ADL Colin |
09-03-2003 01:52 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
uh, who said that Clinton? As far as I know, "respond today" doesnt mean invade them today... And as far as I know, nearly all nations agreed that Saddam represented a possible threat... thats why inspectors returned.... As for the WMD statement... well maybe Clinton should have used the term "with possibly" ... Clinton is not perfect..
For the world war exemple... my point was that it can happen again... dont use history as proof that everything will be alright... THe world is continualy evolving...
|
Yeah, maybe he should have qualified that but of course he didn't because he believed Saddam had them - at least if one took him at his word - and I did. You are displaying exactly the kind of partisanship that I just wrote about. You're trying to give Clinton credit for believing something in opposition to his numerous statements to the contrary. There are at least dozens of times where Clinton alluded to Saddam's WMD's. That is of course exactly what I was pointing out. Both administrations thought Saddam had WMD's. Both administrations publicly said so.
If Clinton didn't believe Saddam has WMD's, George Bush was fighting a war only of liberation. I mean, come on. Let's be consistent in our criticism.
As far as "history". Again you are not reading what I am saying. I never said history is proof that a world war will never happen. In fact, it would surprise if there weren't some day. I never said anything even remotely like your interpretation.
What I said is"with the whole of history on my side I'll say it's hard to take any such comments seriously". Translation: "take any such comments seriously" refers to the comments directly above it in the post.
What that means is that history shows every administration is considered "the worst" by quite a whole lot of people. I didn't take the Republicans seriously who thought it of Clinton. I don't take the Democrats seriously who thought it of Bush. Why? Because both will be complaining just as vehemently about the next set of Democratic and Republican presidents. It has little to do with reality and everything to do with politics. Such politics have been typical since the founding of the Republic.
A side note. Many lessons can be drawn from history. One might be that any small event can turn into a large conflict. Another might be that dealing with ambitious totalitarian leasers is best done early. Usually people pick and choose in order to tell a story that correlates with their beliefs of what action should or should not be taken.
|