Bush gives new reason for war - iraq wouldn't allow weapons inspectors in - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

CraigA · 07-16-2003, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XYCash

If we let GW get away with lies then we might as well just elect Sadaam

Well it's about the severity of the lies because all politicians lie in some respect. I mean the last guy in the White House lied about about getting a BJ from a slutty intern and it got him impeached. This type of lying when young men's lives are at stake for some political agenda is far more serious.

XYCash · 07-16-2003, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CraigA

Well it's about the severity of the lies because all politicians lie in some respect. I mean the last guy in the White House lied about about getting a BJ from a slutty intern and it got him impeached. This type of lying when young men's lives are at stake for some political agenda is far more serious.

Young women too!

Gemini · 07-16-2003, 03:01 PM

The *really* sad thing is, when the vote comes, alot of you will enter that booth with certain things in mind... Whether you are one party or another...

1) The dems have no front leader (be you repub or dem)

2) Bush did something that could be construed right (take out Saddam)

3) If you are a Republican (just like alot of Democrats) you will want to vote party lines

4) When you reach for that lever or pokey thing, you will think, wellll we already KNOW what to expect so you hit Bush. (Just like many chuckleheads did for Regan,) If you are old enough, think about what Old Bonzo was trying to do, StarWars before the technology was even capable of it???? He heard computers can do ANYthing and went for it. He also started a sinking of the US.

Now we have Daddy Bush. READ My Lips...blah blah blah. He was right in the coalition running the idiots out of Kuwait, no matter if they had oil or not. But he didn't help alot with the economy and nailed taxes on top of taxes.

Now, and this part I fnd hysterical, PORN people (no matter the party) find a president is WRONG for lying about a BJ??? Yeah right, 98% of you would have or HAVE done the same already. It matters not what job you have, lying isn't exactly right eh? But He DID manage to do alot of good things.

So when you reaach for that lever, are you going to reward a dumb*ss for BEING a dumb*ss by giving him 4 more yrs... Because you already know what he might pull... or just vote for a Dem etc, because they couldn't be ANY worse than what we have. And given what has happened, they will be ALOT mor careful in what they say and do.

People that vote party lines aren't looking out for the country, they look out for only themselves. I guess By the People, FOR the people is gone. It should read, By the Rich FOR myself maybe.

XYCash · 07-16-2003, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gemini
The *really* sad thing is, when the vote comes, alot of you will enter that booth with certain things in mind... Whether you are one party or another...

1) The dems have no front leader (be you repub or dem)

.

Democrats have to front runner because the election really hasn't even started yet.

Keep in mind..just to put this in perspective. If this were 1991 - Bill Clinton would not have even entered the race for 3 more months.

-joe

CraigA · 07-18-2003, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XYCash

Democrats have to front runner because the election really hasn't even started yet.

Keep in mind..just to put this in perspective. If this were 1991 - Bill Clinton would not have even entered the race for 3 more months.

-joe

Exactly right. Someone will emerge from the other party during the primaries next spring. Keep an eye on North Carolina Senator John Edwards although he has already declared his intention to run. http://www.johnedwards2004.com/

07-16-2003, 03:01 PM	#53
Gemini Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: o-HI-o Posts: 7,183	The really sad thing is, when the vote comes, alot of you will enter that booth with certain things in mind... Whether you are one party or another... 1) The dems have no front leader (be you repub or dem) 2) Bush did something that could be construed right (take out Saddam) 3) If you are a Republican (just like alot of Democrats) you will want to vote party lines 4) When you reach for that lever or pokey thing, you will think, wellll we already KNOW what to expect so you hit Bush. (Just like many chuckleheads did for Regan,) If you are old enough, think about what Old Bonzo was trying to do, StarWars before the technology was even capable of it???? He heard computers can do ANYthing and went for it. He also started a sinking of the US. Now we have Daddy Bush. READ My Lips...blah blah blah. He was right in the coalition running the idiots out of Kuwait, no matter if they had oil or not. But he didn't help alot with the economy and nailed taxes on top of taxes. Now, and this part I fnd hysterical, PORN people (no matter the party) find a president is WRONG for lying about a BJ??? Yeah right, 98% of you would have or HAVE done the same already. It matters not what job you have, lying isn't exactly right eh? But He DID manage to do alot of good things. So when you reaach for that lever, are you going to reward a dumbss for BEING a dumbss by giving him 4 more yrs... Because you already know what he might pull... or just vote for a Dem etc, because they couldn't be ANY worse than what we have. And given what has happened, they will be ALOT mor careful in what they say and do. People that vote party lines aren't looking out for the country, they look out for only themselves. I guess By the People, FOR the people is gone. It should read, By the Rich FOR myself maybe. __________________ <center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center>