Does CBS need a model release? - GoFuckYourself.com

MarkTiarra · 02-02-2004, 05:53 PM

They showed a tit. Don't they have to have a model release now? I wonder if this particular staged event was in response to the FCC stuff this past week.

Nysus · 02-02-2004, 05:56 PM

I think it's more likely to try to rival the Madonna / Britney kiss. Though can't be sure.

Cheers,
Matt

AaronM · 02-02-2004, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MarkTiarra
They showed a tit. Don't they have to have a model release now? I wonder if this particular staged event was in response to the FCC stuff this past week.

Since when is a model release a legal requirement for pictures of a tit?

Nysus · 02-02-2004, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM

Since when is a model release a legal requirement for pictures of a tit?

That's what he's asking.

Cheers,
Matt

iroc409 · 02-02-2004, 06:09 PM

i'm on the fence about this one. it's quite possible that in the eyes of the law, they were a few people short of what's considered a "public gathering".

wonder if she's gonna get a public indecency ticket

MarkTiarra · 02-02-2004, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409
i'm on the fence about this one. it's quite possible that in the eyes of the law, they were a few people short of what's considered a "public gathering".

wonder if she's gonna get a public indecency ticket

Nice! =]

Mr.Fiction · 02-02-2004, 06:13 PM

American right wingers are fucked up.

Being lied to about war is no problem, but show part of a boob on TV and it's time for a witch hunt.

The FCC will probably spend more time and money "investigating" this than the government will spend investigating Bush's lies about Iraq.

Peter Romero · 02-02-2004, 06:14 PM

Uh... CBS has full rights to the Super Bowl event and all of it's participants - signed & legal when they planned it a year ago. The question is, does everyone else who is starting sites on the pics & video have the rights? I don't think so.

BV · 02-02-2004, 06:16 PM

Whether she showed a tit or not a contract is needed for a gig like that. I'm pretty sure that MTV hired her so I would guess they would have the contract.

BV · 02-02-2004, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by POV Porn guy
Uh... CBS has full rights to the Super Bowl event and all of it's participants - signed & legal when they planned it a year ago. The question is, does everyone else who is starting sites on the pics & video have the rights? I don't think so.

Unless they were there and took the pictures themselves or bought from a photographer that was there I'd have to agree with you.

Peter Romero · 02-02-2004, 06:20 PM

Yes. And, I'll have to agree with you agreeing with me... don't you agree?

BV · 02-02-2004, 06:21 PM

agreed

directfiesta · 02-02-2004, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
American right wingers are fucked up.

Being lied to about war is no problem, but show part of a boob on TV and it's time for a witch hunt.

The FCC will probably spend more time and money "investigating" this than the government will spend investigating Bush's lies about Iraq.

No wonder they went after Bill for a sloppy BJ ...

MarkTiarra · 02-02-2004, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
American right wingers are fucked up.

Being lied to about war is no problem, but show part of a boob on TV and it's time for a witch hunt.

The FCC will probably spend more time and money "investigating" this than the government will spend investigating Bush's lies about Iraq.

Oh man are you right! America has some fucked up values. Show a slasher cutting up a girls tits in a horror movie and it's PG-13 entertainment. Show her boyfriend kissing or carressing those same breasts and them (god forbid) having fun/pleasure... and it's obscene!

Fucked up!

SureFire · 02-02-2004, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MarkTiarra

Oh man are you right! America has some fucked up values. Show a slasher cutting up a girls tits in a horror movie and it's PG-13 entertainment. Show her boyfriend kissing or carressing those same breasts and them (god forbid) having fun/pleasure... and it's obscene!

Fucked up!

"...Over-the-air TV channels cannot air "obscene" material at any time and cannot air "indecent" material between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. The FCC defines obscene as describing sexual conduct "in a patently offensive way" and lacking "serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value." Indecent material is not as offensive but still contains references to sex or excretions.

The FCC has come under fire from lawmakers and outside groups who say the agency hasn't done enough to shield the public from indecent programming. The Bush administration has endorsed a bill raising the $27,500 maximum fine to $275,000...."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playof...rtnersite=espn

F-up! I agreed.

Rochard · 02-02-2004, 07:11 PM

No, CBS doesn't need a model release. I would imagine that CBS paid MTV to produce the content, and I don't believe the television world has "model releases". Instead, they have contracts.

02-02-2004, 05:53 PM	#1
MarkTiarra Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NJ Posts: 3,833	Does CBS need a model release? They showed a tit. Don't they have to have a model release now? I wonder if this particular staged event was in response to the FCC stuff this past week. __________________ Retired Pornosticator

02-02-2004, 05:56 PM	#2
Nysus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 7,817	I think it's more likely to try to rival the Madonna / Britney kiss. Though can't be sure. Cheers, Matt __________________ What name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets See https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/948258-untouchedmarkets-pr0-refund-money-post16744521.html and for more detailed see https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/948645-re-recent-bullshit-drama-explained-detail-pr0-untouched-markets.html

02-02-2004, 06:09 PM	#5
iroc409 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: midwest side, yo Posts: 4,728	i'm on the fence about this one. it's quite possible that in the eyes of the law, they were a few people short of what's considered a "public gathering". wonder if she's gonna get a public indecency ticket __________________ <a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a> icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0 Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!

02-02-2004, 06:13 PM	#7
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	American right wingers are fucked up. Being lied to about war is no problem, but show part of a boob on TV and it's time for a witch hunt. The FCC will probably spend more time and money "investigating" this than the government will spend investigating Bush's lies about Iraq. __________________ Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU \| Free Speech Coalition \| EFF \| IMPA

02-02-2004, 06:14 PM	#8
Peter Romero Long time no happy ending Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: San Diego CA Posts: 10,578	Uh... CBS has full rights to the Super Bowl event and all of it's participants - signed & legal when they planned it a year ago. The question is, does everyone else who is starting sites on the pics & video have the rights? I don't think so. __________________ POVCash [email protected] See them all here: http://www.Petergirls.com

02-02-2004, 06:16 PM	#9
BV wtf Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Bikini State, FL USA Posts: 10,914	Whether she showed a tit or not a contract is needed for a gig like that. I'm pretty sure that MTV hired her so I would guess they would have the contract.

02-02-2004, 06:20 PM	#11
Peter Romero Long time no happy ending Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: San Diego CA Posts: 10,578	Yes. And, I'll have to agree with you agreeing with me... don't you agree? __________________ POVCash [email protected] See them all here: http://www.Petergirls.com

02-02-2004, 06:21 PM	#12
BV wtf Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Bikini State, FL USA Posts: 10,914	agreed

02-02-2004, 07:11 PM	#16
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,038	No, CBS doesn't need a model release. I would imagine that CBS paid MTV to produce the content, and I don't believe the television world has "model releases". Instead, they have contracts. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION