|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
02-14-2004, 04:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
|
MiniDV or DVCAM?
I'm about to buy a VX2100 but the PD170 has caught my attention for $800 more. I'm wondering what are the advantages of the DVCAM format vs. MiniDV? It appears that is the only difference between these two cameras, besides the XLR connections.
Anyone know what makes DVCAM so special? |
|
|
|
02-14-2004, 04:27 PM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
|
I need an answer...
|
|
|
|
|
02-14-2004, 04:32 PM
|
#3 |
|
xxx
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,547
|
I have the PD170.
The PD170 takes both tapes. the difference is not quality, but reliability. The tape runs twice as fast, and so you have much less chance of getting piclation. But the tapes only last 40 mins. DV cam tapes also cost a lot more and not easy to get. Do not get the PD170 for the DV cam side, but get it for the picture quality, sound and many other features. DV Cam tapes are used mainly for studio work. But the pic quality is the same. Its just more durable.
__________________
The Affiliate Program |
|
|
|
|
02-14-2004, 04:37 PM
|
#4 |
|
xxx
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,547
|
Also the PD170 is not consumer Sony, its Pro Sony (the pro side of Sony) and as such the camera is better built, is pro sound, pro picture.
Its also simple to use (once you set it up). You will be very please with the 170. Its a bit like choosing a Ford or a Jaguar car. Both with do the job, but the Jag will last you for much longer, and will make you feel great.
__________________
The Affiliate Program |
|
|
|
|
02-14-2004, 04:38 PM
|
#5 |
|
Programming King Pin
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 27,360
|
DVCAM!
__________________
UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!  Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !
|
|
|
|
|
02-14-2004, 07:28 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
|
Quote:
So if the picture quality is the same, then why the part about saying "get it for the picture quality"? |
|
|
|
|
|
02-14-2004, 09:38 PM
|
#7 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,465
|
Both are variations of a good format. You need to look at who your customers are. If you are just doing tapes for yourself, then it isn't important. If you clients prefer one or the other, go that way. Many media outlets (if you intend more commercial oriented stuff) don't like to handle mini-dv, they prefer a bigger format (many are on digital betacam, imagine!).
Also, considering the upcoming switch to High-def, camera purchases at this point are not a great investment, IMHO. Alex |
|
|
|
