Microsoft could fight Acacia? - GoFuckYourself.com

Jimbo · 10-31-2003, 12:12 AM

http://zdnet.com.com/2102-1104_2-5050986.html

If I buy windows and use windows media server with .wmv files. Does that mean I can get Microsoft to fight Acacia?

pussyluver · 10-31-2003, 12:15 AM

Sure seems logical to me, but I'm not an attorney. What about Real Player, MP3 and the rest?

MS could solve all this by buying Acacia - chump change to ole Bill.

F

StuartD · 10-31-2003, 12:17 AM

I don't think M$ even knows Acacia exists yet.... and if they do, I'm sure they're not overly worried, yet.

Giorgio_Xo · 10-31-2003, 12:18 AM

In Federal Court that is called a counter claim. The only major issue with that route is that you are counter suing Microsoft for defensive help from Acacia means that you are recognizing that Acacia's patent is valid and that Microsoft's software cause you to violate the patent.

We aren't at that stage. Acacia is against the ropes. There is no real reason to admit Acacia's patent is valid. It isn't.

I would highly recommend suing Acacia in small claims court for unfair business practises. This will cause Acacia to waste need resources and usually only cost $22 to file.

Stud Money · 10-31-2003, 12:19 AM

Think about it this way...

Acacia had a decision to make after they started to receive funds from the mainstream mom + pop businesses.

This decision was as follows.

1) Go after the likes of AOL / Microsoft.
2) Go after the (what they saw as) 'Seedy' Adult Industry.

Choice one could have potentially given them a LOT of major grief if they went for the throats of AOL / Microsoft as, they would have most likely been taken to court and lost a LOT of money.

Choice two, which they chose, they were hoping that because we work in the adult industry we would fold and not pull together as we have done, ultimately, it would have been a wiser business move on their part to go for AOL / Microsoft.

AOL / Microsoft in all likelyhood would have negotiated a settlement deal, it would have taken a while but they would have settled.

They chose adult.

If they had even done any 'prior' research on the adult industry they would have seen how we stick together when something threatens our livelyhoods. It happened a few years ago by all accounts when some company thought they had a valid patent on e-commerce transactions, needless to say, that company is no longer around

LiveDose · 10-31-2003, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
I would highly recommend suing Acacia in small claims court for unfair business practises. This will cause Acacia to waste need resources and usually only cost $22 to file.

My thoughts exactly.

pussyluver · 10-31-2003, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
In Federal Court that is called a counter claim. The only major issue with that route is that you are counter suing Microsoft for defensive help from Acacia means that you are recognizing that Acacia's patent is valid and that Microsoft's software cause you to violate the patent.

We aren't at that stage. Acacia is against the ropes. There is no real reason to admit Acacia's patent is valid. It isn't.

I would highly recommend suing Acacia in small claims court for unfair business practises. This will cause Acacia to waste need resources and usually only cost $22 to file.

Like the way you think. Do it. No balls here on this one. Plus I'd have to really hit the books or hire an attorney to fight it even in small claims.

pussyluver · 10-31-2003, 12:34 AM

well, I'm forced into talking to an attorney anyway on the subject. Wonder if I could get attorney fees out of 'em if I won that small claims battle???

Bladewire · 10-31-2003, 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
I don't think M$ even knows Acacia exists yet.... and if they do, I'm sure they're not overly worried, yet.

h

Microsoft knows Acacia exists and who do you think Microsoft is going to support in the Homegrown case.. Acacia?

We will win.

You might want to bookmark this post

Bladewire · 10-31-2003, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo
In Federal Court that is called a counter claim. The only major issue with that route is that you are counter suing Microsoft for defensive help from Acacia means that you are recognizing that Acacia's patent is valid and that Microsoft's software cause you to violate the patent.

We aren't at that stage. Acacia is against the ropes. There is no real reason to admit Acacia's patent is valid. It isn't.

I would highly recommend suing Acacia in small claims court for unfair business practises. This will cause Acacia to waste need resources and usually only cost $22 to file.

Great Idea!

Bladewire · 10-31-2003, 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Stud Money
Think about it this way...

Acacia had a decision to make after they started to receive funds from the mainstream mom + pop businesses.

This decision was as follows.

1) Go after the likes of AOL / Microsoft.
2) Go after the (what they saw as) 'Seedy' Adult Industry.

Choice one could have potentially given them a LOT of major grief if they went for the throats of AOL / Microsoft as, they would have most likely been taken to court and lost a LOT of money.

Choice two, which they chose, they were hoping that because we work in the adult industry we would fold and not pull together as we have done, ultimately, it would have been a wiser business move on their part to go for AOL / Microsoft.

AOL / Microsoft in all likelyhood would have negotiated a settlement deal, it would have taken a while but they would have settled.

They chose adult.

If they had even done any 'prior' research on the adult industry they would have seen how we stick together when something threatens our livelyhoods. It happened a few years ago by all accounts when some company thought they had a valid patent on e-commerce transactions, needless to say, that company is no longer around

StudMoney ICQ me 265912752 if I'm not there send a message so I know your number.

IntenseCash · 10-31-2003, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
I don't think M$ even knows Acacia exists yet.... and if they do, I'm sure they're not overly worried, yet.

Acacia has been around for a couple of years, I am sure Microsoft knows about them... they will just wait it out until Acacia asks them to pay for the licence... it may be a while

JDog · 10-31-2003, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jimbo
http://zdnet.com.com/2102-1104_2-5050986.html

If I buy windows and use windows media server with .wmv files. Does that mean I can get Microsoft to fight Acacia?

But it is up to Acacia who they want to sue with patent infringement. So I doubt they want to sue Microsoft!

jDoG

Mr.Fiction · 10-31-2003, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Squirtit
h

Microsoft knows Acacia exists and who do you think Microsoft is going to support in the Homegrown case.. Acacia?

We will win.

You might want to bookmark this post

10-31-2003, 12:12 AM	#1
Jimbo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Montreal Posts: 3,989	Microsoft could fight Acacia? http://zdnet.com.com/2102-1104_2-5050986.html If I buy windows and use windows media server with .wmv files. Does that mean I can get Microsoft to fight Acacia? __________________ free sex videos

10-31-2003, 12:17 AM	#3
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	I don't think M$ even knows Acacia exists yet.... and if they do, I'm sure they're not overly worried, yet. __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

10-31-2003, 12:18 AM	#4
Giorgio_Xo Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 4,263	In Federal Court that is called a counter claim. The only major issue with that route is that you are counter suing Microsoft for defensive help from Acacia means that you are recognizing that Acacia's patent is valid and that Microsoft's software cause you to violate the patent. We aren't at that stage. Acacia is against the ropes. There is no real reason to admit Acacia's patent is valid. It isn't. I would highly recommend suing Acacia in small claims court for unfair business practises. This will cause Acacia to waste need resources and usually only cost $22 to file. __________________ Make Levees, Not War Last edited by Giorgio_Xo; 10-31-2003 at 12:22 AM..

10-31-2003, 12:15 AM	#2
pussyluver Clueless OleMan Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ICQ - 169903487 Posts: 11,009	Sure seems logical to me, but I'm not an attorney. What about Real Player, MP3 and the rest? MS could solve all this by buying Acacia - chump change to ole Bill. F

10-31-2003, 12:19 AM	#5
Stud Money So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Somewhere between my monitor and my chair Posts: 3,214	Think about it this way... Acacia had a decision to make after they started to receive funds from the mainstream mom + pop businesses. This decision was as follows. 1) Go after the likes of AOL / Microsoft. 2) Go after the (what they saw as) 'Seedy' Adult Industry. Choice one could have potentially given them a LOT of major grief if they went for the throats of AOL / Microsoft as, they would have most likely been taken to court and lost a LOT of money. Choice two, which they chose, they were hoping that because we work in the adult industry we would fold and not pull together as we have done, ultimately, it would have been a wiser business move on their part to go for AOL / Microsoft. AOL / Microsoft in all likelyhood would have negotiated a settlement deal, it would have taken a while but they would have settled. They chose adult. If they had even done any 'prior' research on the adult industry they would have seen how we stick together when something threatens our livelyhoods. It happened a few years ago by all accounts when some company thought they had a valid patent on e-commerce transactions, needless to say, that company is no longer around

10-31-2003, 12:34 AM	#8
pussyluver Clueless OleMan Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: ICQ - 169903487 Posts: 11,009	well, I'm forced into talking to an attorney anyway on the subject. Wonder if I could get attorney fees out of 'em if I won that small claims battle???