OMG that is the funniest thing I have heard in a while. :1orglaugh

He feels that everyone should be nuked, except for Iraqis who shall be saved :)

Thank you!! :)

:1orglaugh

No we invaded because for years Saddam failed to comply with the UN resolutions. He was given chances time and time again and not once ever complied without first being threatened. If Clinton had any balls and wasn't spending all his time getting hummers this could have been resolved years ago.

But yes, I think we should bomb the living shit out of every country that has a government like that. Because one day, one of these countries is gonna do something stupid and millions of people are gonna die. And fucking moron's like you are gonna turn around blame the US for not acting against them sooner.

We just can't win with people like you. No matter what we do we're fucked. So since we're gonna be fucked no matter what, we should just start bombing them all.

I find it so funny that the US is always on everyone's shit list till they get shit on and then all of a sudden they come begging to us for help. We're always the first to help in any crisis no matter who it is.

But it's is easy to play Monday morning quarterback isn't it. You are obviously set in your opinions and no amount of fact will ever convince you other wise. It was made very clear why we invaded Iraq. But all dipshits like you want to think about is what you think the real reason is. Do you know what the difference between fact and opinion is? For example, if I were to post that you are a massive tool. Would that make it true because I said it? No it wouldn't. However, if I posted that you are a massive tool and used some of your posts to back me up, then it would be fact. See the difference? It's your opinion why the US invaded Iraq. Unfortunately it is not based on any fact.

Now that is funny. :1orglaugh

Funny how somehow Chirac's involvement with Iraq is of more concern to people than Bush's involvement with the Bin Laden's and Saudi Arabia.

:1orglaugh

So are you gonna invade all countries who fail to comply with UN resolutions now?

Quote:

But yes, I think we should bomb the living shit out of every country that has a government like that. Because one day, one of these countries is gonna do something stupid and millions of people are gonna die. And fucking moron's like you are gonna turn around blame the US for not acting against them sooner.

There was no chance that Saddam was gonna do something stupid, he's not that crazy. Problem is that powerfull countries are left alone because they actually are a danger.

Quote:

I find it so funny that the US is always on everyone's shit list till they get shit on and then all of a sudden they come begging to us for help. We're always the first to help in any crisis no matter who it is.

Last I checked Iraqis wheren't begging for help. Poor people in Congo are begging for help because 4 million of them have been slaughtered and nobody cares.

i'd love if the U.S. and Brits decided to take France on, would be over before the first plane left the runway.

Liberate the fuckers, give them baths, shave their womens underarms and put them to work the way they did for Hitler - they are amazingly productive when under occupation.

You're an idiot. Of course it'll be over quick because all 3 countries will be destroyed by nukes.

50 bribed frenchmen

The world would be a sad place if we all felt like you. What happnens to the people who die in the bombings?

Oh I forgot, they don't matter because they are foreigners, right?

What is somewhat ironic is that I imagine the exremists that attacked the USA feel exactly the same as you do. Kill them all, they're evil deep down anyway.

Pardon me, did the United States not violate the UN by going into Iraq? What are the consequences of that?

Again, ironically, neither was the invasion.

So are you gonna invade all countries who fail to comply with UN resolutions now?

Sure as long as they pose a threat.

There was no chance that Saddam was gonna do something stupid, he's not that crazy. Problem is that powerfull countries are left alone because they actually are a danger.

This is now on my top two list of stupidest fucking things I have ever heard my life. He's not that crazy? He thinks he's related to Jesus, he promised the mother of all wars in 91 and yet his army gave like cowards, his sons were rapists and murderers. He gassed his own people. He tortured his own people. That's not crazy? No my friend, the threat isn't powerful countries left alone. The threat is that evil will always prevail when good men sit by and do nothing.


Last I checked Iraqis wheren't begging for help. Poor people in Congo are begging for help because 4 million of them have been slaughtered and nobody cares.

They've been begging for help for years but that is irrelevant. The war wasn't about them begging for help. I've noticed you have a bad habit of trying to make things up. Are you aware of this?

And people in the Congo? Ok, so what are you doing about it? You talk a good game but I don't see you do anything about it. But let me got this straight. So now your argument is that we shouldn't have attacked Iraq because if we're not gonna help everyone that asks for help than we shouldn't help anyone at all?

I have to ask. We're you born a tard or is it something you've developed over time?

Why oh why do people as closed minded as you say things like that.

Why do free countries like the USA, UK, Australia and a bunch of others need to warrant taking a man out of power that has been torturing and killing his OWN people for decades.

HUH ???

WHY !!!!!!!

All the is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Well Saddam posed no threat and even Powell said on February 2001 that Saddam wasn't even able to threaten his neighbours with conventional weapons. Seriously, if Saddam is a threat then who isn't? Let's declare war on all countries then.

Bush thinks God is telling him which countries to invade.
He never tried to invade the US. So why are you doing nothing against the countries who are an actual threat?

What makes you think that I'm in favor of an intervention in Congo? I'm saying that unlike the Iraqis, people in Congo are begging for help and the guy in North Korea have 400k slaves and I can go on and on yet what is being done? Are they being freed?

At least I don't throw childish insults.

AbulletAwayGoneBad, you're obviously theking, or broke, or 12clicks, or one of the right wing nuts on this board. Why keep making fake names, you just look dumber and dumber every time. Saying you went into Iraq because of UN resolutions is laughable, so is saying you went their to help the people. Do you even know which resolutions they were breaking? No, you don't, or else you wouldn't open your mouth about it. Notice even Bush isn't stupid enough to use that as an excuse? Wake up you fucking tool, you're bullshit is never going to change anyone's opinion.

loryn I love you. one more reason to hate the french :winkwink:

Do you hate Jews and blacks to?

Since you ignored my comments, I will again point out how the USA went against the UN when they invaded Iraq.

How can you (And the speechwriters) now tout this as a reason for invasion? Is it simply grasping at straws to be able to pull out something?

Since when was the USA a great champion of the UN? Certainly not in recent history.

I never said the US went to war to defend the UN. And I don't think it's been said the US went to war for that. What I did say was that the reason we did invade Iraq was because they failed to follow the UN resolutions. And since those UN resolutions were there because of the US's involvement back in '91 it was only logical that the US would be the one's enforcing them. The UN wasn?t doing anything effective in enforcing them so we stepped in.

And I think once the US was a "Great Champion" of the UN. But over the years it has just turned to shit and serves no real purpose. It's a waste of money for the US. The UN is constantly talking about how important they are but fail to act on anything.

I agree with you. The UN did NOTHING when Iraq violated the resolutions. Action was necessary, and nothign was done. Re-organization and reassesment of the body is definately in order.

I also agree with you that people LOVE attacking the largest power in the world. It IS difficult to orchestrate a country's foreign policy with everyone out for your blood.

But is obvious our opinions differ on the other issues. :)

I love happy endings :D

I always thought the UN has such a great potential do the world some good. But I think it's failing miserably. I agree with you they should do some reorganizing. It just seems like most people involved with it are afraid to do anything. Right or wrong, decisions should be made. But they can't even seem to make decision. It's a shame.

I know. They can really make you enjoy hating them. I think they like it.

And as for you.................................:Graucho

Hey Hey Hey, don't put the Jews and Black in the same category as those crazy people.

We are all one big happy family, except for the French. :1orglaugh

You're some kind of a new KKK sect?

to all french hater :321GFY
im french-canadian and proud of it
so you went to war against a 3rd country world because of some not respected UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention Israel doesnt respect UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention that Israel have the nuke ?
did i forgot to mention that kill innocent people everyday ?
so what the fuck are you doing in iraq ?

Je t'aime :)

I think a lot of people are going to be surprised about what was known and not know by Bush and the boys before going into Iraq and I mean in a positive way for this administration. A lot of lefties are going to be eating crow when the campaign gets into full swing.

:2 cents:

Do you live in FRANCE????? Do you live by their laws???? NO so shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

:thumbsup

Are you one of those politically correct freaks??

Reread my statement with a smile and a little laugh. It was meant as comedy. You know like comedians on Comedy Central. You know HUMOR. I love Tough Crowd with Collin Quinn. Maybe you should watch that and light up a little. GEESH!!

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by skillfull
to all french hater
im french-canadian and proud of it
so you went to war against a 3rd country world because of some not respected UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention Israel doesnt respect UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention that Israel have the nuke ?
did i forgot to mention that kill innocent people everyday ?
so what the fuck are you doing in iraq ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Wow,

First the UN resolution under the terms and conditions of surrender by Saddam were broken every single day. The U.S. had every right to go in under those resolutions, never mind the last one that was signed on to.

Second, the UN resolution that Israel is supposedly not agreeing to after being attacked from within its country and by the outside Arab countries again has never been adhered to by the Palestinians. The agreement said that all hostilities would have to cease, so unless the attacks against Israel stop, they have the right to continue on with the occupation and are technically still at war.

Third, some people just don't get it. There is a HUGE difference between killing military type people and indiscriminantly blowing up anyone in sight. Between taking as many precautions as possible while disposing of a ruthless suicide killer and accidentally harming others and between going into the first house you find and shooting a 5 year old in the head.

Fourth, Clinton and the U.S. had to go cleanup Europes back yard in the balkans because they couldn't handle it themselves withou any U.N. resolution. No one said shit then.

Last but not least my understanding of the American Civil war and many others were started for reasons other than humane acts for an oppressed people. But I'm sure there isn't an black person in the U.S. or a sane Iraqi that is not going to be happy to be as free as one can be in this world.

P.S. Israel has nukes, fantastic. We need them in place to protect our interests. Someone has to have the big gun on the block to keep things in check. Who decides who gets Nukes? the same type of people who decide whether or not I should be able to have a grenade in my house. Does it make sense for every dumb fuck to have a grenade? Nope, I don't think so.

Thanks for wasting some time on my rant.

Just my :2 cents:

what's priceless is people like you saying "invading Iraq is not about oil" but "the frenchies? - whoah ALL ABOUT OIL".
domestic blindness at it's best.

FERME TA GUEULE PUTAIN DE FRANCAIS DE MERDE

LES FRANCAIS ADORENT LA BITE ARABE DANS LEURS CULS DE TAPETTES.

JE T'EMMERDES TOI ET TOUS LES PEDES DE FRANCAIS.

FERMES TA GROSSE GUEULE !!!

Let's bomb saddam, or is it to late?

It's ALL about money you nonces.... otherwise Saudi Arabia would be a sheet of glass. My country, your country their country. we're no better than each other. I hope Australia's new contruction and oil contracts were worth it. At least none of our soldiers died for our cut of the loot.

go take a bath frenchie.

Hey Mic;
Why don't you shut the fuck up and take your dick out of that kangaroo's ass? :321GFY

No they don't, not without approval of the security council.

Quote:

Second, the UN resolution that Israel is supposedly not agreeing to after being attacked from within its country and by the outside Arab countries again has never been adhered to by the Palestinians. The agreement said that all hostilities would have to cease, so unless the attacks against Israel stop, they have the right to continue on with the occupation and are technically still at war.

Actually there is more than one resolution they're not adhering to. Besides, it's the occupation that started the mess.

Quote:

Last but not least my understanding of the American Civil war and many others were started for reasons other than humane acts for an oppressed people. But I'm sure there isn't an black person in the U.S. or a sane Iraqi that is not going to be happy to be as free as one can be in this world.

Actually I happen to know a few Iraqis who didn't like loosing there country.

Quote:

P.S. Israel has nukes, fantastic. We need them in place to protect our interests. Someone has to have the big gun on the block to keep things in check. Who decides who gets Nukes? the same type of people who decide whether or not I should be able to have a grenade in my house. Does it make sense for every dumb fuck to have a grenade? Nope, I don't think so. Thanks for wasting some time on my rant. Just my :2 cents:

I think every country should have nukes, that way no more fucking around and invading weak countries here and there.