This is for Republican adult webmasters - GoFuckYourself.com

uranidiot · 10-03-2003, 07:31 AM

How are your plans for moving to mainstream coming along?

How will your life look without the income you've grown accumstomed to?

You keep voting right-wing.

That's your choice.

But when the rug gets pulled out from under the porn industry, make sure you're ready.

You're attacking your own livelihood, so make sure you're ready for the coming change.

With term number two the attack on porn will come full force.

Why shouldn't it? it's not as if they would have anything to lose.

And you're sinners anyway so you opinion doesn't count.

That's just the way it goes.

Sharky · 10-03-2003, 07:32 AM

wow.

u r an idiot

PerfectionGirls · 10-03-2003, 07:33 AM

Quote:

u r an idiot

hehehe! Thanks Sharky! Beat me to it

rooster · 10-03-2003, 07:43 AM

i focus on softcore. So to be honest, I wouldnt even care if there was a huge crackdown. I think there is some companies that deserve it.

I think from a logical point of view, changes will be coming. A kid cant walk into a stripclub or adult bookstore without an id, but they can go to a website and see tons of hardcore porn?

Also, I dont think its good to pick a president on the sole basis of who has a softer stance on porn.

doober · 10-03-2003, 07:46 AM

what about arnie?

iroc409 · 10-03-2003, 07:47 AM

all your tgps are belong to bush.

lexr · 10-03-2003, 10:42 AM

"Republican Adult Webmaster" is like an oxymoron really. I mean, Republican ideologists believe you're worse than drug dealers and murderers and would rather lock you away for life just for peddling porn. If you don't believe me, look to the man who replaced Janet Reno and see if I'm wrong. ;)

Anyone who's on GFY and still a Republican should reconsider their political affiliations and ponder as to whether or not their undying loyalty to the party is appreciated by those in power.

uranidiot · 10-03-2003, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PerfectionGirls

hehehe! Thanks Sharky! Beat me to it

I'll bookmark this thread for when you come to this board crying about the latest anti-porn laws.

uranidiot · 10-03-2003, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lexr
"Republican Adult Webmaster" is like an oxymoron really. I mean, Republican ideologists believe you're worse than drug dealers and murderers and would rather lock you away for life just for peddling porn. If you don't believe me, look to the man who replaced Janet Reno and see if I'm wrong. ;)

Anyone who's on GFY and still a Republican should reconsider their political affiliations and ponder as to whether or not their undying loyalty to the party is appreciated by those in power.

There's no explaining it to some people.

Some people are just too dumb.

This thread should be a magnet for them, so you can see who's sites not to promote, since they won't be around much longer.

jas1552 · 10-03-2003, 10:58 AM

Clinton signed Copa. I guess that would make Democrat adult webmasters a bunch of dumbass idiots huh?

uranidiot · 10-03-2003, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jas1552
Clinton signed Copa. I guess that would make Democrat adult webmasters a bunch of dumbass idiots huh?

Please elaborate.

jas1552 · 10-03-2003, 11:13 AM

Copa (had it not been ruled unconstitutional) would have required sexually explicit material on the internet to be behind an electronic age barrier. With punishment for non compliance being huge fines and jail time. In other words no more galleries or freesites. AVS only or jail. So using your logic anyone who makes galleries or freesites or puts any porn on the internet other than behind an AVS and votes democrat (or at the very least supported Clinton) is a dumbass idiot.

Edit: where I say "AVS" I should have said "AVS or paysite"

Rich · 10-03-2003, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jas1552
Copa (had it not been ruled unconstitutional) would have required sexually explicit material on the internet to be behind an electronic age barrier. With punishment for non compliance being huge fines and jail time. In other words no more galleries or freesites. AVS only or jail. So using your logic anyone who makes galleries or freesites or puts any porn on the internet other than behind an AVS and votes democrat (or at the very least supported Clinton) is a dumbass idiot.

Edit: where I say "AVS" I should have said "AVS or paysite"

That's a hell of a lot better than what's coming from Bush.

jas1552 · 10-03-2003, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich

That's a hell of a lot better than what's coming from Bush.

"May hap it is may hap it ain't"

PerfectionGirls · 10-03-2003, 11:38 AM

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Buff · 10-03-2003, 12:22 PM

I'll wager that the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Republican is easily 2 to 3 times that of the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Democrat, even though the Democrats on this board outnumber the Republicans maybe 5 to 1 or so.

That's what speaks for itself.

The Truth Hurts · 10-03-2003, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich

That's a hell of a lot better than what's coming from Bush.

and WHAT exactly is coming from bush?

Elli · 10-03-2003, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jas1552
Copa (had it not been ruled unconstitutional) would have required sexually explicit material on the internet to be behind an electronic age barrier. With punishment for non compliance being huge fines and jail time. In other words no more galleries or freesites. AVS only or jail. So using your logic anyone who makes galleries or freesites or puts any porn on the internet other than behind an AVS and votes democrat (or at the very least supported Clinton) is a dumbass idiot.

Edit: where I say "AVS" I should have said "AVS or paysite"

Yes, but that is actually how he protected the adult industry. He made it legal, and set out clear rules (or tried) on how to run a site above-the-law. Bush/Ash. just want to outlaw the entire category.

Furious_Female · 10-03-2003, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

and WHAT exactly is coming from bush?

That's what my question is, what exactly is coming? No one knows yet. I am more afraid of what Visa/MasterCard might do in the future, not any administrations.

I think there should be some regulation in porn on the net. All you "the sky is falling" ignorant people, seem to think the net would forever go unpoliced and that obscenity laws don't already exist. Adult stores/theaters offline can't show and advertise where they want, why should ones online be able to? If you believe it's ok for kids to come into contact with it, so easily... you are scum regardless of what political party you vote for.

I have no problem doing all I can to prevent minors from seeing my sites. In fact, I already do it. I do not need or want children viewing my sites or wasting my bandwidth and I also don't condone many niches like fantasy rape/murder, scat etc. If you chicken little people believe mainstream porn is going to be completely banished from existence, you need to learn a little more about what they plan on doing and targetting. Then again, if you are making a living off of children clicking your "free" porn sites or seriously demented people who enjoy fantasy rape sites, you probably don't give a fuck either way.

Rictor · 10-03-2003, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
I'll wager that the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Republican is easily 2 to 3 times that of the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Democrat, even though the Democrats on this board outnumber the Republicans maybe 5 to 1 or so.

That's what speaks for itself.

Well, that would make sense, seeing as how the Republican party is the party of the rich. They give tax cuts to the rich and try to find as many new ways to fuck the poor and middle class as much as possible.

Of course, there aren't enough rich people in this country to actually elect a Republican president, so that's where the fake religious worship comes in. The Republicans protect the moral majority from seeing boobies on TV or getting their guns taken away so they can't protect themselves at the KKK rallies, and in exchange get votes.

The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. Education spending is decreased so the voters don't attain the knowledge they need to actually vote intelligently and the cycle continues.

genomega · 10-03-2003, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jas1552
Clinton signed Copa. I guess that would make Democrat adult webmasters a bunch of dumbass idiots huh?

Yep, their memories are shorter than their dicks.

It was a conservative cout that overturned it.

Carlito · 10-03-2003, 03:34 PM

Yeah - Republican Legislators are not totally stupid, they`ll destroy the *entire* internet if they were to destroy adult.

The internet is what it is because of advances made because of adult content and network use.

rooster · 10-03-2003, 03:38 PM

also remember the gores once led a crusade against music.

read this senate transcript

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a376806d70cec.htm

tony286 · 10-03-2003, 03:40 PM

The net is very hard for them to control by the simple fact its world wide. So whats illegal in the USA is not illegal in Europe. They can go after individuals in the USA but cleaning up porn on the net, is close to impossible. The funny thing is most of the irresponsible stuff comes from the good ol USA, I get graphic spam all day long and its all American companies and sites with American third party processors lol. You can say all you want about the Democrats but the simple fact remains the biggest porn crackdowns in our life time have been done by Republicans. The Meese comission and now this.

Carlito · 10-03-2003, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Female

That's what my question is, what exactly is coming? No one knows yet. I am more afraid of what Visa/MasterCard might do in the future, not any administrations.

I think there should be some regulation in porn on the net. All you "the sky is falling" ignorant people, seem to think the net would forever go unpoliced and that obscenity laws don't already exist. Adult stores/theaters offline can't show and advertise where they want, why should ones online be able to? If you believe it's ok for kids to come into contact with it, so easily... you are scum regardless of what political party you vote for.

I have no problem doing all I can to prevent minors from seeing my sites. In fact, I already do it. I do not need or want children viewing my sites or wasting my bandwidth and I also don't condone many niches like fantasy rape/murder, scat etc. If you chicken little people believe mainstream porn is going to be completely banished from existence, you need to learn a little more about what they plan on doing and targetting. Then again, if you are making a living off of children clicking your "free" porn sites or seriously demented people who enjoy fantasy rape sites, you probably don't give a fuck either way.

AMEN

I also don`t enjoy giving out huge quantities of uncensored free porn - that just hurts my paysites sales when a surfer gets off on his way there via galleries.

When TGP`s are killed, AVS and PAYSITE owners will REAP the benefits, so will content providers- because of an increased interest in rare content for fresh sites & increased retention.

BUT there is NO " Republican " that is interested in destroying our freedoms - contrary to popular belief by alot of slow thinking and short sighted people on this board.

GET AN IMAGINATION and CONSIDER the LOGICAL POSSIBILITIES.

directfiesta · 10-03-2003, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jas1552
Copa (had it not been ruled unconstitutional) would have required sexually explicit material on the internet to be behind an electronic age barrier. With punishment for non compliance being huge fines and jail time. In other words no more galleries or freesites. AVS only or jail. So using your logic anyone who makes galleries or freesites or puts any porn on the internet other than behind an AVS and votes democrat (or at the very least supported Clinton) is a dumbass idiot.

Edit: where I say "AVS" I should have said "AVS or paysite"

Too bad that was not enforced .... Business would be better and safer to operate in...

But somebody got this callenged.... BTW, who did???

To Furious_Females on "That's what my question is, what exactly is coming?", it is not coming, it has arrived... Ask Extreme Ass... about it.

Maybe you are next, mainly with all your spamming reaching kids...

lexr · 10-03-2003, 03:50 PM

One name: John A s h c r o f t

NetRodent · 10-03-2003, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rictor
Well, that would make sense, seeing as how the Republican party is the party of the rich. They give tax cuts to the rich and try to find as many new ways to fuck the poor and middle class as much as possible.

Explain to me how Bush's 2003 tax proposal fucks the poor and middle class?

http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/taxes/a/bushtaxcuts.htm

Quote:

Originally posted by Rictor
Of course, there aren't enough rich people in this country to actually elect a Republican president, so that's where the fake religious worship comes in. The Republicans protect the moral majority from seeing boobies on TV or getting their guns taken away so they can't protect themselves at the KKK rallies, and in exchange get votes.

So you're saying the Republicans give the majority what they want. Yet you seem to be implying that's a bad thing?

Quote:

Originally posted by Rictor
The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. Education spending is decreased so the voters don't attain the knowledge they need to actually vote intelligently and the cycle continues.

Where are the poor getting poorer? The standard of living in the US is better than its ever been. The problem is people are comparing their livestyles to ones they see on TV. People no longer are content with food clothing and shelter or 40 acres and a mule. Now they want 200 channels of satellite tv, two cars in the driveway and a house full of appliances. The US is a victim of its own success, few alive today can remember real hardship.

As for education that is a matter for the states and local government.

The Truth Hurts · 10-03-2003, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rictor

They give tax cuts to the rich and try to find as many new ways to fuck the poor and middle class as much as possible.

you actually buy into this bullshit?

lexr · 10-03-2003, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
The net is very hard for them to control by the simple fact its world wide. So whats illegal in the USA is not illegal in Europe. They can go after individuals in the USA but cleaning up porn on the net, is close to impossible. The funny thing is most of the irresponsible stuff comes from the good ol USA, I get graphic spam all day long and its all American companies and sites with American third party processors lol. You can say all you want about the Democrats but the simple fact remains the biggest porn crackdowns in our life time have been done by Republicans. The Meese comission and now this.

Agreed. I never said Democrats were any better, what I did say is that the idelogy that most Republicans in power (not Republicans on this board) believe in is 100% against all of us in the porn business. We're sinners and we're all going to Hell. To them (ie: Mr. Attorney General) we're lower on the totem pole than murderers and drug dealers selling drugs to 12yr olds.

Furious_Female · 10-03-2003, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

To Furious_Females on "That's what my question is, what exactly is coming?", it is not coming, it has arrived... Ask Extreme Ass... about it.

Maybe you are next, mainly with all your spamming reaching kids...

Really? Can you prove those allegations? I didn't think so! So shut the fuck up

The Truth Hurts · 10-03-2003, 03:55 PM

remember... not all republicans, are religious republicans.

just like not all democrats are whining, bitching, emotion playing, race card paying, insane morons with apparently very short memories... like the current crop of presidential candidates.

directfiesta · 10-03-2003, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts

you actually buy into this bullshit?

He is not alone:

Quote:

Democrats said affluent Americans would still reap most of $1.8 trillion in tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003, and said it is time for sacrifice to fund war and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Oct2.html

Now you quote an article with link that says the middle class and poor will benefit from those tax cuts...

rooster · 10-03-2003, 03:58 PM

so we are supposed to give tax cuts to people that dont even pay taxes?

hitman699 · 10-03-2003, 03:58 PM

Sure and democrats want to give money back to everyone except those who actually work for it. They expect the rich to support all the poor scumbags that don't work for a living so that they can live a lifestyle where there is no reason for them to get a job..

Quote:

Originally posted by Rictor

Well, that would make sense, seeing as how the Republican party is the party of the rich. They give tax cuts to the rich and try to find as many new ways to fuck the poor and middle class as much as possible.

Of course, there aren't enough rich people in this country to actually elect a Republican president, so that's where the fake religious worship comes in. The Republicans protect the moral majority from seeing boobies on TV or getting their guns taken away so they can't protect themselves at the KKK rallies, and in exchange get votes.

The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. Education spending is decreased so the voters don't attain the knowledge they need to actually vote intelligently and the cycle continues.

hottoddy · 10-03-2003, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by uranidiot
How are your plans for moving to mainstream coming along?

How will your life look without the income you've grown accumstomed to?
...

Just fine thanks. I'm a lawyer who just stumbled into it for the easy money. I will soon be making more defending people like you.

Please keep voting for more taxes and increased regulations. More lawyers will be needed to help the little guy make sense of it all.

The Truth Hurts · 10-03-2003, 04:08 PM

Not gonna get into a tax debate..

you dem followers are blinded by the fact that they lump all "rich" together as some evil group.. the 80k a year guy and the billion dollar corporations, all technically "rich"... and the 80k a year guy gets fucked.

and the republican followers are blinded by meaningless trinkets disguised as a tax break.

the whole system is fucked, and blatantly discrimanatory.

where's the fucking aclu on this one?

robin hood was a good story, but hardly a basis for a tax system.

ADL Colin · 10-03-2003, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

But somebody got this callenged.... BTW, who did???

American Civil Liberties Union

messiah1 · 10-03-2003, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
Not gonna get into a tax debate..

you dem followers are blinded by the fact that they lump all "rich" together as some evil group.. the 80k a year guy and the billion dollar corporations, all technically "rich"... and the 80k a year guy gets fucked.

and the republican followers are blinded by meaningless trinkets disguised as a tax break.

the whole system is fucked, and blatantly discrimanatory.

where's the fucking aclu on this one?

robin hood was a good story, but hardly a basis for a tax system.

80K is rich what are you smoking?. Yes the whole system is fucked and the republicans are for the rich and so are the democrats. Rich men are the men of best quality in are fascist poltical system. The merger between corporate and govermental powers has been acheived so I agree were fucked. The american people will take this country into hell by not paying any attention to what is going on.
I am not a democrat I am a independent who voted for Nader in the last election.

directfiesta · 10-03-2003, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
so we are supposed to give tax cuts to people that dont even pay taxes?

As expected, just your opinions... no article, no link....
Just a foul odor that makes me beleive that you think and speak with your ass.

You could give to those who do not pay taxes a 100% return.... LOL

Quote:

The 57 to 42 vote, largely along party lines, scuttled an amendment that would have raised the rate on taxable incomes over $312,000 to 38.2 percent in 2005, from the 35 percent rate that took effect this year.

Notice how they speak of percventage ... Percentage of nothing is nothing but one of alot is.... guess if you can...

Stay in your blinded position as always...

uranidiot · 10-03-2003, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
I'll wager that the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Republican is easily 2 to 3 times that of the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Democrat, even though the Democrats on this board outnumber the Republicans maybe 5 to 1 or so.

That's what speaks for itself.

All that proves is porn attracts the ignorant.

Serge may be rich, but he's hardly the sharpest tool in the box, right?

Someone with much more money and power than everyone on this board together condemns Bush.

THAT speaks volumes.

Read this you dumb shit:

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=181146

10-03-2003, 07:31 AM	#1
uranidiot So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 566	This is for Republican adult webmasters How are your plans for moving to mainstream coming along? How will your life look without the income you've grown accumstomed to? You keep voting right-wing. That's your choice. But when the rug gets pulled out from under the porn industry, make sure you're ready. You're attacking your own livelihood, so make sure you're ready for the coming change. With term number two the attack on porn will come full force. Why shouldn't it? it's not as if they would have anything to lose. And you're sinners anyway so you opinion doesn't count. That's just the way it goes.

10-03-2003, 07:32 AM	#2
Sharky Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 4,938	wow. u r an idiot __________________ Sharky

10-03-2003, 07:47 AM	#6
iroc409 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: midwest side, yo Posts: 4,728	all your tgps are belong to bush. __________________ <a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a> icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0 Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!

10-03-2003, 11:13 AM	#12
jas1552 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Land of the free, home of the brave Posts: 1,462	Copa (had it not been ruled unconstitutional) would have required sexually explicit material on the internet to be behind an electronic age barrier. With punishment for non compliance being huge fines and jail time. In other words no more galleries or freesites. AVS only or jail. So using your logic anyone who makes galleries or freesites or puts any porn on the internet other than behind an AVS and votes democrat (or at the very least supported Clinton) is a dumbass idiot. Edit: where I say "AVS" I should have said "AVS or paysite" Last edited by jas1552; 10-03-2003 at 11:22 AM..

10-03-2003, 11:38 AM	#15
PerfectionGirls Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MI Posts: 4,484	LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

10-03-2003, 07:43 AM	#4
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	i focus on softcore. So to be honest, I wouldnt even care if there was a huge crackdown. I think there is some companies that deserve it. I think from a logical point of view, changes will be coming. A kid cant walk into a stripclub or adult bookstore without an id, but they can go to a website and see tons of hardcore porn? Also, I dont think its good to pick a president on the sole basis of who has a softer stance on porn.

10-03-2003, 07:46 AM	#5
doober Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: in yoOoo kitchen Posts: 6,984	what about arnie?

10-03-2003, 10:42 AM	#7
lexr Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Tempe, AZ Posts: 428	"Republican Adult Webmaster" is like an oxymoron really. I mean, Republican ideologists believe you're worse than drug dealers and murderers and would rather lock you away for life just for peddling porn. If you don't believe me, look to the man who replaced Janet Reno and see if I'm wrong. ;) Anyone who's on GFY and still a Republican should reconsider their political affiliations and ponder as to whether or not their undying loyalty to the party is appreciated by those in power.

10-03-2003, 10:58 AM	#10
jas1552 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Land of the free, home of the brave Posts: 1,462	Clinton signed Copa. I guess that would make Democrat adult webmasters a bunch of dumbass idiots huh?

10-03-2003, 12:22 PM	#16
Buff GFY Assassin Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,993	I'll wager that the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Republican is easily 2 to 3 times that of the aggregate net worth of the porn webmasters on this board who vote Democrat, even though the Democrats on this board outnumber the Republicans maybe 5 to 1 or so. That's what speaks for itself.

10-03-2003, 03:34 PM	#22
Carlito Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Texas Posts: 856	Yeah - Republican Legislators are not totally stupid, they`ll destroy the entire internet if they were to destroy adult. The internet is what it is because of advances made because of adult content and network use.

10-03-2003, 03:38 PM	#23
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	also remember the gores once led a crusade against music. read this senate transcript http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a376806d70cec.htm

10-03-2003, 03:40 PM	#24
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	The net is very hard for them to control by the simple fact its world wide. So whats illegal in the USA is not illegal in Europe. They can go after individuals in the USA but cleaning up porn on the net, is close to impossible. The funny thing is most of the irresponsible stuff comes from the good ol USA, I get graphic spam all day long and its all American companies and sites with American third party processors lol. You can say all you want about the Democrats but the simple fact remains the biggest porn crackdowns in our life time have been done by Republicans. The Meese comission and now this. Last edited by tony299; 10-03-2003 at 03:42 PM..

10-03-2003, 03:50 PM	#27
lexr Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Tempe, AZ Posts: 428	One name: John A s h c r o f t

10-03-2003, 03:55 PM	#32
The Truth Hurts Zph7YXfjMhg Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: In Your Skull Posts: 15,333	remember... not all republicans, are religious republicans. just like not all democrats are whining, bitching, emotion playing, race card paying, insane morons with apparently very short memories... like the current crop of presidential candidates.

10-03-2003, 03:58 PM	#34
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	so we are supposed to give tax cuts to people that dont even pay taxes?

10-03-2003, 04:08 PM	#37
The Truth Hurts Zph7YXfjMhg Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: In Your Skull Posts: 15,333	Not gonna get into a tax debate.. you dem followers are blinded by the fact that they lump all "rich" together as some evil group.. the 80k a year guy and the billion dollar corporations, all technically "rich"... and the 80k a year guy gets fucked. and the republican followers are blinded by meaningless trinkets disguised as a tax break. the whole system is fucked, and blatantly discrimanatory. where's the fucking aclu on this one? robin hood was a good story, but hardly a basis for a tax system.