This was a good read. Nice to see another site taken to justice. This industry doesn't need more of this guy.

the site looks down for me. :1orglaugh

and you carbon5, what can I say? You just make typos that go exactly with your meta tags, and you made profit of it, and of course, never noticed it. yeah, that's right, you run a business and you never noticed you're a pedo :ak47: :BangBang: I hope some disturbed psychopat like you and all your clients finds you in a dark alley, after all, that's what you like

life sucks, indeed. and it sucks more due to people like you :feels-hot

Damn, dude is busted. Can't believe he said it was an accident! yea how do you look over "pre teen model" and not notice that

jDoG

Thats a LAME excuse! Anyone n the porn biz would know NOT to use such keywords because they would more then likely get you in trouble.. No matter how much traffic you think you would get with those keywords you should NOT use them!

Now, with keywords like that, who do you think you are attracting? regular porn surfers? FUCK NO! you are targetting PEDOS!

So to say that they are just meta tags for search engines use is fucking bullshit. If you really wanted good, legal keywords you would have removed the ones that pertain to preteen, lolita or anything underage.. And obviously to get your so called premade list you would have had to do a search using those keywords or a part of them

As for the Playboy keyword.. if Playboy finds out you better run and hide.

Saying that typing 16 was a typo is all good BUT when you have keywords like that what do you think people will think about you?

I run a legal teen TGP and nowhere on my site will you see anything that reffers to underage girls.. not in the title, the keyword or anywhere.. So the point is, you are a sick fuck!

Yngwie

we should contact his host as well. I bet very few if none would like this clown as a client

Apparently CCBill didn't mind him as a client until it was exposed on a big place like this.

Funny thing is they were passing her site off as a 16 year old model and she looks to old to be on a Lightspeed site!

I wouldn't say that was the case - I think someone emailed them about it - and it was posted here at the same time. I don't think they would let that slip.

Oh so you're saying the site was changed after being approved, which I don't believe is the case at all. Clearly the site was marketed as teen model non nude site and I would bet they let it in because of that, while sites like that aren't illegal we all know what purpose those sites serve and CCBill cares about money above all else as do most other companies.

I like how he said the keywords were a "template" yet the word "dani" is nicely placed next to the word "preteen"

Digipimp,

We process for thousands of existing websites that constantly change and have hundreds of accounts added to existing accounts every single day. We have a review department that goes through the sites based on set rules that are designed to bring the accounts with risk factors to our eyes so that we can look at them right away and as well, periodically review every single account we have within a set cycle.

We turn accounts off every single day. This is very frustrating to me to have to try to explain this. If we find an account that is violating our AUP, it will be addressed immediately. Period.

You don't have to explain anything to me I understand how you work as do all other companies work. I know you guys have a ton of sites to manage and review and that things get by from time to time I suppose. So in your response you would be implying that this site was not accepted as it was but was changed after it was reviewed is that correct? If I were you guys I would watch taking a position on this either way so that you don't get proven wrong, you shut the account down and that's the right thing to do.

I shoot full nakid, run nn for a year, then go softcore, then full.. wtf I get three trips in three markets before it's worn and tired.

I have nothing to do with pedo but 80% of my current sales result from softcore/nonnude tease live cam sites.

So please, let's make this clear -18 BAD, +18 GOOD..

greetings from canada btw.

Thats very true

Yngwie

I have already emailed the head counsel at playboy :thumbsup

Fletch I tend to agree with you..

tgps have scripts that check galleries several times a day. why can't the processors have the same type of script that scans meta and text on the page once a day? that way, if any forbidden words get added, they can immediately yank the account.

Because then they wouldn't make any money. :1orglaugh

who cares, the site will return with verotel as its cc processor.

Poseur. Here's the real deal.

http://www.theinformationminister.co...p?ID=612319603

How can a minor make a legally binding contract?
How can a minor consent to the sale of their likeness (for any reason) until they are an adult?
They can not.

The picture "may" be taken - but the contract is void until they are an adult and can legally consent to the sale of them.

<H3>BYE BYE - all fucking teen "model" website</H3>

In the terminology of this board ...
FUCK OFF AND DIE ALL "TEEN MODEL" WEBSITES ...

We know who you cater too ...

So let me make this point blank clear.
You (any distributing the likenesses) are at risk of being sued by the minor you took advantage of when she becomes an adult.

Visa knows it too ...
CC processors know this too ...

BYE BYE all "teen model" websites ???
Not quite - but she better be an adult NOW if they are being sold.

If you sold pictures of a minor while they were a minor there are four word you need to understand;

PUNITIVE DAMAGES
RISK MANAGEMENT

IMO

This is a "chat board" now with the speed of posts.
I don't care if I miss a "plural" or other "gramatical" error ...
You need to stop attacking the messenger and start attacking the message.

Your handle is being memorizde ...
[pun intended]

:(

I find that "typo" as noted in this thread pretty hard to belive too...
All I saw was their original homepage.

I didn't see 2257 compliance originally and much earlier today.
I didn't see an ICRA.org statement either.

If the "model" is not currently an adult ...
I smell a lot of legal and police heat for someone.

And when she is an adult ...
I smell major FUCKING LAWSUITES ...
against any company that profited from the sale of her underage identity.

You can not sell something that belongs to someone else without their permission.

A minor can not legally make a "binding contract" in this situation.

I smell big time shut downs as the internet grows up.

GoodDomains.com (?) I am presuming ...
if not then GoodDomains the handle on GFY ...

Awesome thread.
Open - frank - and with results.

GoodDomains.com
Good job.
We need more of this.

Brad, you should offer your services to CC Bill on a consulting basis. You seem to have a long history for and a very natural talent at finding password traders, hackers, cheaters, underage sites ... you should leverage it. Helps clean up the industry too.

I certainly don't build under -18 sites. Tthe 18+ nn is a totally diffrerent market and nothing to do with these underage modelling pedo site. The 18+ nn market is pretty good when promoted with the right intentions.

I don't condone under 18 content, and to put it on the same site as adult sponsors/content is fucking sickening. Over here in the UK, models can go topless in the newspaper at 16 and also have sex legally. I'm sure Sam Fox was 16 when she first started getting her tits out for a major newspaper. Laws are different worldwide.

I've reported two sites this last week to the ASACP - both featured underage nude content and one of the sites had already had thousands of complaints. Both of these were classed as nude art sites and the ASACP could do nothing else. The sites is question would no doubt try to portray themselves as modelling portfollio/advertising type sites... so fuck knows what the chance of legal action is.

http://www.dani-model.com/

already in down. someone has done a great work. =)

You didnt just miss a plural or a gramatical error. Your whole post was worse than a fucking full blown russian posting to try and sell his 6 digit icq uin. i couldnt comprehend the first two lines and the rest looked like it followed suit.

dude, it is obvious to everyone here that your WHOLE goal was to try and push this to pedophiles...OPPS! missed the '16' on there...OPPS! Missed the PreTeen metatags...uh...just use them for traffic...

what the fuck kind of traffic do you think you were going to get using shit like that???

it is people like you that give this industry a bad name and make it tough for the legit guys to keep there doors open. you should be strung up by your balls, when "bubba" gets his big old hands on you in the big house.

Well, first of all sorry about my english.

I dont understand you guys...
My friends doutcher want to be a model. she is 14 years old , so her parents biled her non nude site with her photos.
ofcourse her parents dont have any problemms with that.
This girls earnining money from her website, and also very enjoi it.
More than that, a lot of profesional agenncyes, wanted to shoot her, after thay saw the web site.
Modeling carier it what she want to do in her life, and she is very preaty.
SO WHAT WRONG WITH THAT???????

That some pedofils can be a members of her site? ok, thatre is a posibillity, and she know that....but she want a modeling carier, so she dont care about that.

IMHO its all depends...
If you have underage site, with little girls , with open legs, (even non nude), with sexsual posez, with a panty and bra. this is BAD !
But if you have a NN site, even -18, with a good modeling photos.
with no provocative shoot. I dont see any problemm with that.

doesnt open at all now

Mylene
As you are obviouslt too stupid to work it out I will tell you what is wrong with it.

1) In most countries it's illegal.

2) We are trying to hold onto our jobs and sites like this make it harder.

3) You are so obviously one of the peadophiilles that like child porn maybe the moderators should report your IP address.

*calm down Paul*

LOl !

No, you are wrong :)
I am 22 years old girl
And i am going to open my Non nude site soon...and i have a lot of my pics, from the age of 15-16, that i am thinking to post to this site.
(non nude photos).

And, again, i dont think that something wrong with that ! It my chouse what photos to post to my site, and i am more than 18 to disaide it, right?

You thisnk that non nude site of 15-16 years girls ist teriblle, and not ligal...i dont see it thats way.

thats all.

And charly

I am aginst the child porn...and all lolita sites.

I gues you didnt understand what i am tolking about....
I am just saying that NON NUDE site its ok. and just and only if thay LEGAl. with no open legs shotes and things like that.

http://www.teenmeup.com/preview.html

look at this
This what i am tolking about, she is 16...maybe its a crapy site.
But its seems like totaly ligal to me.

Where are you going to advertise these underage nn sites?

Who wants to bet that Mylene is that same person as carbon5?

So if I'm to understand you mistakenly promoted her as 16, but you intentionally targetted keywords like "preteen"?

Do you think we're all idiots?

FATPad

There is a lot of ways t it.
NN link list, top, links exange with simeler non nude sites.
Also i will give 50% to resellers :)

In non nude you will never get the trafiic like on the adult site.
But its possible to have 2000-3000 people a day.

....this thread is still going? :Buck: