Is vegas video faster than premier - GoFuckYourself.com

tony286 · 06-14-2003, 08:32 AM

With all things being equal hardware wise. Which one is faster to work with, we are starting to more video production and it seems on premier to takes forever.

Ketadream · 06-14-2003, 09:42 AM

Vegas encoding is slow...

Also its refresh is a bit slow as well.

All things considered premere will be faster encoding but is harder to use. Vegas is a good middle of the road solution.

foe · 06-14-2003, 09:47 AM

va2k seams to like it

TheFLY · 06-14-2003, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ketadream
All things considered premere will be faster encoding but is harder to use.

No shit -- i just tried to add some text to a vid -- after an hour of reading docs and looking through the menus -- I gave up and deleted it... You would think by now a zillion versions into development they would have made the interface intuitive by now

Backov · 06-14-2003, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheFLY

No shit -- i just tried to add some text to a vid -- after an hour of reading docs and looking through the menus -- I gave up and deleted it... You would think by now a zillion versions into development they would have made the interface intuitive by now

It's quite simple once you know the trick. After that, it's so extremely easy you'll love it.

Centurion · 06-14-2003, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ketadream
Vegas encoding is slow...

Also its refresh is a bit slow as well.

All things considered premere will be faster encoding but is harder to use. Vegas is a good middle of the road solution.

Hmm..gotta disagree with ya on this one. I've tried premiere, cleaner, tmpmpeg (sp?), lsx, etc..and one of the reasons I did decide to go with Vegas was because it encoded faster than any of them. The only program I found faster was for real media format..and Real.com's Real Producer Plus was a tad faster there. But that's the only one I've found to be so.

RedShoe · 06-14-2003, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion

Hmm..gotta disagree with ya on this one. I've tried premiere, cleaner, tmpmpeg (sp?), lsx, etc..and one of the reasons I did decide to go with Vegas was because it encoded faster than any of them. The only program I found faster was for real media format..and Real.com's Real Producer Plus was a tad faster there. But that's the only one I've found to be so.

ditto. If you have a good enough machine you can ebcode 30 minute movies from Raw AVI to Edited AVI rather quickly.

I run a P4 3.06 GHZ with a gig of ram and 80 gigs of storage just for encoding and this fucker flies.

06-14-2003, 08:32 AM	#1
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	Is vegas video faster than premier With all things being equal hardware wise. Which one is faster to work with, we are starting to more video production and it seems on premier to takes forever.

06-14-2003, 09:42 AM	#2
Ketadream Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Austin Posts: 1,373	Vegas encoding is slow... Also its refresh is a bit slow as well. All things considered premere will be faster encoding but is harder to use. Vegas is a good middle of the road solution. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

06-14-2003, 09:47 AM	#3
foe Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: CT Posts: 5,246	va2k seams to like it