No problem.

I'll also be in charge of the bong packing!

After all being stoned is an important ingredient for any major uprising!

I'll need a model release form from you :)

Wow! :eek7 ignorance runs rampant across Canada... please don't reproduce!

I'm not aware of how much foreign aide we give to Canada, if any... so NO I was not referring to Canada as another pathetic piece of shit country.

Take your dim witted "sarcasm" and :321GFY

Heh, that might be correct if I was an avid hater of the U.S., but I'm not. I'm simply sick and tired of watching George Bush pull an otherwise great nation to the ground. If you don't give a fuck what he does with your tax dollars, good for you, just shows the level of YOUR ignorance. Me, I just voiced my opinion on what I feel to be a subject that affects me indirectly, even if not directly. Calm down, take another Mydol, and fish a little deeper in those pockets, dear.

I respect that, and I think it's great.. I'm not pissing and moaning about all of you in general.. but please, tell me what good Bush has done for you lately? I agree that Saddam needed to be taken out of Iraq, but please... to continue to dump dollar after dollar into the endless money pit that is the continuing war with Korea on the horizon? Wouldn't you rather see YOUR tax dollars and everything you enlisted to protect, well.. PROTECTED with money WELL SPENT? I guess I don't have a right to say anything, but I'm an opinionated little bitch, and for as long as I have to watch Bush self-glorifying and justifying his actions, I'll bitch about it :)

And for the record, my mother IS an american citizen, it's not like I'm some hick Canadian who doesn't know anything about the states except for where it is on the map. Were it not for 9/11, I'd have my dual citizenship right now, and I WOULD be paying US taxes.

Good one lmfao

your not aware of much...

One thing I've realized, you don't bring a twit to a wit fight! And U sweetie are not armed.

Nite.

Yes Bush is single handedly bringing our nation down. That's an accurate statement :1orglaugh

I've never had any say as to what he or any other president does with my tax money. I don't know of any tax payers that have that option. I would be ignorant yeah, if I believed I could steer the direction of my tax dollars. I'm not interested in starting a movement or taking a stance against where money is spent and where it's not.

Amazing how many Democratic party gatherings were orchestrated at the expense of tax payers, but it only becomes a money issue when it's not being used for something "exciting".

You started this bullshit post with your ridiculous rant... I'm just replying. Sorry to inform you, not everyone supports whatever opinions you have.

:1orglaugh deep :thumbsup

If I was in the armed forces, I wouldnt be able to make the kind of money I do, which means I would be taxed less, and less money for the war on terrorism.


My taxes are worth more to the war on terrorism than most enlisted mens lives.

Nobody will contest Bush because it is a crime to protest near the President. Apparently there is a loophole for protests which support the President or there is some selective language so that Republicans protesting Democrats in front of Bush don't head toward prison. Then again maybe he can fuck over anyone now with guys in dark suits knocking on your door at 3 in the morning. Fuck, he already has sorry. Well those were just people trying to get an advanced degree and help make the U.S. the most technologically advanced nation. Instead we get 400,000 new California drivers imported yearly already and besides the schools are already packed.

That was a most ignorant statement.

Actually those were the exact words of the pollster that is always on Inside Politics at 4Pm EST.

So even Conservatives are not very fond of Bush.

okay that is random

Ok..please JUSTIFY the war in Iraq!
Can't wait to hear your justifications.

You do live in an alternative universe if you think those that are opposed to the "Bush Doctrine" are just a small vocal minority!

Oh WHOO! Unless you've been a grunt in the military, you shouldn't have an opinion on what our foreign policy is supposed to be? I'm proud of the Gomer Pyle's that can give such important informed decisions that guides the fate of this nation.

And what about those that HAVE and/or are IN the military now and oppose the current foreign policy?

You have no monopoly on "serving" your country simply by being in the military!

For your information, zeke, I wasn't a grunt nor was I a marine. I repaired these things called aerial surveillance systems. But I'm sure someone of your limited intelligence can't grasp the concept.

Where did I say I had a monopoly? What have you done to serve your country other than spouting useless drivel on an adult bbs? What contribution have you made to society other than provide laughter to the rest of us with your incessant rhetoric spewage?

I will make an attempt.

We were attacked on 9/11. We decided that it would be better in the future to be proactive rather than reactive. We know Saddam hates the US with a passion. Saddam was sitting on billions of dollars of oil. North Korea has developed nukes and is desperate for money. There is a chance Saddam could have bought a nuke from North Korea and given it to members of Al-Qaeda or some other islamic militants. Saddam had WMDs and WMD development programs, what he has done with them is anyones guess. Saddam started a war and agreed to terms to obtain a ceasefire. He didn't live up to those terms. Breaking the agreement alone was enough justification to end the ceasefire.

The war is costing many billions of dollars. How much would it cost if a nuke were detonated or other WMDs used in a US city? What are the odds of that happening? Are the odds of such a scenario high enough and the possible consequences bad enough to warrant the cost and effort of a war? Anyway, a decision had to be made. I believe the decision was made correctly as does the majority of the US population.

Pretty good attempt. :thumbsup

In addition...forward looking...proactive strategic positioning...an attempt to change the face of the middle east...an extention of our declared war on terrorism...which some in the administration have said will be a ten year war and others have said up to thirty years.

Leaving Iraq in chaos would be a disaster. We would probably have to do the whole damn thing over again in a year or so and that would likely cost a hell of a lot more than finishing the job we've started.

Maybe not but it is the ultimate service...putting your life on the line...instead of running your mouth.

England's low budget terrorism plan:

Let them buy up downtown investment properties and get friendly with the local bankers. Total cost zip.

For all you war whores , you can promote military sluts at

http://www.fetishmoney.com

:ak47:

hiya theking :Graucho

:thumbsup again...and the job will be finished...no matter the cost in money, or lives, or time...unless at some point the American people take to the streets...in mass...as happened during the Vietnam conflict.

Hi there to you Honey. :)

that'd be great
those people were fucktards
people complain now, but if anyother attack happens on US soil, they'll blame bush for not doing enough. now its too much, but then its not enough.

ps. michael moore :321GFY

http://www.gopfun.com/images/bush32a.gif

Hahaha even the prez does it.

:1orglaugh

hehehe

I can't even imagine Bush having sex...

How about Laura?

How lame is an administration which pursues a bystander while Osama sits there making videos waving a red flag? The biggest fucking example of displacement in world history. They uh, got the wrong guy. At least now finally Iraq is a hotbed of terrorist activity, as Bush had claimed it was in 2002. After injecting copious amounts of Afghan smack now again circulating the world thanks to U.S. sponsored drug kingpin warlord liberators, one might say he demonstrated leadership of a sort.

Hey Bubba! So glad to hear you were a mechanic! I'm sure that's where you learned your keen insight into the geo-political state of the world!

nahhhhhh:1orglaugh

damn you are ignorant. LM is Canadian, what is your excuse?

2 things are very apparent from your post:

The first: You started with we were attacked on 9/11. And we most definitely were. Why in the heck then didn't we go AFTER THE PEOPLE THAT ATTACKED US! It wasn't Saddam Hussein. It was Osama bin Laden and his henchmen! Somewhere along the line Bush goes "Yeah, Bin Laden attacked us..but I really hate that Saddam guy, and we KNOW where HE is, so let's blow the fuck out of his country!" And we did! But it did NOTHING..absoutely NOTHING at all to get us closer to getting the fuckers that attacked us on 9/11. It did NOTHING to make this country safer from attacks by Al-Qaeda.

The second thing that's evident in your post is that you like to play the "What if" game. What IF Saddam bought a nuke from North Korea and gave it to Al-Qaeda? That's just LAME! What's to stop North Korea then from just giving it DIRECTLY to Al-Qaeda? Why use Saddam as a middle man. Not to mention Hussein and Bin Laden HATE each other! One is secular, one is not!

Your whole case for attacking Iraq does NOT improve our security against terrorism and does not get us any closer to finding Osama Bin Laden. Yet all the pro-war people won't even talk about how we've all but given up the search for Bin Laden.

you said you were going to sleep last night so that your mind would be clear. . . . I see it did not help.

You were not alive then, so you do not know WTF you are talking about. Try limiting your discussions to things you have some knowledge of.

You are so enamored with the term "proactive strategic positioning" which means FUCK! It's so meaningless that the U.S. is BEGGING the United Nations to come in and help bail the United States out of a bad situation. You call THAT strategic positioning with we are begging for help? Downright laughable!

It's a tired old line: I was in the military, and you weren't, so I'm far more patriotic and serving of my country than you are.

Talk about running your mouth..that's all you EVER talk about.

Or Bush is defeated in '04! A more plausible scenario as each day goes by.

At least he has learned a few things and does have some insight...about which the same cannot be said for you.

The bottom line for me is that for all the things the Pro-war group has talked about, "Hussein was a bad man", "Strategic positioning", "Hussein could have used wmds", no where do you ever definitively point out how this war knocked out the terrorist network of Osama Bin Laden and the people that attacked the United States on 9/11/01!

So until you do, please do not use the line about how much safer the United States is today from terrorism because we attacked Iraq.

You will forever be doomed to have a small mind...with little comprehension...zero insight...and basically just plumb dumb.

No comprehension abilities. I bet the other kids made fun of that when you were in school...did you make it to the Sophomore level...before you dropped out in shame.

How many orders of fries did you serve today? You are dismissed yet once again...dumb ass.

Inability to dispute the argument, thus uses a dumb platitude.

How doest the war in Iraq have anything to do with 9/11? That was Bin Ladden and he is still alive and free... and might I point out.... NOT living in Iraq.

The Iraq war was for god knows what reason.. Your Wonderful presidet keeps changing the reason for this war.... One minute it's for the 9/11 (which they had nothing to do with), the next it's because of weapons of mass destruction, (none found), then it was because Saddam was a bad man and was killing his own people... Only GWB knows the reason for this war, I can only speculate.

As for him being a good president... well, he ran every busines he ever had control of into the ground, Texas has some of the poorest communities in the country.. and we elected this man president (i didn't vote for him)... how smart does that make us?

Please, how anyone can support this man is beyond me...

Inability to dispute the argument, thus attempts to riducule person about their past..but fails...AGAIN.

Inability to dispute the argument, so makes another bad attempt at ridicule. yawn

i think everyone just needs a hug

http://www.rockyspornpalace.com/catfriends.JPEG