Fucked up spam - GoFuckYourself.com

malakajoe · 10-02-2003, 07:16 PM

Anyone else get this fucked up spam about "artistic nudes of children". They state if you are against taking nude pictures of children, you ARE a pedophile. Fuckin assholes like this need to die a painful death.

--------------------------------------------------------
Hi,

Would you be interested in shooing artisic nudes of preteen girls? This would go a long way towards fighting pedophilia.

Artists have portrayed nude children for thousands of years. If you go into medieval churches, you'll see paintings of nude children on the walls. Renaissance painters used nude children called "putti" as a form of background decoration. Nude child photography has been a seriouys genre of art since the invention of photography. It was popular in the 19th Century, since it was, by definition, innocent. Lewis Carroll, who wrote "Alice in Wonderland" did nude child photography. Many famous photographers have done child nudes including Sally Mann, Jock Sturges, David Hamilton, Edward Weston, Richard West, Ron Oliver, etc. Brooke Shields modeled nude when she was 10 years old.

Of course, you already know this, if you're an artist with any familiarity with figure studies. I represent child models available for nude modeling. Let me know if you're interested in hiring them. Of course, they would be accompanied by their parents at all times. They will not do anything inappropriate for their age.

It's actually common for children to model nude. For kids, you're supposed to do what's called "cutsey nudes" which are all smiles and dipples.

Nude child photography is all about innocence. These are beautiful adorable images capturing fleeting childhood innocence. These are heart-warming images that elicit "awww!"

Anyone against nude child photography is a pedophile. If they are against it, that means they must attach some sexual connotation to nude child children, which means they are a pedophile. Being against nude child photography is a form of pedophilia, and we have to fight all forms of pedophilia. My only reason for being involved in this subject is to fight pedophilia. Anyone against nude child photography is a pedophile, so to fight pedophilia, you have to promote nude child photography. Anyone who cares about children should do everything they can to fight pedophilia. If you admit there's nothing sexual about it, then why would you be against it? If you admit that you do think there's something sexual about it, you're admitting you're a pedophile. If I suspect you're a pedophile, I'll immediately notify the police. I work with law enforcement to track down and capture pedophiles on the Internet.

I don't have to tell you that it's completely legal to photograph children nude. I have never been more baffled then when I've encountered retards you say it is "illegal" to photograph children nude. It is as inexplicably bizarre as if someone thought it was "illegal" to photograph a child wearing a hat. Where the hell would they get that idea from? You can't just explain it by saying they are retarded because if you saw a retard who actually thought it was illegal to photograph a child wearing a hat, you would still wonder where the hell the retard got that idea from.

Here you can learn more about this subject.

http://www.children-in-art.com

This is a different subject, but here is a website of nudes of adults.

http://www.simplenudes.com

Sarah

--------------------------------------------------

Brad-Wishing · 10-02-2003, 07:19 PM

God ... this needs to be taken to that organazation... IMPAI

10-02-2003, 07:16 PM	#1
malakajoe Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Sacramento Posts: 1,751	Fucked up spam Anyone else get this fucked up spam about "artistic nudes of children". They state if you are against taking nude pictures of children, you ARE a pedophile. Fuckin assholes like this need to die a painful death. -------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Would you be interested in shooing artisic nudes of preteen girls? This would go a long way towards fighting pedophilia. Artists have portrayed nude children for thousands of years. If you go into medieval churches, you'll see paintings of nude children on the walls. Renaissance painters used nude children called "putti" as a form of background decoration. Nude child photography has been a seriouys genre of art since the invention of photography. It was popular in the 19th Century, since it was, by definition, innocent. Lewis Carroll, who wrote "Alice in Wonderland" did nude child photography. Many famous photographers have done child nudes including Sally Mann, Jock Sturges, David Hamilton, Edward Weston, Richard West, Ron Oliver, etc. Brooke Shields modeled nude when she was 10 years old. Of course, you already know this, if you're an artist with any familiarity with figure studies. I represent child models available for nude modeling. Let me know if you're interested in hiring them. Of course, they would be accompanied by their parents at all times. They will not do anything inappropriate for their age. It's actually common for children to model nude. For kids, you're supposed to do what's called "cutsey nudes" which are all smiles and dipples. Nude child photography is all about innocence. These are beautiful adorable images capturing fleeting childhood innocence. These are heart-warming images that elicit "awww!" Anyone against nude child photography is a pedophile. If they are against it, that means they must attach some sexual connotation to nude child children, which means they are a pedophile. Being against nude child photography is a form of pedophilia, and we have to fight all forms of pedophilia. My only reason for being involved in this subject is to fight pedophilia. Anyone against nude child photography is a pedophile, so to fight pedophilia, you have to promote nude child photography. Anyone who cares about children should do everything they can to fight pedophilia. If you admit there's nothing sexual about it, then why would you be against it? If you admit that you do think there's something sexual about it, you're admitting you're a pedophile. If I suspect you're a pedophile, I'll immediately notify the police. I work with law enforcement to track down and capture pedophiles on the Internet. I don't have to tell you that it's completely legal to photograph children nude. I have never been more baffled then when I've encountered retards you say it is "illegal" to photograph children nude. It is as inexplicably bizarre as if someone thought it was "illegal" to photograph a child wearing a hat. Where the hell would they get that idea from? You can't just explain it by saying they are retarded because if you saw a retard who actually thought it was illegal to photograph a child wearing a hat, you would still wonder where the hell the retard got that idea from. Here you can learn more about this subject. http://www.children-in-art.com This is a different subject, but here is a website of nudes of adults. http://www.simplenudes.com Sarah -------------------------------------------------- __________________ Selfpleasure.com for sale on auction. Closes on Tuesday March 11th at 9pm PST!!!! Dirty enough to be good, but clean enough for everyone! ------------------------------------------------------------------ Moral Police - First graduating class coming soon! - Forcing our values across the internet

10-02-2003, 07:19 PM	#2
Brad-Wishing Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 2,415	God ... this needs to be taken to that organazation... IMPAI __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.