154
Quote:
Originally posted by KobyBoy

Check to make sure how you are saving the file. Maybe you are getting significantly smaller file sizes because you are saving them as MP4s.
thanks for the info . i have 5.5 which only gives an option to save in wav or mp3, and doesn't allow the saved bit-rate to be changed from the 80k it defaults to. might track down version 6 anyway.
__________________
(b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b)
404 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 12:07 AM   #5
SYNIKAL
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,795
Quote:
Originally posted by hyper
just encode them at 128
__________________
...........
SYNIKAL is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 02:03 AM   #6
beemk
CLICK HERE
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 20,829
you need 192 if you want to play on a good stereo like if you were going to burn it. cd quality is like 170-180. if its less than cd quality you can tell on a good stereo.
__________________
I host with Vacares
beemk is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 05:26 AM   #7
marttali
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 265
192 is a must, there's a big difference between 128 and 192.
marttali is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 05:32 AM   #8
Why
MFBA
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 7,230
Quote:
Originally posted by beemk
you need 192 if you want to play on a good stereo like if you were going to burn it. cd quality is like 170-180. if its less than cd quality you can tell on a good stereo.
cd is 128
Why is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.