I thought Acacia owned digital audio downloads? - GoFuckYourself.com

Ludedude · 10-14-2003, 02:33 PM

Heh apparently patents are not mutually exclusive

Microsoft sued for digital audio downloads

http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5090679.html

iroc409 · 10-14-2003, 02:38 PM

pathetic.

Quote:

"We'll likely take action to protect our past rights in the United States in a not-too-distant future," Angowitz said.

FightThisPatent · 10-14-2003, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ludedude
Heh apparently patents are not mutually exclusive

Microsoft sued for digital audio downloads

http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5090679.html

Besides Acacia, there is SightSound suing CDNOW/BMG over the paid downloades of digital audio/video, and USA Video suing Movielink.com for downloads of video faster than real time.

Burst.com has a patent earlier than everyone, and could be the next Acacia.. they are currently targeting Microsoft.

Another player into this mix is E-Data.... i was going to post about them, but decided this is all too much... we should just focus on one battle at a time against this war on business and patent abuse.

Fight the Patent!

crockett · 10-14-2003, 02:39 PM

man the patent office needs to get it's act together... IMO you shouldn't beable to patent an Idea... if you can't build it.. then you shouldn't beable to own a patent for it. This would be a direct way to stop all this BS patent abuse.

pretty soon someone will own the patent for thinking.

Scootermuze · 10-14-2003, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett
man the patent office needs to get it's act together... IMO you shouldn't beable to patent an Idea... if you can't build it.. then you shouldn't beable to own a patent for it. This would be a direct way to stop all this BS patent abuse.

pretty soon someone will own the patent for thinking.

Patents are supposed to be for the purpose of protecting inventors, yet these inventors can turn around and sell their patent to any Joe Schmuck that wants to pay the price.. So now Joe Schmuch can claim patent rights to an invention that he had nothing to do with..
The patent then becomes a business tool and defeats the purpose of a patent..
Patent law definitely need to be changed..

FightThisPatent · 10-14-2003, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scootermuze

The patent then becomes a business tool and defeats the purpose of a patent..
Patent law definitely need to be changed..

Here is an article for you that addresses your point:
http://www.fighthepatent.com/v2/MakingMoney.html

Fight the Patent!

10-14-2003, 02:33 PM	#1
Ludedude Suck it! Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Who wants to know? Posts: 4,432	I thought Acacia owned digital audio downloads? Heh apparently patents are not mutually exclusive Microsoft sued for digital audio downloads http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5090679.html __________________

10-14-2003, 02:39 PM	#4
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	man the patent office needs to get it's act together... IMO you shouldn't beable to patent an Idea... if you can't build it.. then you shouldn't beable to own a patent for it. This would be a direct way to stop all this BS patent abuse. pretty soon someone will own the patent for thinking. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.