|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed abUser
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
Posts: 1,154
|
while cleaning and resaving a few 192k bit-rate mp3s with nero, i noticed the file size drops considerably, as it saves (by default?) in 80k bit-rate. i can't tell the difference in quality so why do some mp3s have such high bit-rates (and presumably unnecessarily big file sizes) to start with?
__________________
(b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 201
|
The higher the bit-rate the more clearer sounding file you have. The more bitrates mean you can pack more data into the file. CD's are encoded with 128k which is suitable for most equipment. I prefer to encode my files at 192k because disk space is cheap and I like to get high-end stero equipment. I think anything above 192k requires you to be an audiophile. You're right, there is only a subtle difference between 128k and 192k but it is still hearable on my equipment. I'm sure all the audiophiles on the board could give you a better explanation. Mind you this only applies to files that are compressed at a constant bitrate. If you are worried about disk space and still want to maintain a descent quality I would suggest you encode your files at a variable bit rate (VBR). The encoding algorithm will look at your audio file and determine how much information to get rid of and how much information to keep to still maintain a good sounding audio file. The downside of VBR is that older MP3 players can't play them. 80k is a little bit too low for my taste but it it works for you, it works for you. If in doubt use a VBR encoding scheme and you'll get the best of both worlds.
Don't know which version of Nero you are using but with Nero 6 you have the option to save an audio file as an MP4. It produces significantly smaller file sizes but you can't play it back on your MP3 player only on a software player. Check to make sure how you are saving the file. Maybe you are getting significantly smaller file sizes because you are saving them as MP4s. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mass Ass
Posts: 5,294
|
just encode them at 128
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Confirmed abUser
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
Posts: 1,154
|
Quote:
__________________
(b] cheap hmtl programer for hire (/b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,795
|
Quote:
__________________
........... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 265
|
192 is a must, there's a big difference between 128 and 192.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
MFBA
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 7,230
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|