he saw the ingredients in your skin lotion.

you run your mouth quite a bit

Hopefully bush will be ousted in the coming election. I just hope the Dem party can produce a strong enough candidate or that the electoral numbers game works against bush.

:winkwink:

Allowed?

:1orglaugh

Absolutely. Nothing new tough....:


:2 cents:

There has been talk of Osma and Saddam working togather (especially to supply weapons to Osma), sine the first World Trade Center Bombing when Clinton was president. Rather they had been truely working togather to try and bring down the US, is unsure. But there has alwasy been speculation about it.

http://www.worldthreats.com/middle_east/iraq_terror.htm

Why Clinton didn't snuff out Osma back when the World Trade Center was first bombed, I have no idea. It would of helped prevent 9/11. At least Osma would of been on the run. Instead we had to wait for Bush, before any action was taken.

Doesn;t he look like " Colombo " in that picture....

50 Bush lies

hmm, maybe it was the fact that he had to spend 70% of his time dealing with being impeached over a fucking blowjob. The better question is, why hasn't Bush snuffed out Osama after 9/11? If Clinton was in office right now we would have invaded the right country (Saudi Arabia), and he'd be dead, case closed. Halliburton stock however, would not be doing as well. No Afghani pipeline and no Iraqi oil. So it's a tradeoff really.

Slow Day.

I cannot believe you are still pushing the same lies. Watch my lips.

HE LIED TO YOU

You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time. the king seems to be in the first group.

You see inside every little Muslim is an American trying to get out.

Try traveling around the world before you comment on anything other than what happens in your street.

Why do you assume they want to have a western style democracy?
Do you think this democracy will be theirs to choose?
Or will Americans choose it for them?
What evidence other than what Bush, a proven liar, tells you is there of a terrorist threat?
With the US's track record at "Changing the face of would be enemies" some could say it's best they stay out of there.

Saddam was a tyrant, no argument. He was aslo a big mouth. But he was more use to the West alive and killing Muslims than he is now. He screamed and shouted against the US and Israel, while he was killing ONLY Muslims. Now he is a martyr who stood up to the Western Devil.

Read my lips...you do not have a clue.

Been around the world and to hell and back...thank you very much.

I don't...Clueless.

No.

Yes.

Do you ever watch the news...cluless...or do you think the bombings/attacks that have taken place around the world for the past twenty or more years are hollywood productions?


Some can say whatever they like...but it will not change what is reality.

Yes the great "martyr"...found groveling in a hole in the ground.

Some of the fools can be fooled anytime.

You have to tell me why I'm wrong or you look an even bigger idiot. :1orglaugh

So they are finding WMDs all over the place not as this story says http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3433111.stm and top politicians are not saying they were not there. Was it Mr Powell? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/3426703.stm

Someone lied to you and you cannot see it even when shown the evidence.

Always clueless...prior to the invasion...US intel...British intel...France intel...German intel were in "consensus" agreement that Saddam possessed WMD's as stated today by David Kay during his testimony before a Senate committee...also as stated by the previous Administration of President Clinton. Intel failures of these major goverments do not equate to lying about WMD's.

The Administration could have selected anyone of multiple viable reasons for taking down Saddam...but chose to primarily use WMD's as one of the reasons...why WMD's...because they chose to believe the "consensus" of intel from our 14 intel agencies as well as those agencies from Britain...France...and Germany. They would be total fools to lie about WMD's if they knew that WMD's did not exist.

Poor...clueless old man...you shall remain so for the few remaining years you have left.

Let's all just put theking on ignore, charley, dig, etc, you guys have proved him wrong (and crazy) so many times, and he just keeps spitting out the same crap. I mean he's a right wing nutball who's actually convinced himself he's left leaning, enough said.

I can't ignore them, it's too funny watching them try to ignore shit when you're waving it in their face and calling everyone else stupid :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

and Torone, why are you calling HIM an old man when YOU'RE an old man who is not only not nearly as successful or as literate as he is, but you're still living with your mother? For fuck's sake, you got run over by a Jeep when you were in the military (if you really were), you're not even smart enough to get out of the way of a moving vehicle and you're going to tell US we have comprehension problems?

PS you're not a liberal.

I agree

DISSENT MEANS HE IS A TRAITOR. HOW DARE HE QUESTION HIS LEADER.

LOL !!!!

I love sarcasm....

vote vote vote I cant say it enough

Please do.

PS...you're not pyschic...but you are DISMISSED.

The World Trade Center was bombed in 1993. That was during Clinton's 1st term. The whole thing with Clinton and Paula Jone's claiming sexual harrasement happened in 1998. The World Trade Center bombing happened a whole 5 years before the Paula Jones lawsuit.

Just so you know. The only reason Monica Lewinsky was brought inot the whole court case, was as a witness of Clinton's character in the Paula Jones sexual harrasement case. The news just had a field day with Monica, that it overshadowed what the whole court case was about. The impeachment came about, cause he lied in court about what he did with Monica (and Paula).
http://www.texasonline.net/langley/columns/clinton.htm


Once alone in the room with the state clerical worker, Clinton dropped his drawers and said something to the effect: "Young lady, please come forward and serve your governor and our great and sovereign state."

Ummm, okay. Keep quoting shit about Clinton from a right wing Texas website. Ads so much to your credibility.

And by the way, unlike Bush Clinton actually caught the people that bombed the WTC in 93.

I'm just stating facts. I'm neither on the left or right. I could care less if Clinton is in office or Bush. The people that caused the WTC to come down during 9/11 died. No body to catch.

I'm just saying, if Clinton had did something during the first WTC bombing, we wouldn't of had 9/11. At least Bush went in after Osma.

Simply put.Bush needs to go.

Who the fuck is Osma?

I know your joking around, but I'll play along.
Osma Bin Laden
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/

bush can go fuck himself :321GFY

He is part of "The Osmas " a muslim version of " The Osmonds"...

Where have you been???

:1orglaugh

theKing:

First there is no "insinuation". It is a matter of FACT that the thing SAID on numerous occasions there IS WMD.

Second, WMD was the PRIME reason given to both the UN and the American people as the reason to go to war.

It is also a fact that despite an abundance of information to the contrary, the Admin are still claiming Iraq has WMD with Cheney trolling around Europe spouting this to the dismay of others.

King... there is no basis for saying WMD was "probably not at the top of the list of reasons". It was THE reason - that is, unless it is admitted that the Iraqi adventure was actually on the agenda before the "thing" was elected.

It's getting harder for people to defend Bush everyday. I wonder when these people will stop?

You guys are missing the point. Bush has repeatedly mentioned 9/11 when talking about Iraq. He did it when he was trying to get support for the war and he did it again yesterday to the media. He knows half the people in this country thinks the 9/11 hijackers were Iraqis and he continues to play on it.