Slap on the wrist for child pornography. - GoFuckYourself.com

chodadog · 07-05-2003, 07:04 AM

http://www.nypost.com/seven/06242003...lnews/1676.htm

<i>The disgraced New York Law School professor caught with 150,000 child-porn pix - including nauseating images involving babies and dogs - got a wrist-slap sentence yesterday: He'll stay free until the end of October, then serve six months in jail. </i>

Six months. Six fucking months. What a fucking joke.

gothweb · 07-05-2003, 07:06 AM

Keep in mind he was just looking at the pictures. Production and distribution should be the more serious crimes. Still, that is a pretty weak sentence.

chodadog · 07-05-2003, 07:29 AM

Shit, people have gotten greater sentances than that for carrying pot for christ's sake. The fucker should be put away for a long time. I hope he is buggerised several times a day during his 6 month stay.

Dirty F · 07-05-2003, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb
Keep in mind he was just looking at the pictures. Production and distribution should be the more serious crimes. Still, that is a pretty weak sentence.

Sometimes i dont understand you.

You already scream kiddie porn when someone posts a fully clothed girl on this board that *looks* like she might be 17 and you take this so lightly...

I can imagine why they put guys like you on an island

LadyMischief · 07-05-2003, 08:22 AM

That's fucking sick. And he's in a position of authority too.. This fucker should roast in jail for YEARS, catered to by Bubba himself. Fucking digusting puke.

Paul Markham · 07-05-2003, 08:33 AM

I turned in one of these kind of guys many years ago.

The child protection unit at Scotland Yard handled the case. The chief Inspector told me that when they find an owner kiddie porn they find someone who fantasises about doing it and probably has.

Six months is a joke and no deterent. In fact the collectors of this filth will tell themselves "See it's not so bad to collect it"

LadyMischief · 07-05-2003, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
I turned in one of these kind of guys many years ago.

The child protection unit at Scotland Yard handled the case. The chief Inspector told me that when they find an owner kiddie porn they find someone who fantasises about doing it and probably has.

Six months is a joke and no deterent. In fact the collectors of this filth will tell themselves "See it's not so bad to collect it"

Yep.. 6 months is a cakewalk.. What they need to start doing is castrating these fucks, frying up their balls and feeding them to them. That would "deter" a few people, I think.

unconnected · 07-05-2003, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Shit, people have gotten greater sentances than that for carrying pot for christ's sake.

Not like we needed more proof, but just another thing showcasing how incredibly fucked up and backwards the american gov't is as well as the justice system.. Because it is absolutely true.. You get caught with an 1/8th of weed on you and you are in serious shit.. A lot more shit then getting caught jerking to pictures of a 14 month old baby getting fucked by a dog. Maybe this makes it a little more clear why the rest of the world is scared out of their minds that americans are running the free-world, its because we know how you run your own country and that freaks us out.

rowan · 07-05-2003, 02:16 PM

New York Law School allowed him to remain on paid leave for nearly a year after the techies discovered the porn - and were quickly fired.

This is also fucked up, the guys who do the right thing and report him get fired, and the sicko gets to go on paid leave for a year.

JDog · 07-05-2003, 02:18 PM

That is fucking weak. It doesn't matter if you produce it or just view it. It is wrong! Six months is nothing. Let's hang the fucker.

jDoG

Mr.Fiction · 07-05-2003, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JDog
That is fucking weak. It doesn't matter if you produce it or just view it.

Even if we were to agree this sentence is light, anyone idiot can see there is a huge difference between producing and viewing.

In one case you are hurting kids, in another, you are looking at pictures of someone hurting kids.

Both are wrong, but they are magnitudes apart on the crime scale.

bawdy · 07-05-2003, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction

Even if we were to agree this sentence is light, anyone idiot can see there is a huge difference between producing and viewing.

In one case you are hurting kids, in another, you are looking at pictures of someone hurting kids.

Both are wrong, but they are magnitudes apart on the crime scale.

well i see it a bit differently.... if someone subscribed to a paysite that in turned commissioned the production of new materials then they are just as guilty as the producer of the original materials

gothweb · 07-05-2003, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss

Sometimes i dont understand you.

You already scream kiddie porn when someone posts a fully clothed girl on this board that *looks* like she might be 17 and you take this so lightly...

I can imagine why they put guys like you on an island

Sometimes I will comment when someone on here will show a girl who I think *looks* under-18. In those cases, I am generally not talking about the legality or morality of using pictures of her. My comments that I would "stay away" are usually a matter of thinking that no webmaster will want the hassle of getting *accused* of child porn, something that has very little to do with the actual age of the models.

gothweb · 07-05-2003, 03:00 PM

Also, who says I was taking this lightly? Everyone knows child porn is horrible. The post and article were from on perspective... To just post and say "I agree totally" would be silly. I tried to add something to the discussion. Doesn't mean I like the guy, or think he didn't deserve a tougher sentence.

He-Man · 07-05-2003, 03:08 PM

"Kitchen Books"

"The professor's colleagues and friends, filling two rows in the courtroom"

You should support your friends through everything is it not so!!!

He-Man

07-05-2003, 07:04 AM	#1
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	Slap on the wrist for child pornography. http://www.nypost.com/seven/06242003...lnews/1676.htm <i>The disgraced New York Law School professor caught with 150,000 child-porn pix - including nauseating images involving babies and dogs - got a wrist-slap sentence yesterday: He'll stay free until the end of October, then serve six months in jail. </i> Six months. Six fucking months. What a fucking joke. __________________ 26 + 6 = 1

07-05-2003, 07:06 AM	#2
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	Keep in mind he was just looking at the pictures. Production and distribution should be the more serious crimes. Still, that is a pretty weak sentence. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

07-05-2003, 07:29 AM	#3
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	Shit, people have gotten greater sentances than that for carrying pot for christ's sake. The fucker should be put away for a long time. I hope he is buggerised several times a day during his 6 month stay. __________________ 26 + 6 = 1

07-05-2003, 08:22 AM	#5
LadyMischief Orgasms N Such! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Ontario Posts: 18,135	That's fucking sick. And he's in a position of authority too.. This fucker should roast in jail for YEARS, catered to by Bubba himself. Fucking digusting puke. __________________ ICQ 3522039 Content Manager - orgasm.com [email protected]

07-05-2003, 08:33 AM	#6
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	I turned in one of these kind of guys many years ago. The child protection unit at Scotland Yard handled the case. The chief Inspector told me that when they find an owner kiddie porn they find someone who fantasises about doing it and probably has. Six months is a joke and no deterent. In fact the collectors of this filth will tell themselves "See it's not so bad to collect it" __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

07-05-2003, 02:16 PM	#9
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	New York Law School allowed him to remain on paid leave for nearly a year after the techies discovered the porn - and were quickly fired. This is also fucked up, the guys who do the right thing and report him get fired, and the sicko gets to go on paid leave for a year.

07-05-2003, 02:18 PM	#10
JDog Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Canby, OR Posts: 7,453	That is fucking weak. It doesn't matter if you produce it or just view it. It is wrong! Six months is nothing. Let's hang the fucker. jDoG __________________ NSCash now powering ReelProfits.com ALSO FEATURING: NSCash.com :: SoloDollars.com :: ReelProfits.com :: BiminiBucks.com :: VOD PROGRAMS COMING SOON: Greedy Bucks :: Vengeance Cash NOW OFFERING OVER 60 SITES CONTACT :: JAMES SMITH :: CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER :: ICQ (711385133)

07-05-2003, 03:00 PM	#14
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	Also, who says I was taking this lightly? Everyone knows child porn is horrible. The post and article were from on perspective... To just post and say "I agree totally" would be silly. I tried to add something to the discussion. Doesn't mean I like the guy, or think he didn't deserve a tougher sentence. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

07-05-2003, 03:08 PM	#15
He-Man Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Amsterdam!! Posts: 706	"Kitchen Books" "The professor's colleagues and friends, filling two rows in the courtroom" You should support your friends through everything is it not so!!! He-Man __________________ "We don't make mistakes, we have happy little accidents." Bob "King of the Canvas" Ross