![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,761
|
![]() I'm listening to Berman respond to the question of double/triple/quadruple dips...
From what he said, it SOUNDS LIKE he said: Content providers selling PLUG-IN content (streamed, downloaded, whatever) that is served by them Ie... Pornoholio, HostedContent, Igallery etc sort of stuff... That those providers will not be required to be licensed, UNLESS they are offering samples of the video to webmasters on their pages. I guess the thing is maybe they CAN'T dip into the revenue stream more than once, so they have to pick & choose what they feel is the biggest revenue source (the paysites). If this is true, this just dropped my potential liability down to damn near $0. (Not that I was ever a video/audio content provider)... but if the license only applies to Paysites, and not Affilliates or TGP's promoting those paysites, or Cotnent providers serving content to those paysites.. then a lot of people just got 'off the hook'. Anyway please correct me if I am wrong there.... |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 1,630
|
I listened to the whole thing and I got that impression more then once during the questions.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,599
|
Quote:
I'm glad i didnt sign anything ;) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,761
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,680
|
I got that impression as well (hard to keep up with the slippery bastard and his evasions though). I do understand that, legally, they can't double-dip into a revenue stream on just one use of a patented technology.
So, this leads to the question: Can we expect content providers to next start bashing each other for not having a valid Acacia agreement on file?
__________________
<CENTER><A HREF="http://www.hot-off-bourbon.com/" target="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://www.hot-off-bourbon.com/images/hob-logosmall.jpg" border="0"></A> <FONT face="Comic Sans MS" SIZE="-1"><I>Mardi Gras, Spring Break, Wet-T, Night Club Action, UpSkirt, Oil Wrestling, Voyeur</I></FONT></CENTER> |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |