Californians that watched the debate tonight provide your thinking - GoFuckYourself.com

Rinaldo · 09-24-2003, 07:35 PM

I didnt get a chance to see it.. did arnold speak?

rooster · 09-24-2003, 07:36 PM

id vote for arnold because he has the best chance to win, but mclintock is pretty impressive.

Busamante is the only other viable candidate, but hes part of the problem of why their is a recall in the first place.

theking · 09-24-2003, 07:37 PM

Well...what is your thinking about the debate tonight? Who impressed you the most...who presented the best plans for dealing with the issues that were presented?

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 07:38 PM

arianna= airhead liar

theking · 09-24-2003, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rinaldo
I didnt get a chance to see it.. did arnold speak?

Yes.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 09-24-2003, 07:39 PM

I goto Vote for Davis.

If Arnold was not Republican I would prolly vote for em, but at this point the Republican Party clearly has not got The American People in mind these days.

I have little doubt that Arnold would actually do a good job, but California would face alot of problems with the Republican Party running the show and Arnold having to take bribes to create laws that would hurt the foundations of California.

lightswitch · 09-24-2003, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
id vote for arnold because he has the best chance to win, but mclintock is pretty impressive.

Busamante is the only other viable candidate, but hes part of the problem of why their is a recall in the first place.

I agree Mclintock has my vote i think, too bad uberof dropped out.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut
arianna= airhead liar

Honeyslut = clueless airhead

baddog · 09-24-2003, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
I goto Vote for Davis.

damn, I never thought you would have a rational thought, but there you go.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
id vote for arnold because he has the best chance to win,

Arnold was dropping faster than the panties of a freshman coed at her first frat party, but tonight will bring him to a new low, I am sure.

McLintock, well, at least you know where he stands, but he does not stand a chance.

They should have these every night with 5 different candidates until all 130+ were shown on TV, that would insure the the recall was defeated.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rinaldo
I didnt get a chance to see it.. did arnold speak?

he was funny, could not stand the fact that he was getting 0wn3d by a chick

GrimShawn · 09-24-2003, 07:53 PM

How did gary Colman do?

baddog · 09-24-2003, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GrimShawn
How did gary Colman do?

the racists running the debate would not let the black man speak. You would think it was Mississippi in 1960 or something

uranidiot · 09-24-2003, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Well...what is your thinking about the debate tonight? Who impressed you the most...who presented the best plans for dealing with the issues that were presented?

When did you first realize you were obsessed with politics?

uranidiot · 09-24-2003, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rooster
id vote for arnold

of course you would.

He's now got the hick vote all sewn up.

jimmyf · 09-24-2003, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut
arianna= airhead liar

baddog · 09-24-2003, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf

okay, what lie did she say tonight?

jimmyf · 09-24-2003, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog

okay, what lie did she say tonight?

arianna= airhead, I was agree with

tony286 · 09-24-2003, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf

arianna= airhead, I was agree with

She is nationally syndicated columnist and author of nine books, two were best sellers and graduated from Cambridge University with an M.A. in Economics. What does your bio look like lol.

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 09:39 PM

Her comment that people are not leaving California is BULLSHIT.

I called Uhaul a few weeks ago to try and rent a trailer to pull a car. I was told there are very few in the area since everyone is leaving California and no one is moving back with the uhauls etc..

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog

Honeyslut = clueless airhead

shut the fuck up

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404

She is nationally syndicated columnist and author of nine books, two were best sellers and graduated from Cambridge University with an M.A. in Economics. What does your bio look like lol.

and I can name off a list of doctors who never found my husband's brain tumor the last 10 years..

Mr.Fiction · 09-24-2003, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut

I called Uhaul a few weeks ago to try and rent a trailer to pull a car. I was told there are very few in the area since everyone is leaving California and no one is moving back with the uhauls etc..

Probably because they're afraid Arnold might win.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut
Her comment that people are not leaving California is BULLSHIT.

I called Uhaul a few weeks ago to try and rent a trailer to pull a car. I was told there are very few in the area since everyone is leaving California and no one is moving back with the uhauls etc..

damn you are dumb.. . . . sure, people move every fucking day . . . .however, more people move in.

Why do people move? because property is so expensive. Why is property so expensive? Because more people want to buy homes than there are homes to buy.

Now, if you want to move out of the state I will find a truck for you.

And for the record, a friend of mine just moved from San Jose to LA, with a U-Haul truck.

I am glad you are getting a pulse on the status of the state from the guy at U-Haul.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut

shut the fuck up

witty retort for a clueless airhead, I rescind that comment. How about clueless bubblehead?

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction

Probably because they're afraid Arnold might win.

LOL

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog

damn you are dumb.. . . . sure, people move every fucking day . . . .however, more people move in.

Why do people move? because property is so expensive. Why is property so expensive? Because more people want to buy homes than there are homes to buy.

Now, if you want to move out of the state I will find a truck for you.

And for the record, a friend of mine just moved from San Jose to LA, with a U-Haul truck.

I am glad you are getting a pulse on the status of the state from the guy at U-Haul.

I think you better do some research on more people moving to the state..

Keep talking out your ass

LOL..

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf

arianna= airhead, I was agree with

I would hardly call her an airhead, she had Arnold on the ropes so fast it made the entire debate entertaining. He was an ass, trying to talk over everyone else, just because he was the biggest guy on the stage.

He lost a lot of votes tonight

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut

I think you better do some research on more people moving to the state..

Keep talking out your ass

LOL..

Consider that by 2035, California's population will approximately double to 64 million, if current population growth continues! This projection is based on the state's current 2% annual growth rate -- a rate that is greater than the national growth rate of 1.1%

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog

Consider that by 2035, California's population will approximately double to 64 million, if current population growth continues! This projection is based on the state's current 2% annual growth rate -- a rate that is greater than the national growth rate of 1.1%

http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2003/08/04/daily20.html

Here ya go smartie pants

theking · 09-24-2003, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut

and I can name off a list of doctors who never found my husband's brain tumor the last 10 years..

I guess I misunderstood...I did not think it was a brain tumor. Is it operable...if not what treatment is he undergoing? I am confused.

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut
http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2003/08/04/daily20.html

Here ya go smartie pants

For the first time since the federal government began tracking such things, more people have moved out of California to other states than have arrived from the other 49. The moving vans headed east and north represented a net of 775,000 people who gave up on California, according to reports Wednesday from the Census Bureau.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:24 PM

According to the state of California?s Demographic Division of the Department of Finance, the state?s population was estimated to be 29,828,000 July 1, 1990. It rose to an estimated 34,036,000 in 2000. Thus the population increased by 4,208,000 between July 1, 1990 and July 1, 2000.1To gain a better perspective on the meaning of this number, consider the fact that all the northeastern states from Maine to Virginia, combined, gained less than 4 million people over the same period.

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

I guess I misunderstood...I did not think it was a brain tumor. Is it operable...if not what treatment is he undergoing? I am confused.

Pituitary tumor in gland which is at the base of the brain.

Close enough and fucks him up the same way..

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
According to the state of California?s Demographic Division of the Department of Finance, the state?s population was estimated to be 29,828,000 July 1, 1990. It rose to an estimated 34,036,000 in 2000. Thus the population increased by 4,208,000 between July 1, 1990 and July 1, 2000.1To gain a better perspective on the meaning of this number, consider the fact that all the northeastern states from Maine to Virginia, combined, gained less than 4 million people over the same period.

I am talking about NOW not 2 to 10 years ago.Gez .

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut
For the first time since the federal government began tracking such things, more people have moved out of California to other states than have arrived from the other 49. The moving vans headed east and north represented a net of 775,000 people who gave up on California, according to reports Wednesday from the Census Bureau.

So, more people move here from other countries, and transplants move out to the desert. Why? Because property is cheap out there. I do hope you are planning on joining them. I will help, I promise.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut

I am talking about NOW not 2 to 10 years ago.Gez .

Consider that by 2035, California's population will approximately double to 64 million, if current population growth continues! This projection is based on the state's current 2% annual growth rate -- a rate that is greater than the national growth rate of 1.1%

just one question, do you have a problem with people moving out of CA? I sure don't.

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:51 PM

Whocares if they leave. I just proving I am not talking out my ASS

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._census06.html

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...sus-lede_x.htm

Honeyslut · 09-24-2003, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog

So, more people move here from other countries, and transplants move out to the desert. Why? Because property is cheap out there. I do hope you are planning on joining them. I will help, I promise.

My place is going to be worth a million when I am done with it..

I am here to stay unless I get a 2nd place in Tahoe..

baddog · 09-24-2003, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut

My place is going to be worth a million when I am done with it..

I am here to stay unless I get a 2nd place in Tahoe..

okay, now let's stop and think here. If everyone is leaving the state, your property value will drop, because it becomes a buyers market.

But when there are more people than homes, then it becomes a sellers market and prices go up. And it does not matter what kind of remodeling you do to it. If no one is here to buy it, it will decrease in value.

See how that works? More people are moving in than are moving out. It does not matter where they are moving from.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Honeyslut
Whocares if they leave. I just proving I am not talking out my ASS

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._census06.html

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...sus-lede_x.htm

from your own article:

Spurred by immigration, however, California's population still rose 14 percent, or 4.1 million people, between 1990 and 2000 to nearly 33.9 million. Its foreign-born population rose by more than one-third to almost 8.9 million.

More people are moving in, than are moving out.

baddog · 09-24-2003, 11:03 PM

About 2.2 million people left California in the late 1990s, when the state was reeling from a series of tumultuous events, including earthquakes, race riots, economic downturns, a wave of foreign immigration and skyrocketing housing prices.

So, blame the dot com issue on Wilson/Bush - blame the earthquakes on Davis . . . . oh, that was Wilson too, wasn't it?

zzgundamnzz · 09-24-2003, 11:04 PM

Anybody notice how many times per second they blinked?

09-24-2003, 07:37 PM	#3
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	Californians that watched the debate tonight provide your thinking Well...what is your thinking about the debate tonight? Who impressed you the most...who presented the best plans for dealing with the issues that were presented? __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

09-24-2003, 07:38 PM	#4
Honeyslut Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ass Valley, Ca Posts: 6,436	arianna= airhead liar __________________ http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !

09-24-2003, 07:39 PM	#6
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	I goto Vote for Davis. If Arnold was not Republican I would prolly vote for em, but at this point the Republican Party clearly has not got The American People in mind these days. I have little doubt that Arnold would actually do a good job, but California would face alot of problems with the Republican Party running the show and Arnold having to take bribes to create laws that would hurt the foundations of California. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

09-24-2003, 09:39 PM	#20
Honeyslut Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ass Valley, Ca Posts: 6,436	Her comment that people are not leaving California is BULLSHIT. I called Uhaul a few weeks ago to try and rent a trailer to pull a car. I was told there are very few in the area since everyone is leaving California and no one is moving back with the uhauls etc.. __________________ http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !

09-24-2003, 10:51 PM	#38
Honeyslut Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ass Valley, Ca Posts: 6,436	Whocares if they leave. I just proving I am not talking out my ASS http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._census06.html http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...sus-lede_x.htm __________________ http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !

09-24-2003, 07:35 PM	#1
Rinaldo Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: South Florida Posts: 5,086	I didnt get a chance to see it.. did arnold speak?

09-24-2003, 07:36 PM	#2
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	id vote for arnold because he has the best chance to win, but mclintock is pretty impressive. Busamante is the only other viable candidate, but hes part of the problem of why their is a recall in the first place.

09-24-2003, 07:53 PM	#12
GrimShawn Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: BONEPRONE MANSION serving drinks! Posts: 8,120	How did gary Colman do?

09-24-2003, 10:24 PM	#33
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	According to the state of California?s Demographic Division of the Department of Finance, the state?s population was estimated to be 29,828,000 July 1, 1990. It rose to an estimated 34,036,000 in 2000. Thus the population increased by 4,208,000 between July 1, 1990 and July 1, 2000.1To gain a better perspective on the meaning of this number, consider the fact that all the northeastern states from Maine to Virginia, combined, gained less than 4 million people over the same period.

09-24-2003, 11:03 PM	#42
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	About 2.2 million people left California in the late 1990s, when the state was reeling from a series of tumultuous events, including earthquakes, race riots, economic downturns, a wave of foreign immigration and skyrocketing housing prices. So, blame the dot com issue on Wilson/Bush - blame the earthquakes on Davis . . . . oh, that was Wilson too, wasn't it?

09-24-2003, 11:04 PM	#43
zzgundamnzz Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 6,102	Anybody notice how many times per second they blinked? __________________