07-29-2003, 03:30 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,599
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goBigtime
I'm listening to Berman respond to the question of double/triple/quadruple dips...
From what he said, it SOUNDS LIKE he said:
Content providers selling PLUG-IN content (streamed, downloaded, whatever) that is served by them
Ie... Pornoholio, HostedContent, Igallery etc sort of stuff...
That those providers will not be required to be licensed, UNLESS they are offering samples of the video to webmasters on their pages.
I guess the thing is maybe they CAN'T dip into the revenue stream more than once, so they have to pick & choose what they feel is the biggest revenue source (the paysites).
If this is true, this just dropped my potential liability down to damn near $0.
(Not that I was ever a video/audio content provider)... but if the license only applies to Paysites, and not Affilliates or TGP's promoting those paysites, or Cotnent providers serving content to those paysites.. then a lot of people just got 'off the hook'.
Anyway please correct me if I am wrong there....
|
I'm glad i didnt sign anything ;) |
|
|