something about the Jackson tit excuse doesn't add up
 

they said it was some sort of costume malfunction..... so what he was "supposed" to be tearing off? If you look at her outfit, what else is there to tear off?

someone post the pic here so we can examine it closer

yes lets defenitely waste more time on this

:1orglaugh

Im guessing her latex face, to reveal to the world the Jacksons are really lizard people.

it was no malfunction.

watch the vid, justin is a horrioble actor, and you can see him doing it. he knows its coming, and then does it. a stunt. nothing more.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=229979

If it was a costume malfunction then why did she have a friggin ninja star glued to her breast?

http://www.skoopy.com/misc/janet.jpg


see the metal buttons ?
they are supposed to come off.

or the fact that the deal ripped off with pinpoint accuracy velcro perhaps?

They rehearse these things ahead of times , and they arent supposed to change things on the fly.

I call BULLSHIT , because , they obviously planned something, and if that wasnt what they planned why didnt he just say so.

Like . " i was going to grab at her arm and she was supposed to grab my arm and stop me but i slipped and caught my hand on the material next to her breast and it accidently tore off the front of her costume. "

It was meant to happen after everybody started puting the heat on them only then they said it's now a mistake or atleast that's the way it looks to me.

How fried were you last night? Welcome to yesterday.

It's obviously a stunt, it's just too bad they couldn't find someone with nice tits to do it, like Jessica Simpson or Brittney.

personally i didnt mind a peek at her tit but there are kids watching the game...

poor taste

Well, it was either intentional or Justin Timberlake committed sexual assault in front of close to 1 billion people. Will be hard for him to talk his way out of that.

ditto

It definitely wasnt intentional...its pure coincidence that he ripped it off at the exact moment in his song when he sang the line "Gonna have you naked by the end of this song".

It was all done on purpose. Then they lied and said it was an accident so they wouldn't get in trouble with the FCC.

I though her tits look pretty good,
don't forget she got body armour under her tits

Bush's boys are gonna come down hard on this

Janet & Justin @ Superbowl = PR Stunt

Britney/Madonna/Christina tongue kissing = PR Stunt

Ben & J.Lo marriage = PR Stunt

It was defo supposed to come off.

She wouldn't have been wearing that nipple ornament if it wasn't supposed to come off. Why would she be wearing it, otherwise?

It looked totally intentional. Along with the timing (the lyric "have you naked by the end of this song"). Too obvious.

The red thingy was supposed to stay on, only the black thingy was supposed to come off. So yes, ripping something off was intentional but no, exposing her pierced titty was not intentional.

Duh, intentional or not he would still do it at that part of the song. What they are saying is he was only supposed to rip off the black part exposing a bra maybe? Like I said, it doesn't matter if they planned on the full exposure or not they would still do it at that exact time.

Thats seems more plausable. That would be going a little far for a stunt to just expose her bare breast , knowing millions of kids will be watching. ( not that there is anything different between that and the E ENTERTAINMENT models showing bare breasts, but i still think they wouldnt have done that on purpose.

She was wearing the nipple ring to accentuate her nipples under the leather. Look at her left breast ( on the right side of the picture ) of her unexposed breast, you can see she also has a nipple ring on the other breast as well.

I can not believe anyone even really cares. True it was 5:30 pst or 8:30 est so children could be present yet they paned away quickly, and it was covered by a huge piercing that most thought was a pasty which would of made it kosher anyways. Then wasnt there an adult content advisory warning pre half time anyways or was I just in a snack food brain comatose and imagined that? Wasnt there also a male streaker running amok as well?

All that aside, screw the children. I am sick of the whole fucking "what about the kids" excuses for everything. You are turning on a television show that glorfies violence, is sold with sex, and endorsed by alcohol. What in the fuck do you expect? If a player had gotten a compound fracture from a vicious hit the station and the NFL would have shown in 20 times from different camera angles, in slow motion and in extreme zoom. This would be ok right? Though somehow the hint of nudity will warp fragile young minds. Give me a fucking break.

I see more nudity at the acadamy awards every year than I did watching the super bowl and nobody gives a rats ass. So why in the hell does it matter in this case.

Not that I give a shit but I am still drawn to these threads :1orglaugh .. I think this punkworld is bringing up a very valid point. You can see the red sheath on the other breast and the expression on her face stunt or not is of "something gone wrong".

but the red thing isn't even a whole piece... some of the other pics show the inside of that thing and the red thing is only a small strip across the top... no way that was supposed to stay on, cause there's nothing there... it's just like, trimming or something

True but they will still be in hot water i think. Because they arent allowed to just pull a stunt , everything is choreagraphed and rehearsed ahead of time in front of the cbs exec's so they can give it the green light. The cbs execs take the heat from the fcc , so they have to approve everything.

Whatever stunt they pulled , they knew they were pulling a stunt and did so without approval. If i was cbs i would sue them..

who gives a fuck?

28 people so far. Including you.

also, how is this any worse than Howard Stern intentionally hanging his nasty ass out of the Fartman suit at the award show way back?

ok here is the mistake........ she has snaps all around the bottom of the cup if you look at the close up pics.. it was designed to come off with a good yank........ Hmm suppose that Justin Knew that? Hmm suppose that Janet Knew that? Ill put money on it that it was all planned. Just look at the publicity it got her. even if they slap her with a 10,000 dollar fine....... Can you buy publicity like that for 10 grand? hell no!! Smart girl!! heres the pic

http://drudgereport.com/jjt.jpg

I see a face in that gnarled nipple.

What do you expect? MTV produced it

If you gonna expose your tit... wouldnt you try your best to have your tit in the best position possible so it would actually look good..? Her tit is all squeezed up...

Well.. guess not.. since Im sure it was planned! lol

if the red thing was a bra.. it would have stayed on.. why make it detachable.!?

How does it hurt the kids and the families to see a tit? I think it hurts kids more to make them scared of tits.

it's wrongfully perpetuating the violent act of tearing women's clothes off in public.

Good points both sides. Now I no longer have an opinion if it was intentional or not.

I better just stick with not giving a flying fuck.

well said freeadultcontent

oh give me a freakin' break... you're the first one I heard coming up with something like this... Even the FTC didnt think of that

btw... is tearing off women clothes in public an ongoing problem in the US ? :eek7


But you were joking right? :winkwink:

it will be now....

you know how people love to mimic everything celebrities do. This will be happening everywhere now. Just wait and see.

I agree .........lets