100,

yasin is the hamas spiritual leader his voice can can kill people. Such scam that uses religion fan's or people that are psychically weak to go for death and to take lives of other people should be eliminated.

wrong wrong wrong

He was not traded to save anyones life. Go learn some history.

He was PAROLED LEGALLY in exchange for the PAROLE of TWO murdering isreal agents.

OJ WAS CONVICTED IN A CIVIL TRIAL . You have got to be the stupidest perso i have ever met in my entire life , if you cannot understand that what isreal is doing is MURDER.

You would have it that isreal drops another quarter ton bomb on an apartment bulding and murders innocent children in order to retaliate against ONE man. Gee your stooping rather low.


Who makes these decisions ? The media ? You ? start answering some questions.

I know the history of the case just fine. Trading murderers is not being paroled. The mossad agents ATTEMPTED a murder. They did not actually commit one.

And I never said he was traded for hostages. I asked the following:


Because that would be basically the same thing. Either way, the person did not SERVE their sentence, and they were not PAROLED!!

Yassin didnt commit a murder either. Further proving my point *thanks

You obviously dont know the case at all. Who are the "innocent people" that were saved by his release ???

Oh yes i forgot 2 murdering mossad agents. Who did yassin murder ?? Nobody.

So they both are guilty of the same thing right. They both planned murders of people.

YEs or NO

He was paroled . again go look at the case he was PAROLED clearly.

First of all, I didn't say it was ok to bomb an apartment bulding and murder innocent children. I said I DON'T CARE if they bomb a fucking murderer.

What exactly was OJ convicted of??

Nothing! He was found LIABLE FOR THE MURDER OF RON AND NICOLE! He was ordered to pay money!

He was NOT CONVICTED of murder.

I didnt say he was convicted of murder. I wont argue law with you as you dont seem capable of even stepping up to the bar let alone taking it. but he was convicted in civil court. PERIOD and your saying its ok to ignor the ruling and murder him.

You said it was ok to drop a bomb on his house and anyone around. Thats pretty much the same as saying drop a bomb on an apartment building ( and they have already done this twice resulting in the deaths of 2 innocent babies )

Ok we will start off very simple here. Easy question.

In your own words ( and in reality ) he was sentenced to life in prison, now you and isreal are changing your minds and saying now he should be executed. Who makes the decision to change the sentence without using the courts ?? Very simple question , dont stray from the topic just answer the question.

Okay lets send you to arrest yasin

I take it thats a joke, not very funny but hah hah.

Seriously though. You subpeona him and if he doesnt show up in court you try him in absentia and THEN and ONLY then can you order his arrest and execution. Once the COURTS have decided , not just some joe shmoe in mossad or the president. And not by launching missiles into heavily populated areas.

Ok. Last post from me on this subject.



No, I said it was ok with me if they dropped one in the middle of his living room, and killed him or anyone IN HIS HOME. If you are in his home, then you are not some poor innocent person.

As for the rest...

I am not going to argue this all night. I have proved you wrong on all the points I wanted to prove you wrong on, and now I am done with you.

Who is he to recive an invitation from the cart ?

I didn't say he should be executed, I said I DIDN'T FUCKING CARE IF HE WAS!!

And for the record, I can kill someone tonight without trying and convicting them, and it would be perfectly legal!

So if theres 3 babies in his home they deserve to be killed ?? Ok now i see your point, those innocent babies deserve to die because they could just as well stroll on out of the house.

So wich is it he should be executed or he shouldnt be ?

Who makes the decision ??

The courts make the decision is the answer , and if it is then you agree with me , Thank you very much :)

I think the point your missing is we both agree your just stupid and cant see it thats all :) ( i really dont blame you because after all , you are a woman and you really should be either cooking or cleaning or making me something to eat instead of trying to deal with something you cant fathom )

I dont think the guy is a great guy, he obviously preaches hate and thats bad. What i do think though , is that he should be tried before a court not tried before public opinion or the media. And i dont think anyone should ever be ordered EXECUTED without a trial.

where are you from?

All over :) but im british in heart & soul

If I may be blunt...
If there are 3 babies in that house, it would be very, very sad that they died, BUT...

If they are in that house, it means their parents are terrorists, and they are future terrorists, so I could get over the grief!

Not necessarily. Break into my house tonight, and you will find yourself with a bullet in the head, AND it won't be MURDER, as defined by the law.:winkwink:

It is a good thing to kill ones enemies. Israel needs to make every effort to kill all Hamas leaders and those that attempt to replace them.

You have changed your opinion on this stupid shit since the thread started. When you were PROVEN wrong on your stupid statements, you just kept changing the point you were arguing.

As for the rest of the crap you said, :1orglaugh

I see , so lets get this straight. Its ok to murder 3 babies to stop a man in a wheelchair from talking ? Ok you make lots of sense now.

Your condoning the murder of 3 innocent babies because of guilt by association.

So if your kids are riding on the bus and the military blows the bus apart and tells you later , HEY lady look , there was some bad guy in a wheelchair who told people to kill other people so we blew up the bus and everyone on it. Your fine with that ?

You really are the bottom of the barrel. You need some morals and ethics.

They should make sure people like you arent let into the usa anymore. Poor moral fiber , and ignorant to boot.

Try reading the thread little girl, Perhaps your nose got in page 2 without actually reading it. :)

What have i been proven wrong on ?? Nothing.

Lets see.

OJ was sentenced and you seem to think he wasnt . theres your first mistake.

Isreal ordered 2 people to murder someone ( just as yassin did ) and they exchanged the people and now you think its alright to murder him and break the law.

You think killing babies is ok ?

Hmm shall i continue . LOL

I figure i will remind you to answer this question again.

ANSWER THE QUESTION !!! :) dont avoid the topic just answer it.

A public bus is a lot different than the man's living room, but nice try anyway cock gobbler.

Im married thanks anyways ,try answering the question above you. :)

I think that such people should not be given this respect for a court.

I see then the question above is for you as well. Who makes that decision ?

yes, but a country that announce an target for its attack is different from a terror organization with out responsibility at all on the international arena.

I will answer the question. Those that are responsible for the security of the nation and the lives of the people that they are responsible for protecting. Any member of Hamas is an enemy of Israel...governments slay their enemies...as do individuals...been the case since the human animal came into being.

I guess the person aiming the bomb. As I said, if you came into my house uninvited, you would be sentenced to death immediately and legally.

Points you were proven wrong on:

1. You said it was wrong to kill a guy in a wheelchair...YOU ARE WRONG!

2. You said the guy was never convicted of anything...YOU WERE WRONG!

3. You said he served his sentence...YOU WERE WRONG! A compromise is not serving out a sentence.

All I said about OJ was "He was not convicted of murder", and I was right...or have you forgotten that "Not Guilty" thing?

Ill explain to you the reason why america works and the reason why we have courts.

Right or wrong it is an official record that can be pointed to when someone asks a question.

The palestinian children will grow up and their parent will tell them lies about this man and he will be a martyr and a hero. If he goes to court , people can say LOOK this is what he did , THIS is the family of innocent isrealis that he helped kill and so on. Without this you have un-answered questions and the wars will go on and on forever. People need to be held accountable for the things they have done , and if i was a families victim i would be offended that they wouldnt make this man see his day in court and punished for what he did and make him remember and see the families of those he helped kill.

This way he gets off easy and looks like a saint in the eyes of his followers.

The government cabinet in Israel took the decision and it is thier decision to make...

I see you have avoided answering the simple questiona nd switched topics again, but i will humour you.

#1 i never said they shouldnt kill people in wheelchairs , your a liar , quote me or shut the fuck up bitch

#2 i never stated he was never convicted of anything .] Your a liar quote me or shut the fuck up bitch

#3 he did serve his sentence as provided by the court. The COURTS freed him thus changing his sentence from life in prison. ( TRY READING THE ACTUAL FACTS YOU INGROWN TWATHAIR )

You said he was not convicted period and you also went on further to say you cant be convicted in a civil case and you can look back on page #2 for the exact quote. where you stated this. so can anyone else with one finger and a mouse.

The people who will consider him a martyr, will do so with or without a trial.

And again, executions can take place legally without a trial. If you don't believe me, then come on in my house tonight.:winkwink:

Quit spouting off about someone breaking into your house , lol im a 6'3 biker and you prob have a little girly .22 pistol

I have been shot 3 times twice with a .22 and once with a 357 in the gut and i can tell you now i would walk all over your face bullets or not :) .

Ok.. :)

No it is for the courts to decide criminal matters.

If he is a criminal arrest him try him and convict him , if not then leave him alone.

You seem to think im standing up for him , quite the contrary i think he should be executed too IF and ONLY IF he is tried and convicted. To be quite honest none of us have any personal experience with the man so all we know is what the media tells us. That is why we have courts so we know what the truth is. Not 100% jewish ordered killings.

Bull shit lol

Care to elaborate , that doesnt tell us much . :)

My answer was...whoever is aiming the bomb

You have made your point. You prefer enemies to be tried in court...others...including the US...sometimes choose to kill their enemy and by pass a court. The US has executed many al Qaeda members...and leaders...since 9/11...and some by remote control...some will be tried by military tribunal...and some will be tried by our justice system.

Question...were the two shots by .22...head shots?

I don't think you stand up for him I think that you are confused regarding who he is ..
he is not a criminal he is a spiritual leader of the hams get over it no cart for him. Now if you are trying to say that the a government level of Israel is not obliged to take such decision I can understand this but they are and they don't own anything to me or to you.

You are the one who likes examples. Breaking into my house is MY example of a legal execution without a trial.

And trust me, one of my bullets would drop you dead.

But we do agree that a .22 is a girly pistol. I doubt you would get to me through my .45, but I KNOW you wouldn't get to me through my AK47.

I hate girly guns.:1orglaugh

One of the biggest flaws in your logic is that you assume that the "palestinians" have courts.

As I recall these are people that don't necessarily have courts, they do what they want to do. Stoning is still a legitimate way of killing people to them. This is evident in their repeated random attacking and murdering of Israeli civilians going about their daily business.

Did the Israeli citizens get a trial while they were hit with deadly shrapnel on their way to work? Did they know or even suspect someone was after them?

I'd like to also point out right now:

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PALESTINE. There is no legitimate Palestinian state. Hence, there are no legitimate authorities in the West Bank and Gaza besides Israeli authorities, and the people calling themselves "palestinians" are in fact guests of Israel.

If you attack an army officer or soldier in America, that officer's job is not to arrest you and bring you in to a nice cushy courtroom where public defenders in suits defend you, his job is to take you out. How far do you think we would have gotten in any of our wars if we fought attacking enemy armies by charging with billyclubs and handcuffs?

Thanks for re-quoting me so you can point out to yourself how wrong you are. Does it look like i said not to murder him solely for that fact. ? Try reading 2 posts down from that where i elaborate and explain how it has nothing to do with the fact he is in a wheelchair , i only mentioned that because it obivously means he did not ACTIVELY participate in murders.

If you "para" quote tiny bits of anything you can make it look whatever way you want.

Nice try though. Clever how you left out the other 2 wrong facts you made as well

And also nice how you thing the decision on who to kill or who not to kill should be left up to Joe gunholder. Gee that would make the world a safer place.

Whoever has the gun makes the decisions. LOL get a grip you ignorant little girl.

His logic is simple and is about who gave to the countries in the world the permission to decide on a target with out bringing the subject the court.
This logic is pathetic and it is hard to prove here some thing opposite.

You changed your view 2 posts down because you realized you looked like an idiot.:1orglaugh

The decision of who to kill is ALWAYS left to the person holding the gun. If they make the wrong decision, the there will be consequences.

And, this ignorant little girl is done playing with you. Goodnight.

Both parties have done random attacks so your argument is very weak there.

In america if you attack a soldier and its the next day , you arent allowed to just go and kill the guy , you must arrest him and try him first. You obivously have not been in the military , At no time are you allowed to murder people who arent armed and are posing no resistance. Just as a police officer is not allowed to kill a person for being a murderer.

It doesnt matter what court you try him in . As i said they could even try him in absentia as long as he gets a trial . If he doesnt then what kind of proof do we go on ? Hearsay ?

America did not get where it is by executing men in a wheelchair, it got where it is by using LAWS to control the people and PUNISHMENTS to fit the crimes.

Not by randomly executing those they see fit.


Lets get back to the brawn of the story though for those who dont know the facts.

Isreal Ordered the MURDER/ASSASINATION of someone ina FOREIGN country. ( mush like yassin ordered the execution of 2 isreal agents )

So far we have 2 confirmed people ordering deaths. Now the difference is yassin got busted and the president of israel got nothing. ?? The mossad got nothing ??

Ok so now they swap prisoners, and years later they think . Gee we should never have let that guy go. Lets kill him. What about the 2 mossad agents who did MORE than just plan to kill someone they actually went about doing it.

Yet those men as well as the men that PLANNED that execution are as free as birds and have not done a day in jail.

I never changed my views once you just cant read properly or you missed page one and two, try reading them. go ahead it wont make you look much more foolish than you already do.

I have only ever had one point and you cant even argue that. and that is that nobody should be killed without a trial PERIOD . Thats about it, you can try making it about anything you want but thats what it boils down to. You seem to think its alright to just arbitrarily make up the laws as you go along.

This about sums up your mentality. Let whoever holds the gun kill anyone they see fit with no proof needed or judge just let them waste people at random.

Your a fucking pathetic joke for a human missy.