something about the Jackson tit excuse doesn't add up - GoFuckYourself.com

Amputate Your Head · 02-02-2004, 01:15 PM

they said it was some sort of costume malfunction..... so what he was "supposed" to be tearing off? If you look at her outfit, what else is there to tear off?

someone post the pic here so we can examine it closer

doober · 02-02-2004, 01:17 PM

yes lets defenitely waste more time on this

freeadultcontent · 02-02-2004, 01:17 PM

Im guessing her latex face, to reveal to the world the Jacksons are really lizard people.

Fletch XXX · 02-02-2004, 01:17 PM

it was no malfunction.

watch the vid, justin is a horrioble actor, and you can see him doing it. he knows its coming, and then does it. a stunt. nothing more.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=229979

Krome · 02-02-2004, 01:18 PM

If it was a costume malfunction then why did she have a friggin ninja star glued to her breast?

DarkJedi · 02-02-2004, 01:19 PM

see the metal buttons ?
they are supposed to come off.

webair · 02-02-2004, 01:20 PM

or the fact that the deal ripped off with pinpoint accuracy velcro perhaps?

Smokey The Bear · 02-02-2004, 01:20 PM

They rehearse these things ahead of times , and they arent supposed to change things on the fly.

I call BULLSHIT , because , they obviously planned something, and if that wasnt what they planned why didnt he just say so.

Like . " i was going to grab at her arm and she was supposed to grab my arm and stop me but i slipped and caught my hand on the material next to her breast and it accidently tore off the front of her costume. "

okny · 02-02-2004, 01:20 PM

It was meant to happen after everybody started puting the heat on them only then they said it's now a mistake or atleast that's the way it looks to me.

BradShaw · 02-02-2004, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
they said it was some sort of costume malfunction..... so what he was "supposed" to be tearing off? If you look at her outfit, what else is there to tear off?

someone post the pic here so we can examine it closer

How fried were you last night? Welcome to yesterday.

Rich · 02-02-2004, 01:26 PM

It's obviously a stunt, it's just too bad they couldn't find someone with nice tits to do it, like Jessica Simpson or Brittney.

webair · 02-02-2004, 01:27 PM

personally i didnt mind a peek at her tit but there are kids watching the game...

poor taste

Buff · 02-02-2004, 01:27 PM

Well, it was either intentional or Justin Timberlake committed sexual assault in front of close to 1 billion people. Will be hard for him to talk his way out of that.

pamphage · 02-02-2004, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
It's obviously a stunt, it's just too bad they couldn't find someone with nice tits to do it, like Jessica Simpson or Brittney.

ditto

JerseyPuma · 02-02-2004, 01:30 PM

It definitely wasnt intentional...its pure coincidence that he ripped it off at the exact moment in his song when he sang the line "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song".

BRISK · 02-02-2004, 01:30 PM

It was all done on purpose. Then they lied and said it was an accident so they wouldn't get in trouble with the FCC.

playa · 02-02-2004, 01:31 PM

I though her tits look pretty good,
don't forget she got body armour under her tits

rebel23 · 02-02-2004, 01:33 PM

Bush's boys are gonna come down hard on this

BRISK · 02-02-2004, 01:34 PM

Janet & Justin @ Superbowl = PR Stunt

Britney/Madonna/Christina tongue kissing = PR Stunt

Ben & J.Lo marriage = PR Stunt

Ross · 02-02-2004, 01:34 PM

It was defo supposed to come off.

chodadog · 02-02-2004, 01:40 PM

She wouldn't have been wearing that nipple ornament if it wasn't supposed to come off. Why would she be wearing it, otherwise?

It looked totally intentional. Along with the timing (the lyric "have you naked by the end of this song"). Too obvious.

Libertine · 02-02-2004, 01:41 PM

The red thingy was supposed to stay on, only the black thingy was supposed to come off. So yes, ripping something off was intentional but no, exposing her pierced titty was not intentional.

stocktrader23 · 02-02-2004, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
She wouldn't have been wearing that nipple ornament if it wasn't supposed to come off. Why would she be wearing it, otherwise?

It looked totally intentional. Along with the timing (the lyric "have you naked by the end of this song"). Too obvious.

Duh, intentional or not he would still do it at that part of the song. What they are saying is he was only supposed to rip off the black part exposing a bra maybe? Like I said, it doesn't matter if they planned on the full exposure or not they would still do it at that exact time.

Smokey The Bear · 02-02-2004, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
The red thingy was supposed to stay on, only the black thingy was supposed to come off. So yes, ripping something off was intentional but no, exposing her pierced titty was not intentional.

Thats seems more plausable. That would be going a little far for a stunt to just expose her bare breast , knowing millions of kids will be watching. ( not that there is anything different between that and the E ENTERTAINMENT models showing bare breasts, but i still think they wouldnt have done that on purpose.

She was wearing the nipple ring to accentuate her nipples under the leather. Look at her left breast ( on the right side of the picture ) of her unexposed breast, you can see she also has a nipple ring on the other breast as well.

freeadultcontent · 02-02-2004, 01:48 PM

I can not believe anyone even really cares. True it was 5:30 pst or 8:30 est so children could be present yet they paned away quickly, and it was covered by a huge piercing that most thought was a pasty which would of made it kosher anyways. Then wasnt there an adult content advisory warning pre half time anyways or was I just in a snack food brain comatose and imagined that? Wasnt there also a male streaker running amok as well?

All that aside, screw the children. I am sick of the whole fucking "what about the kids" excuses for everything. You are turning on a television show that glorfies violence, is sold with sex, and endorsed by alcohol. What in the fuck do you expect? If a player had gotten a compound fracture from a vicious hit the station and the NFL would have shown in 20 times from different camera angles, in slow motion and in extreme zoom. This would be ok right? Though somehow the hint of nudity will warp fragile young minds. Give me a fucking break.

I see more nudity at the acadamy awards every year than I did watching the super bowl and nobody gives a rats ass. So why in the hell does it matter in this case.

Furious_Male · 02-02-2004, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
The red thingy was supposed to stay on, only the black thingy was supposed to come off. So yes, ripping something off was intentional but no, exposing her pierced titty was not intentional.

Not that I give a shit but I am still drawn to these threads

.. I think this punkworld is bringing up a very valid point. You can see the red sheath on the other breast and the expression on her face stunt or not is of "something gone wrong".

Amputate Your Head · 02-02-2004, 01:52 PM

but the red thing isn't even a whole piece... some of the other pics show the inside of that thing and the red thing is only a small strip across the top... no way that was supposed to stay on, cause there's nothing there... it's just like, trimming or something

Smokey The Bear · 02-02-2004, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male

Not that I give a shit but I am still drawn to these threads .. I think this punkworld is bringing up a very valid point. You can see the red sheath on the other breast and the expression on her face stunt or not is of "something gone wrong".

True but they will still be in hot water i think. Because they arent allowed to just pull a stunt , everything is choreagraphed and rehearsed ahead of time in front of the cbs exec's so they can give it the green light. The cbs execs take the heat from the fcc , so they have to approve everything.

Whatever stunt they pulled , they knew they were pulling a stunt and did so without approval. If i was cbs i would sue them..

Ash@phpFX · 02-02-2004, 01:57 PM

who gives a fuck?

Smokey The Bear · 02-02-2004, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by asher
who gives a fuck?

28 people so far. Including you.

Amputate Your Head · 02-02-2004, 02:01 PM

also, how is this any worse than Howard Stern intentionally hanging his nasty ass out of the Fartman suit at the award show way back?

Skincitymodels · 02-02-2004, 02:11 PM

ok here is the mistake........ she has snaps all around the bottom of the cup if you look at the close up pics.. it was designed to come off with a good yank........ Hmm suppose that Justin Knew that? Hmm suppose that Janet Knew that? Ill put money on it that it was all planned. Just look at the publicity it got her. even if they slap her with a 10,000 dollar fine....... Can you buy publicity like that for 10 grand? hell no!! Smart girl!! heres the pic

hottoddy · 02-02-2004, 02:15 PM

I see a face in that gnarled nipple.

WankTank · 02-02-2004, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by doober
yes lets defenitely waste more time on this

asuna · 02-02-2004, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
Janet & Justin @ Superbowl = PR Stunt

Britney/Madonna/Christina tongue kissing = PR Stunt

Ben & J.Lo marriage = PR Stunt

What do you expect? MTV produced it

xxxdesign-net · 02-02-2004, 02:34 PM

If you gonna expose your tit... wouldnt you try your best to have your tit in the best position possible so it would actually look good..? Her tit is all squeezed up...

Well.. guess not.. since Im sure it was planned! lol

if the red thing was a bra.. it would have stayed on.. why make it detachable.!?

Danny_C · 02-02-2004, 02:36 PM

How does it hurt the kids and the families to see a tit? I think it hurts kids more to make them scared of tits.

Amputate Your Head · 02-02-2004, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Danny_C
How does it hurt the kids and the families to see a tit? I think it hurts kids more to make them scared of tits.

it's wrongfully perpetuating the violent act of tearing women's clothes off in public.

Furious_Male · 02-02-2004, 02:38 PM

Good points both sides. Now I no longer have an opinion if it was intentional or not.

I better just stick with not giving a flying fuck.

Theo · 02-02-2004, 02:41 PM

well said freeadultcontent

xxxdesign-net · 02-02-2004, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Amputate Your Head

it's wrongfully perpetuating the violent act of tearing women's clothes off in public.

oh give me a freakin' break... you're the first one I heard coming up with something like this... Even the FTC didnt think of that

btw... is tearing off women clothes in public an ongoing problem in the US ?

But you were joking right?

Amputate Your Head · 02-02-2004, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

btw... is tearing off women clothes in public an ongoing problem in the US ?

it will be now....

you know how people love to mimic everything celebrities do. This will be happening everywhere now. Just wait and see.

EZRhino · 02-02-2004, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by doober
yes lets defenitely waste more time on this

I agree .........lets

02-02-2004, 01:15 PM	#1
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	something about the Jackson tit excuse doesn't add up they said it was some sort of costume malfunction..... so what he was "supposed" to be tearing off? If you look at her outfit, what else is there to tear off? someone post the pic here so we can examine it closer __________________ SIG TOO BIG

02-02-2004, 01:17 PM	#3
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	Im guessing her latex face, to reveal to the world the Jacksons are really lizard people. __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

02-02-2004, 01:17 PM	#4
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	it was no malfunction. watch the vid, justin is a horrioble actor, and you can see him doing it. he knows its coming, and then does it. a stunt. nothing more. http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=229979 __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

02-02-2004, 01:20 PM	#7
webair Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: NYC, NY Posts: 8,531	or the fact that the deal ripped off with pinpoint accuracy velcro perhaps? __________________ ~ Webair Dedicated Cloud Servers™ ~ WEBAIR VSYS™ Virtual Hosting Platform ~ Superior CDN Network ~ ~ Managed Dedicated hosting Specialists ~ DISCOUNT DOMAIN NAMES! ~ WEBAIR FUSION IO MANAGED CLOUD SERVERS! ~ *ICQ:* 243116321 - *TWITTER* - @WEBAIRINC - E-Mail: [email protected]

02-02-2004, 01:20 PM	#9
okny Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Vault Posts: 5,761	It was meant to happen after everybody started puting the heat on them only then they said it's now a mistake or atleast that's the way it looks to me. __________________ Aim: okny Icq: 306232 Skype: OlegKrasBT

02-02-2004, 01:17 PM	#2
doober Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: in yoOoo kitchen Posts: 6,984	yes lets defenitely waste more time on this

02-02-2004, 01:18 PM	#5
Krome Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: London - UK Posts: 2,851	If it was a costume malfunction then why did she have a friggin ninja star glued to her breast?

02-02-2004, 01:19 PM	#6
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	see the metal buttons ? they are supposed to come off.

02-02-2004, 01:20 PM	#8
Smokey The Bear So Fucking Banned Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: South Of Heaven™ Posts: 3,880	They rehearse these things ahead of times , and they arent supposed to change things on the fly. I call BULLSHIT , because , they obviously planned something, and if that wasnt what they planned why didnt he just say so. Like . " i was going to grab at her arm and she was supposed to grab my arm and stop me but i slipped and caught my hand on the material next to her breast and it accidently tore off the front of her costume. "

02-02-2004, 01:26 PM	#11
Rich So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 11,486	It's obviously a stunt, it's just too bad they couldn't find someone with nice tits to do it, like Jessica Simpson or Brittney.

02-02-2004, 01:27 PM	#12
webair Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: NYC, NY Posts: 8,531	personally i didnt mind a peek at her tit but there are kids watching the game... poor taste __________________ ~ Webair Dedicated Cloud Servers™ ~ WEBAIR VSYS™ Virtual Hosting Platform ~ Superior CDN Network ~ ~ Managed Dedicated hosting Specialists ~ DISCOUNT DOMAIN NAMES! ~ WEBAIR FUSION IO MANAGED CLOUD SERVERS! ~ *ICQ:* 243116321 - *TWITTER* - @WEBAIRINC - E-Mail: [email protected]

02-02-2004, 01:27 PM	#13
Buff GFY Assassin Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,993	Well, it was either intentional or Justin Timberlake committed sexual assault in front of close to 1 billion people. Will be hard for him to talk his way out of that.

02-02-2004, 01:30 PM	#15
JerseyPuma Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: FL Posts: 1,149	It definitely wasnt intentional...its pure coincidence that he ripped it off at the exact moment in his song when he sang the line "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song". __________________ LOVERCASH.COM good dating sites.

02-02-2004, 01:30 PM	#16
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	It was all done on purpose. Then they lied and said it was an accident so they wouldn't get in trouble with the FCC. __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

02-02-2004, 01:31 PM	#17
playa Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: atlanta, GA Posts: 6,432	I though her tits look pretty good, don't forget she got body armour under her tits

02-02-2004, 01:33 PM	#18
rebel23 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 817	Bush's boys are gonna come down hard on this

02-02-2004, 01:34 PM	#19
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	Janet & Justin @ Superbowl = PR Stunt Britney/Madonna/Christina tongue kissing = PR Stunt Ben & J.Lo marriage = PR Stunt __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

02-02-2004, 01:34 PM	#20
Ross Ik ben een aap Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Traffic Force Towers, Canada! Posts: 18,874	It was defo supposed to come off.

02-02-2004, 01:40 PM	#21
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	She wouldn't have been wearing that nipple ornament if it wasn't supposed to come off. Why would she be wearing it, otherwise? It looked totally intentional. Along with the timing (the lyric "have you naked by the end of this song"). Too obvious. __________________ 26 + 6 = 1

02-02-2004, 01:41 PM	#22
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	The red thingy was supposed to stay on, only the black thingy was supposed to come off. So yes, ripping something off was intentional but no, exposing her pierced titty was not intentional. __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

02-02-2004, 01:48 PM	#25
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	I can not believe anyone even really cares. True it was 5:30 pst or 8:30 est so children could be present yet they paned away quickly, and it was covered by a huge piercing that most thought was a pasty which would of made it kosher anyways. Then wasnt there an adult content advisory warning pre half time anyways or was I just in a snack food brain comatose and imagined that? Wasnt there also a male streaker running amok as well? All that aside, screw the children. I am sick of the whole fucking "what about the kids" excuses for everything. You are turning on a television show that glorfies violence, is sold with sex, and endorsed by alcohol. What in the fuck do you expect? If a player had gotten a compound fracture from a vicious hit the station and the NFL would have shown in 20 times from different camera angles, in slow motion and in extreme zoom. This would be ok right? Though somehow the hint of nudity will warp fragile young minds. Give me a fucking break. I see more nudity at the acadamy awards every year than I did watching the super bowl and nobody gives a rats ass. So why in the hell does it matter in this case. __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

02-02-2004, 01:52 PM	#27
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	but the red thing isn't even a whole piece... some of the other pics show the inside of that thing and the red thing is only a small strip across the top... no way that was supposed to stay on, cause there's nothing there... it's just like, trimming or something __________________ SIG TOO BIG

02-02-2004, 01:57 PM	#29
Ash@phpFX Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 4,292	who gives a fuck?

02-02-2004, 02:01 PM	#31
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	also, how is this any worse than Howard Stern intentionally hanging his nasty ass out of the Fartman suit at the award show way back? __________________ SIG TOO BIG

02-02-2004, 02:11 PM	#32
Skincitymodels Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Las Vegas NV Posts: 103	ok here is the mistake........ she has snaps all around the bottom of the cup if you look at the close up pics.. it was designed to come off with a good yank........ Hmm suppose that Justin Knew that? Hmm suppose that Janet Knew that? Ill put money on it that it was all planned. Just look at the publicity it got her. even if they slap her with a 10,000 dollar fine....... Can you buy publicity like that for 10 grand? hell no!! Smart girl!! heres the pic __________________ Want some women? go to www.skincitymodels.com e mail [email protected]

02-02-2004, 02:15 PM	#33
hottoddy Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: PacNorWest Posts: 3,048	I see a face in that gnarled nipple. __________________ - *** -

02-02-2004, 02:34 PM	#36
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	If you gonna expose your tit... wouldnt you try your best to have your tit in the best position possible so it would actually look good..? Her tit is all squeezed up... Well.. guess not.. since Im sure it was planned! lol if the red thing was a bra.. it would have stayed on.. why make it detachable.!?

02-02-2004, 02:36 PM	#37
Danny_C Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Philadelphia, PA Posts: 2,160	How does it hurt the kids and the families to see a tit? I think it hurts kids more to make them scared of tits.

02-02-2004, 02:38 PM	#39
Furious_Male Doing the grind since 99 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Buffalo NY Posts: 16,883	Good points both sides. Now I no longer have an opinion if it was intentional or not. I better just stick with not giving a flying fuck. __________________ Living in Virtual Reality Contact: Email (preferred): furiousmale .at. gmail - Skype: live:shanedws

02-02-2004, 02:41 PM	#40
Theo HAL 9000 Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 34,515	well said freeadultcontent