|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| View Poll Results: Is wireless Internet a viable soltuion? | |||
| No, it's too slow and insecure |
|
2 | 15.38% |
| No, telcos will eventually cover everyone |
|
0 | 0% |
| Yes, it can be secured and it's fast |
|
10 | 76.92% |
| Yes, sat access is too damn slow for rural users |
|
1 | 7.69% |
| Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
|
Will wireless Internet take off?
Due to my recent install of a really fast 802.11b network, that is cheaper than DSL- Cable, I am forced to wonder:
Will 802.11b be a viable solution for a new rush of high speed customers? This poll is meant to draw out both sides, those that are new to the idea, and those that are not. Another poll will come to try to understand even more about how much is known about this promising technology. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,421
|
no probably not... too expensive
__________________
IntenseCash.com ~ Chuck | ICQ: 444887112 Top converting sites: BrokeStraightBoys.com, CollegeDudes.com & CollegeBoyPhysicals.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
If u touch it, I will cum
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: long island
Posts: 22,923
|
nothing will ever beat the security of a wired network
maybe |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: CZ, EU
Posts: 1,363
|
actually it already takes off in my country.... adsl is expensive and of poor quality over here, so there are many good 802.11b isp's
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,720
|
Oh, I thought you mean cell phone internet. So I voted no.
We have wireless home network, it works fine. Or you mean broadcasting signals, like sateliate stuff? That I don't know.
__________________
<a href="http://click.dtiserv2.com/Click/1125-99-us979" target="_blank">DTI cash: Top Asian Sponsor, $75 to new affiliates</a><br> <br> ICQ: 274731765 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
|
Maybe not, I paid $320 a month for unlimited ISDN from verizon.
I now pay $29 a month, only $250 for an install. That was of course to absolutely ensure that I was getting a very strong signal from very far away. I could have went for a $100 install. Not gonna burst the bubble yet on how far I am from my 'tower'. I can tell you that my cellphone sucks, but my wireless on it's 'free' spectrum, has not failed once. And yes, even during rainstorms, my sat tv failed, but 802.11b kept going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Back in the harbor
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11,482
|
i think it will definitely take over
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
|
I'm talking good ol' non 3G cell phone internet.
Seems a few already have a wirleess network already. As far as security, I have yet to see many cracks in a good IPSEC network. Couple that with a good Cisco VPN, or even a microsoft win2k VPN solution, and how could it not be as good as wired security? IMHO hiding wires doesn't increase security, it's the same idea as obscurity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,086
|
20 years from now, everything will be wireless.
|
|
|
|