GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Official launch of Betterbeup.com (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=221512)

chodadog 01-15-2004 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

I'm not having files deleted like that. No way. Many times people pay up and all is good. For anyone to suggest that is just ridiculous.

Exactly.

Also, can someone answer this.

If in a 24 hour period, a host has 10 servers go down for 1 hour, that's 10 hours of downtime. The total time being monitoried is actually 240 hours. Is the percentage calculated on 24 hours (41 percent), or 240 hours (4%)?

Sly_RJ 01-15-2004 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker

Yep, but at the same time your total monitored time is reflected the same way. So 20 servers being monitored would show 20 hours total monitored time after one hour. But no matter what you are going to continue to cry like a baby aren't you?

Who's crying? I'm showing you major faults in your script, as well as several others in this thread, and you're still strutting around like your shit don't stink.

Try, just this once, not to be such an arrogant cock and lets try to think of something that will more accurately represent what's happening.

SomeCreep 01-15-2004 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker


One of my servers was down from hardware failures. I don't fudge figures for anyone. This is why I do not fear any hosts sueing me. As long as I am honest and do not change numbers I am wrapped in teflon as far as being sued is concerned.

o i c.

Perhaps you could make betterbeup a more valuable service if you could somehow state the cause of downtime.

I dont worry much about a host if someones box crashes, or if some guy gets his hosting cut off for not paying bills, but do worry if a webhost has their entire network go down.

romans 01-15-2004 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sandman!
Personally i like http://siteuptime.com/ free monitoring checks server every half an hour for free and emails you if there is a problem no need to iinstall scripts :thumbsup
The idea having plugin on the server have it's benefits:
- mysql server checking. betterbeup.com already helped some guys who had mysql problems where it crashes really often.
- bandwidth graphs which eleminate need to setup MRTG or similar on all of your dedicated servers.

Our monitoring interval is 2 minutes. Half hour delay is not for serious servers. Imagine chickentraffic be down for half hour.



and we have ICQ alerts :thumbsup

romans @ bbu devel team

Superterrorizer 01-15-2004 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker

Yep, but at the same time your total monitored time is reflected the same way. So 20 servers being monitored would show 20 hours total monitored time after one hour. But no matter what you are going to continue to cry like a baby aren't you?

Listen to you, at it again. These people are being polite, trying to explain some flaws in your script, and you're off being a cock about it.

If you're going to classify a period of time your master server is unable to hit the sites running your monitor script due to a 403 or 404 error (or any other error related to the webmaster fucking something up) as "Host downtime" you are misrepresenting the facts. If that's causing a host to lose business, you better believe you can get sued especially when most hosts can back up the fact that their server was up with MRTG graphs, server logs, server performance graphs, and dozens of other means.


Lose your fucking attitude and listen to what the people are saying, stop being so defensive and consider for a moment they're trying to offer their opinions to help make your "service" better. What use is it to anyone if it's not accurate? You seriously need to reconsider what is considered host downtime, or remove it all together. I know you thought it would be cool and everyone would worship you if you could show how shitty all the hosts are, but from what I (and many others it would seem) am seeing, it's not working.

romans 01-15-2004 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SomeCreep

o i c.

Perhaps you could make betterbeup a more valuable service if you could somehow state the cause of downtime.

I dont worry much about a host if someones box crashes, or if some guy gets his hosting cut off for not paying bills, but do worry if a webhost has their entire network go down.

We plan to implement the way to solve this, really.

romans @ bbu devel team

SL|M! 01-15-2004 09:18 PM

Nice! :thumbsup

Choker 01-15-2004 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Who's crying? I'm showing you major faults in your script, as well as several others in this thread, and you're still strutting around like your shit don't stink.

Try, just this once, not to be such an arrogant cock and lets try to think of something that will more accurately represent what's happening.

OMFG, you are the one acting like a 5 year old that can't get his way. if your site showed no downtime you would be strutting your shit saying how great it is. The solution to your problem of stopping a site from showing down if you take the site down was posted. If that's not good enough for you too fucking bad. You will shut a guys site down for non payment but you won't ftp in and delete a file? give me a fucking break.

romans 01-15-2004 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Superterrorizer

..snip..

If you're going to classify a period of time your master server is unable to hit the sites running your monitor script due to a 403 or 404 error (or any other error related to the webmaster fucking something up) as "Host downtime" you are misrepresenting the facts. If that's causing a host to lose business, you better believe you can get sued especially when most hosts can back up the fact that their server was up with MRTG graphs, server logs, server performance graphs, and dozens of other means.


Lose your fucking attitude ..
..snip..

404 is not considered as downtime.

and choker does have rights for his attitude, man.

Choker 01-15-2004 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Superterrorizer


Listen to you, at it again. These people are being polite, trying to explain some flaws in your script, and you're off being a cock about it.

If you're going to classify a period of time your master server is unable to hit the sites running your monitor script due to a 403 or 404 error (or any other error related to the webmaster fucking something up) as "Host downtime" you are misrepresenting the facts. If that's causing a host to lose business, you better believe you can get sued especially when most hosts can back up the fact that their server was up with MRTG graphs, server logs, server performance graphs, and dozens of other means.


Lose your fucking attitude and listen to what the people are saying, stop being so defensive and consider for a moment they're trying to offer their opinions to help make your "service" better. What use is it to anyone if it's not accurate? You seriously need to reconsider what is considered host downtime, or remove it all together. I know you thought it would be cool and everyone would worship you if you could show how shitty all the hosts are, but from what I (and many others it would seem) am seeing, it's not working.

LOL, whatever. Worship me? LOL, I really don't care if anyone uses this service or not. Defensive? Phatservers has done nothing but attack this service. When the solution to their problem was presented, they made a excuse for not using it and continue to whine and whine and whine.

Moose 01-15-2004 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker


LOL, whatever. Worship me? LOL, I really don't care if anyone uses this service or not. Defensive? Phatservers has done nothing but attack this service. When the solution to their problem was presented, they made a excuse for not using it and continue to whine and whine and whine.

No one is whining cocker. We are just pointing out to webmasters there is a flaw in your system and we have not been down for 36 hours. Yes we do have the right to defend ourselves.
And if you dont think we havnt been contacted by our customers over this...your wrong.



Oh..and 50 more hours of downtime.

Choker 01-15-2004 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog


Exactly.

Also, can someone answer this.

If in a 24 hour period, a host has 10 servers go down for 1 hour, that's 10 hours of downtime. The total time being monitoried is actually 240 hours. Is the percentage calculated on 24 hours (41 percent), or 240 hours (4%)?

240 hours

Choker 01-15-2004 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moose


No one is whining cocker. We are just pointing out to webmasters there is a flaw in your system and we have not been down for 36 hours. Yes we do have the right to defend ourselves.
And if you dont think we havnt been contacted by our customers over this...your wrong.
Oh..and 50 more hours of downtime.

You have not been down yet you stated before you took his site down? WTF man, get your story straight. If you take a site down for non-payment, delete the plugin and no time is counted against you. Simple solution yet you can't do this one simple thing?

Moose 01-15-2004 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker


You have not been down yet you stated before you took his site down? WTF man, get your story straight. If you take a site down for non-payment, delete the plugin and no time is counted against you. Simple solution yet you can't do this one simple thing?


Do I need to slow down for you?


the 36 hours I am refering to is the 36 hours that is listed on your site that we have not been down.

4Pics 01-15-2004 09:53 PM

Here's a solution Choker, since Phatservers seems to not like your system, why not have them provide the class c ips they have then ban them from using your service.

By them I mean clients of Phatservers.

grumpy 01-15-2004 09:56 PM

few sugestion for choker.
First : say your script monitors sites and not servers. If script is removed then server / host is stil up.

second : doenst matter how many machines you run..if they all go down 1 hour, then downtime is one hour. Example..the whole internet goes down for 1 hour...that means there is no internet for one hour and not one hour times the servers connectd ...just my

:2 cents:

Moose 01-15-2004 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics
Here's a solution Choker, since Phatservers seems to not like your system, why not have them provide the class c ips they have then ban them from using your service.

By them I mean clients of Phatservers.

4pics
I like the service. What I dont like is it showing 36 hours of downtime for a customer who did not pay his bills and having my sales staff have to explain this more than once to customers or potentials.

Now if these things can be worked out and shown accuratly I am all for it...I think it is a good thig cause there is alot of shit hosts ripping people off daily around here.

grumpy 01-15-2004 09:58 PM

other sugestion. If a script is installed shouldnt you not only get the info from the script but als ping the machine. If ping is oke...site is down but server is up.

Choker 01-15-2004 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics
Here's a solution Choker, since Phatservers seems to not like your system, why not have them provide the class c ips they have then ban them from using your service.

By them I mean clients of Phatservers.

Nah, there are 120 guys using this service right now to monitor their sites. This is the main purpose of this script. The table showing all the hosts uptime and downtime is more of a afterthought than anything. I have yet to get one complaint from anyone other than hosts. I think I will reset the hosts total downtime since in all fairness until the 13th if someone deleted the plugin it would report the site as down.

4Pics 01-15-2004 10:01 PM

What's to stop someone from getting a cheap virtual account at Isprime, Phatservers, and writing another script to purposely make them look bad. All the while having an account elsewhere that is up all the time?

I think the service should just provide the data to webmaster, and maybe after its been running a few months then maybe show your Choker Top 5 hosts based on certain data you gathered.

Moose, I was not meaning anything bad about your hosting, but you guys seem to be the only host complaining, and to a degree you have a right cause you really weren't down 40 real hrs.

Choker 01-15-2004 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by grumpy
few sugestion for choker.
First : say your script monitors sites and not servers. If script is removed then server / host is stil up.

second : doenst matter how many machines you run..if they all go down 1 hour, then downtime is one hour. Example..the whole internet goes down for 1 hour...that means there is no internet for one hour and not one hour times the servers connectd ...just my

:2 cents:

But then the math does not add up as we show total time of each site monitored

Turboface 01-15-2004 10:03 PM

Sweet! I was just gonna make a post the other night about services like this.

:thumbsup

grumpy 01-15-2004 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker


But then the math does not add up as we show total time of each site monitored

thats solved when you monitor sites. It would be correct if it said that site xxx was down one hour and site xyz.
both sites have been down one hour. Total downtime on the sites is two hours. Total downtime on the server is one hour.

chodadog 01-15-2004 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker


You have not been down yet you stated before you took his site down? WTF man, get your story straight. If you take a site down for non-payment, delete the plugin and no time is counted against you. Simple solution yet you can't do this one simple thing?

Uhm, so, if the client does then pay his bill, late, he should come back to an empty server? Yeah. That'll go down real well.

:1orglaugh

Choker 01-15-2004 10:11 PM

http://www.betterbeup.com/

There, every host has a clean slate now. I will NEVER EVER do this again. Only because until the 13th if the plugin was deleted the site was considered down.

umm, give it a few minutes to reset all hosts to 0. Cache thingy

grumpy 01-15-2004 10:13 PM

http://www.thehun.com.br/ the hun will like this one in that list ...:winkwink:

sixxxth_sense 01-15-2004 10:14 PM

CHOKER SOMEONE STOLE YOUR DESIGN! ! !
fucked asshole lets kill'm


j/k


great service!!!

Choker 01-15-2004 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog


Uhm, so, if the client does then pay his bill, late, he should come back to an empty server? Yeah. That'll go down real well.

:1orglaugh

The host only has to delete the plugin, not his site

NedFLanders 01-15-2004 10:16 PM

Good luck man :thumbsup

RockDaddy 01-15-2004 10:18 PM

I agree, this is borderline false advertising and potentially damaging to a companies business.

It is NOT monitoring the hosting company it is monitoring individual sites and already I don't want to do business with a couple of hosting companies on there based on this report. Even though I know it COULD be something else, I don't KNOW that it IS something else.

What if someone has their own unmanaged box and fucks their own stuff up? Bad report on the HOSTING company.

What if someone doesn't pay their bill and rather than just rushing in and deleting everything on their site (as suggested) they want to give the customer an opportunity to pay and not lose everything.

There HAS to be some liability issues here somewhere.

RockDaddy 01-15-2004 10:20 PM

Quote:

The host only has to delete the plugin, not his site
This post was made while I was typing above.
How does the hosting company know what you are running on your own boxes or even 400+ of their own?

romans 01-15-2004 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Choker
http://www.betterbeup.com/

There, every host has a clean slate now. I will NEVER EVER do this again. Only because until the 13th if the plugin was deleted the site was considered down.

umm, give it a few minutes to reset all hosts to 0. Cache thingy

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha=
YES, it's total reset. All downtimes and uptimes and stats are zeroed.

From now on you DON'T have to delete plugnis. 404 is NOT causing downtime.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha=

Choker 01-15-2004 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RockDaddy
I agree, this is borderline false advertising and potentially damaging to a companies business.

It is NOT monitoring the hosting company it is monitoring individual sites and already I don't want to do business with a couple of hosting companies on there based on this report. Even though I know it COULD be something else, I don't KNOW that it IS something else.

What if someone has their own unmanaged box and fucks their own stuff up? Bad report on the HOSTING company.

What if someone doesn't pay their bill and rather than just rushing in and deleting everything on their site (as suggested) they want to give the customer an opportunity to pay and not lose everything.

There HAS to be some liability issues here somewhere.

Nope. No liability here. I am reporting the truth. Nothing more nothing less. If someone wishes to sue me because this program reported the truth then so be it. The "truth" is as it is posted on the site..........

Warning
The above table represents only the servers that have installed our plugin and that this service is actively monitoring. This service DOES NOT take into account server downtime due to DNS problems, sites shut down by the host, acts of God, etc. If the monitored site does not respond for ANY reason BBU will consider this site down and count this downtime up to 24 hours against the hosts total downtime. We do not guarantee the accuracy of this page, nor do we represent any of the hosting companies being monitored


There is no simple solution for al lthe scenerios everyone brought up.

chodadog 01-16-2004 01:21 AM

Yes there is. Provide the service for individuals like every other monitoring program. Don't publically display the downtime information, 'cause more often than not, it's going to be inaccurate.

Superterrorizer 01-16-2004 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
Yes there is. Provide the service for individuals like every other monitoring program. Don't publically display the downtime information, 'cause more often than not, it's going to be inaccurate.
What he said.
:thumbsup

<IMX> 01-16-2004 01:33 AM

That would be too rational
Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
Yes there is. Provide the service for individuals like every other monitoring program. Don't publically display the downtime information, 'cause more often than not, it's going to be inaccurate.

50 Cent 01-16-2004 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Choker I have no problem with you. In fact, I even like you. It's your script I don't like. It's missing some logic in it. That missed logic is hurting me and my business. Why shouldn't I be pissed off?

Those 36 hours that we're credited with are from some guy who didn't pay his bills. Yes Choker, when someone doesn't pay their bills, we cut them off whether they're running your downtime script or not. Now because we're running our business properly, we get "check marks" from you.

I now have pissed off clients and questionable potential clients because of your "helpful" site. You're damaging my business because of false information represented by you.



I can see how this can hurt your reputation sly, I would sue for incorrect infomation.

--

Here's a scenario for you: say I buy some traffic from you, straight United States traffic (this is hypothetical, I don't know your regional restrictions.) Traffic starts coming to my galleries and I notice some Chinese traffic coming in to (some Chinese site took my gallery and I didn't notice it) my gallery. Now I'm pissed off because I think you're sending me Chinese traffic. I build a quick site to rate the various traffic brokers I buy from. Right next to your link I put a big fat notice "SENDS CHINESE TRAFFIC". I proceed to show all my friends. You lose business and current clients.

How happy would you be?


50 Cent 01-16-2004 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moose


No one is whining cocker. We are just pointing out to webmasters there is a flaw in your system and we have not been down for 36 hours. Yes we do have the right to defend ourselves.
And if you dont think we havnt been contacted by our customers over this...your wrong.



Oh..and 50 more hours of downtime.

Moose why not firewall his ips so he can't run his scripts. I agree with you 100% this script has major flows in it and can damage reputation. Just my :2 cents:

50 Cent 01-16-2004 02:05 AM

Moose and another thing, he is displaying Phatservers name on his website, which without your consent he can not do.

If a webmaster wants to monitor his sites with a script that's fine let the webmaster display uptime of his/her domain.

I smell whole bunch of lawsuites comming

:Graucho

RockDaddy 01-16-2004 07:24 AM

Ok, I didn't sit up all night thinking about this, but this just came to me.

List the SITES name that is being monitored ALONG with the hosting companies name. That way if ALL the sites hosted by one company were showing downtime, you could be pretty sure it was a hosting issue and not the owner of imadufas.com messing with his dns settings again.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123