GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   **** WTC Owner Admits to Demolition of Building 7 on 9/11!!! **** (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=223560)

erehwon 01-22-2004 04:08 AM

I suspect the party that posted this topic confuses news helicopters for black helicopters all the time.

Why did WTC 7 collapse?

Funny how these folks in the peanut gallery seem to forget who WTC 7 had as tenants at the time.

Salomon Smith Barney
1,202,900 Square Feet.
Floors 1-6,13,18-46

ITT Hartford Insurance Group
122,590 Square Feet
Floors 19-21

American Express Bank International
106,117 Square Feet
Floors 7,8,13

Securities & Exchange Commission
106,117 Square Feet
Floors 11,12,13

Standard Chartered Bank
111,398 Square Feet
Floors 10,13,26,27

Mayor's Office of Emergency Mgmt
45,815 Square Feet
Floors 23

Many of these are very large financial institutions, and many of them had their main corporate datacenters located in WTC 7. I would hope most of you on this board have toured a modern day datacenter, for you would know that if the power went out, very large diesel generators would kick in within milliseconds of the main electrical grid going offline, providing power for those servers.

WTC 7 had several diesel tanks to power the generators, over 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel throughout the building, 6,000 gallons for the NYC Office of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor, and another 36,000 throughout the building.

Now a Boeing 767 can carry over 23,500 gallons of jet fuel and its anyones guess how much was burned off between take-off and when it crashed into each of the two WTC's but it was the combination of the burning fuel and the combustable materials inside that led to the collaspe of the WTC #1 and #2, both 100+ stories tall.

Why is it unlikely that with all the explosions, collaspes, burning jet pieces into surrounding buildings can make you belive that WTC 7 was felled only by plastic explosives? and not by a raging diesel fuel fire burning out of control with all the papers, and other combustable materials inside of WTC 7.

Before you jump into another thread that its a fact that no building in the past has ever collasped from fire, those buildings had firefighters actively trying to put out those fires.

Maybe you were living in a cave with UBL on 9-11-01, but that whole WTC area was a complete disaster area, FDNY was more concerned with rescuing people and 343 fellow fire fighters then trying to put out fully enveloped 47 floor office building fire.

Next thing you're going to spew is that it wasn't a Boeing 757 that crashed into the Pentagon, but a cruise missle fired from a U.S. Navy destroyer off the coast of New Jersey.

chodadog 01-22-2004 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by erehwon
I suspect the party that posted this topic confuses news helicopters for black helicopters all the time.

Why did WTC 7 collapse?

Funny how these folks in the peanut gallery seem to forget who WTC 7 had as tenants at the time.

Salomon Smith Barney
1,202,900 Square Feet.
Floors 1-6,13,18-46

ITT Hartford Insurance Group
122,590 Square Feet
Floors 19-21

American Express Bank International
106,117 Square Feet
Floors 7,8,13

Securities & Exchange Commission
106,117 Square Feet
Floors 11,12,13

Standard Chartered Bank
111,398 Square Feet
Floors 10,13,26,27

Mayor's Office of Emergency Mgmt
45,815 Square Feet
Floors 23

Many of these are very large financial institutions, and many of them had their main corporate datacenters located in WTC 7. I would hope most of you on this board have toured a modern day datacenter, for you would know that if the power went out, very large diesel generators would kick in within milliseconds of the main electrical grid going offline, providing power for those servers.

WTC 7 had several diesel tanks to power the generators, over 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel throughout the building, 6,000 gallons for the NYC Office of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor, and another 36,000 throughout the building.

Now a Boeing 767 can carry over 23,500 gallons of jet fuel and its anyones guess how much was burned off between take-off and when it crashed into each of the two WTC's but it was the combination of the burning fuel and the combustable materials inside that led to the collaspe of the WTC #1 and #2, both 100+ stories tall.

Why is it unlikely that with all the explosions, collaspes, burning jet pieces into surrounding buildings can make you belive that WTC 7 was felled only by plastic explosives? and not by a raging diesel fuel fire burning out of control with all the papers, and other combustable materials inside of WTC 7.

Before you jump into another thread that its a fact that no building in the past has ever collasped from fire, those buildings had firefighters actively trying to put out those fires.

Maybe you were living in a cave with UBL on 9-11-01, but that whole WTC area was a complete disaster area, FDNY was more concerned with rescuing people and 343 fellow fire fighters then trying to put out fully enveloped 47 floor office building fire.

Next thing you're going to spew is that it wasn't a Boeing 757 that crashed into the Pentagon, but a cruise missle fired from a U.S. Navy destroyer off the coast of New Jersey.

Careful. He'll call you a sheep!

Great bit of info. Where'd you get it, out of curiousity. 'Cause you just know he's going to say you made it up.

Mojo 01-22-2004 08:32 AM

So the reason for the big conspiracy to secretly demolish the building was because "There were CIA offices" in it. Why weren't all CIA offices demolished on that day? The secrect, incriminating documents were only there? No one had a copy machine?

So, why didn't the secret military force just remove the forbidden documents instead of demolishing the building?

And if they demolished the building to destroy the documents, did they assume that the USA government does not have access to a Xerox machine and could have made copies?

Does the USA government have no concept of the term "remote file storage"?

Wouldn't have been easier to engineeer and cover up a simple theft of documents rather than secretly demolish a building?


Ok, do I wear my tin foil hat with the shiny side in our out?

Buff 01-22-2004 08:53 AM

My humble question as a United States Army Special Forces Engineer/Demolitions Sgt for 6 years in 20th Group Special Forces is this:

Who exactly are you crediting with killing the building (military lingo trumps civilian lingo)? Who did the target analysis (structural analysis for you douchebag pedestrians)? When were the charges placed? What type of explosives were used?

Thank you.

Buff

Honeyslut 01-22-2004 09:32 AM

Maybe the terrorist rigged the building to fall and nobody wants to admit it

erehwon 01-22-2004 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog


Careful. He'll call you a sheep!

Great bit of info. Where'd you get it, out of curiousity. 'Cause you just know he's going to say you made it up.

Heh, if you can't tell, online porn isn't the day job, yet.

So in the sprirt of open source intelligence, and debunking black helicopter theories....

WTC 7 Tenants list.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/tra.../tenants7.html

Size of diesel fuel storage tanks.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...236nov29.story

Boeing 767 Specs.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/jetliner/b767/

WTC Damage report from the city of New York
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/tra...amage.map.html

Brad Xtremepay 01-22-2004 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mpulse
Very interesting...maybe there was more than just explosives helping out!! Just released photo...

http://www.spinskin.com/wtc.jpg

Makes you wonder...:(

This is where the alien conspiracy comes in.

chodadog 01-23-2004 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by erehwon


Heh, if you can't tell, online porn isn't the day job, yet.

So in the sprirt of open source intelligence, and debunking black helicopter theories....

WTC 7 Tenants list.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/tra.../tenants7.html

Size of diesel fuel storage tanks.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...236nov29.story

Boeing 767 Specs.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/jetliner/b767/

WTC Damage report from the city of New York
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/tra...amage.map.html

Nice work. :thumbsup

Of course, CNN and the Chicago Tribune were in on it too! haha. Wonton seems strangely quiet all of a sudden.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123